有个人们熟知的"邹忌照镜"的故事。面对"吾与徐公孰美"的提问，邹忌身边的人都回答说邹忌更美。邹 忌却不盲信，从身边人的举动，辨明其"私我""畏我""欲有求于我"的不同动机。个中道理，今天读来仍 启人思考。 一些人的"口蜜""面誉"，貌似"重我"，实为"重权"。听惯了吹捧、享惯了奉承，难保不会迷乱了初心、 丢掉了党性。由此而言，越是被恭维，越是要"轻我"，以超脱心态看待功名利禄，以严正姿态挡住诱惑 腐蚀。 刚出校门的"毛头小子"，偏远山乡的"芝麻干部"，有时会被别人瞧不起。避免掉入妄自菲薄、怨天尤人 的陷阱，"重我"是破局良策。 守岛32年的王继才、"校长妈妈"张桂梅、义无反顾回馈大山的黄文秀……他们无不"重我"，重视的是党 员第一身份。党和人民需要什么，党员就要追求什么、奉献什么。把党和人民交付的工作当作一项事业 去打拼，尽心竭力担当任事、为民服务，才是人民心中真正的"成功轨迹"。 知人者智，自知者明。对于党员干部来说，既要善于倾听，也要学会辨析，在他人"看重"与"看轻"中觉 察自我，"自我画像"才会分外鲜明，干事创业才不会陷入迷茫。 "重我"与"轻我"并不割裂。看重党的托付、人民的期盼，才能更加注重党性修养 ...

有个人们熟知的"邹忌照镜"的故事。面对"吾与徐公孰美"的提问，邹忌身边的人都回答说邹忌更美。邹 忌却不盲信，从身边人的举动，辨明其"私我""畏我""欲有求于我"的不同动机。个中道理，今天读来仍 启人思考。 知人者智，自知者明。对于党员干部来说，既要善于倾听，也要学会辨析，在他人"看重"与"看轻"中觉 察自我，"自我画像"才会分外鲜明，干事创业才不会陷入迷茫。 刚出校门的"毛头小子"，偏远山乡的"芝麻干部"，有时会被别人瞧不起。避免掉入妄自菲薄、怨天尤人 的陷阱，"重我"是破局良策。 守岛32年的王继才、"校长妈妈"张桂梅、义无反顾回馈大山的黄文秀……他们无不"重我"，重视的是党 员第一身份。党和人民需要什么，党员就要追求什么、奉献什么。把党和人民交付的工作当作一项事业 去打拼，尽心竭力担当任事、为民服务，才是人民心中真正的"成功轨迹"。 "重我"与"轻我"并不割裂。看重党的托付、人民的期盼，才能更加注重党性修养、克服私心杂念；把个 人名利置之度外，才能心无旁骛地履职尽责、爱民裕民。自我实现，不在职位高低，不在名誉多寡，而 在挺身于党和人民最需要的地方，把一方水土与一众百姓装进心里。 "看重"与"看轻"，关键在 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the legacy of the hero Bu Fenggang, emphasizing his "Five No's" motto that reflects integrity, discipline, and dedication to the people, serving as a guiding principle for current and future leaders [1][10][15]. Group 1: Bu Fenggang's Legacy - Bu Fenggang, known as the "Lone Hero," captured 124 enemies at the age of 18 during the Battle of Tower Mountain and was awarded the "Mao Zedong Medal" for his bravery [3][11]. - His "Five No's" motto includes principles such as not yielding to personal interests, maintaining integrity in the face of power, and prioritizing the welfare of the people [4][6][14]. - Bu Fenggang's life choices and actions serve as a model for current military personnel, emphasizing the importance of selflessness and dedication to the party and the people [12][15]. Group 2: Influence on Current Practices - The military unit where Bu Fenggang worked continues to uphold his principles, with current leaders establishing similar rules to maintain integrity and accountability [6][10]. - New recruits are educated on the importance of Bu Fenggang's legacy, reinforcing the idea that leadership should focus on serving the people rather than personal gain [4][10]. - The story of Bu Fenggang inspires current military personnel to emulate his selfless actions, fostering a culture of dedication and service within the ranks [14][15].

