创业者与巨头博弈
Search documents
曾德钧再回应分享与雷军经历:控诉水军、反思“惹不起”,创业者与巨头的博弈何解?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-30 10:01
Core Viewpoint - The recent controversy between the founder of Cat King Audio, Zeng Dejun, and Xiaomi's founder, Lei Jun, highlights the tension between entrepreneurs and industry giants, reflecting the challenges faced by startups in gaining recognition and support from established companies [6]. Group 1: Background of the Controversy - Zeng Dejun recounted a past meeting with Lei Jun's Shunwei Capital over ten years ago, where he faced skepticism regarding the potential of smart speakers, which were then considered an unclear concept [2]. - Zeng expressed feelings of being belittled when Lei Jun questioned the utility of smart speakers and left the meeting abruptly [2]. Group 2: Responses and Clarifications - Following the initial comments, Zeng released a clarification video stating that he did not intend to target Xiaomi or Lei Jun personally, and that his remarks had been misinterpreted by some media outlets [3]. - Xiaomi's public relations head, Wang Hua, responded by stating that Shunwei Capital had never received negative feedback regarding their investment practices [5]. Group 3: Implications for Entrepreneurs and Giants - The incident underscores the power imbalance between entrepreneurs and large corporations, emphasizing the need for a more respectful and communicative investment environment [6][7]. - Zeng's emotional response reflects the frustration entrepreneurs may feel when faced with dismissive feedback from industry leaders, which can lead to public disputes [6]. - The controversy has drawn attention to Cat King Audio, but it may also negatively impact the company's image and user trust in the long run [6]. Group 4: Lessons for Future Interactions - The event serves as a reminder for Xiaomi to enhance communication with entrepreneurs and to show adequate respect to avoid misunderstandings and potential public relations crises [6]. - Lei Jun, as a public figure, should balance commercial judgment with the impact of his public statements [6].