Group 1 - The article highlights the detrimental impact of "three-slap cadres," who make impulsive decisions, overpromise, and leave without accountability, leading to long-term issues for successors [1] - Local officials express frustration over previous administrations that pursued projects for short-term gains, resulting in ineffective "landmark projects" that burden future governance [1] - The behavior of "three-slap cadres" undermines public trust in government and erodes the credibility of the party, as they prioritize personal visibility over long-term community welfare [1] Group 2 - To address the issues caused by "three-slap cadres," it is essential to strengthen institutional safeguards, promote cautious decision-making, and implement a lifelong accountability system for negligence [1] - Genuine achievements should focus on substantive outcomes rather than superficial appearances, necessitating a shift towards grassroots engagement, precise policy implementation, and responsible problem-solving [1] - Creating a clean political environment that respects diligent work will diminish the influence of "three-slap cadres" and foster a culture that values practical contributions [1]