党员干部的政绩如何，终究要看实实在在的发展成色、真真切切的群众评价。"标签"再光鲜，挡不住群 众雪亮的眼睛；落实不到位，遮不住发展停滞的隐忧。一切工作的最终评判，不在台账有多厚、标签有 多亮，而在于解决了多少真问题、带来了多少真实惠、赢得了多少真民心。与其耗费心思贴上博眼球的 标签，不如俯身倾听最质朴的群众反映；与其沉迷于自我设计的"标签化思维"，不如锤炼直面矛盾、攻 坚克难的能力本领；与其关起门来"贴标签"，不如推开门去"钉钉子"。群众心中的那杆秤，称量的是实 打实的获得感、幸福感、安全感，而非虚头巴脑的"标签秀"。 实绩实效，从来不是"标签"的罗列，而是脚印的叠加、难题的攻克、民心的凝聚。祛"标签"之浮，须以 铁脚板踏破形式主义藩篱，务实功、出实绩。从思想上纠偏，树牢实绩标尺。强化正确的政绩观，用典 型案例正反剖析，让"金杯银杯不如百姓口碑"入脑入心。优化制度机制，破除"贴标签"积弊，使考核 重"现场"轻"会场"，重"实绩"轻"痕迹"，重"口碑"轻"材料"，让实绩真正从"沃土"里长出来，而非在"材 料"中堆出来。对热衷"贴标签"者坚决"亮黄牌""打板子"。发扬严实作风，锤炼"铁脚硬功"。党员干部干 工作决 ...

(责编：杨光宇、胡永秋) 党员干部的政绩如何，终究要看实实在在的发展成色、真真切切的群众评价。"标签"再光鲜，挡不住群 众雪亮的眼睛；落实不到位，遮不住发展停滞的隐忧。一切工作的最终评判，不在台账有多厚、标签有 多亮，而在于解决了多少真问题、带来了多少真实惠、赢得了多少真民心。与其耗费心思贴上博眼球的 标签，不如俯身倾听最质朴的群众反映；与其沉迷于自我设计的"标签化思维"，不如锤炼直面矛盾、攻 坚克难的能力本领；与其关起门来"贴标签"，不如推开门去"钉钉子"。群众心中的那杆秤，称量的是实 打实的获得感、幸福感、安全感，而非虚头巴脑的"标签秀"。 实绩实效，从来不是"标签"的罗列，而是脚印的叠加、难题的攻克、民心的凝聚。祛"标签"之浮，须以 铁脚板踏破形式主义藩篱，务实功、出实绩。从思想上纠偏，树牢实绩标尺。强化正确的政绩观，用典 型案例正反剖析，让"金杯银杯不如百姓口碑"入脑入心。优化制度机制，破除"贴标签"积弊，使考核 重"现场"轻"会场"，重"实绩"轻"痕迹"，重"口碑"轻"材料"，让实绩真正从"沃土"里长出来，而非在"材 料"中堆出来。对热衷"贴标签"者坚决"亮黄牌""打板子"。发扬严实作风，锤炼"铁脚 ...

结合具体案例，徐曙海剖析了镇江干部在作风方面存在的具体问题。他强调，全市党员干部要以彻 底的自我革命精神强作风。要做政治上的明白人，坚定政治信仰，把准政治方向，站稳政治立场，扛起 政治责任，把"两个是否"作为改革成效的评价标准；要做负责任的实干家，干事认真起来、深入细致、 提高标准，踏踏实实、扎扎实实干出成绩；要做有胆识的冲锋队，敢于动真碰硬啃"硬骨头"，敢于向歪 风邪气亮剑，坚决不当"老好人"，努力在奋勇争先中创造新业绩；要做抓落实的行动派，行动要迅速、 措施要有力、过程要闭环；要做精业务的内行人，敏于求知、勤于钻研、善于自省，干一行爱一行钻一 行；要做守底线的老实人，自觉按规律办事、按规矩做事，在决定镇江未来发展的关键时期，以坚定有 力的作为为镇江高质量发展作出贡献。 市委常委、市委组织部部长、市委党校（市行政学院）校长（院长）张娟主持开学典礼并作动员讲 话。 市政府秘书长戴卫东，第71期县处级干部进修班学员、第26期中青年干部培训班学员、2025年市级 机关和参照管理单位新任职处长培训班学员等在现场聆听。（记者 陈志奎） 9月15日，市委党校（市行政学院）举行2025年秋季学期开学典礼。市长徐曙海出席并 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of formalism in the use of PowerPoint presentations (PPT) within certain departments, indicating that the focus on creating visually appealing presentations detracts from actual work and service to the public [1]. Group 1: Issues Identified - Some grassroots officials express frustration that significant time is spent on designing attractive PPTs instead of serving the community and implementing concrete actions [1]. - The tendency to prioritize presentation aesthetics over substance has increased the burden on grassroots workers, leading to wastefulness and a departure from a pragmatic work style [1]. Group 2: Government Response - The Central Committee of the Communist Party and the State Council have issued regulations aimed at reducing formalism and bureaucratic practices, emphasizing the need for substantial achievements over superficial packaging [1]. - The focus of these regulations is to establish a correct view of performance, promoting genuine efforts and practical results rather than mere presentation [1].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issue of "formalism" in the use of PowerPoint presentations (PPT) within government sectors, emphasizing the need for a shift towards practical and efficient work practices rather than superficial presentations [1][2]. Group 1: Issues with PPT Usage - PPT has transformed from a tool for efficiency to a new variant of formalism in some departments, leading to unnecessary burdens on grassroots workers [1]. - Some localities have initiated special actions to reduce the quantity, cost, and burden of PPTs in public activities, receiving positive feedback from grassroots officials and the public [1]. - Despite these initiatives, certain units still evaluate performance based on the quality of PPT presentations, which can lead to increased workloads and a focus on superficial aspects rather than substantive work [1]. Group 2: Distorted Performance Views - There is a distorted view of performance among some grassroots officials, who prioritize creating impressive PPTs over serving the public and implementing concrete actions [2]. - This tendency results in wasted time, energy, and resources on unnecessary embellishments, moving away from a pragmatic work style [2]. - The article calls for a correction of performance evaluation methods, shifting from a focus on presentation aesthetics to actual accountability and results [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To address the issue of formalism in PPTs, it is essential to establish a correct view of performance, emphasizing substance over superficiality [2]. - The article advocates for reducing bureaucratic formalities that do not contribute to work effectiveness or public interest, allowing officials to focus more on addressing urgent public needs [2]. - Digitalization should serve as a tool for practical efficiency rather than a means of perpetuating formalism, promoting a culture of genuine effort and tangible results [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the dialectical relationship between "acting promptly" and "persevering for the long term," which provides fundamental guidance for advancing initiatives and development [1][3][4] - "Acting promptly" highlights the importance of speed and efficiency, reflecting a proactive historical spirit necessary to seize opportunities in a rapidly changing world [1][3] - The urgency to act quickly is underscored by the need to respond to unprecedented challenges and opportunities in the current global landscape [1][2] Group 2 - "Persevering for the long term" stresses the value of endurance and strategic patience, warning against the pitfalls of seeking immediate results without considering long-term impacts [2][3] - Historical examples, such as the ecological achievements of the Saihanba people and the development of the Beidou satellite navigation system, illustrate the necessity of sustained effort over time [2][3] - The relationship between "acting promptly" and "persevering for the long term" is crucial for achieving high-quality development, requiring a balance between immediate action and long-term strategy [3][4] Group 3 - Establishing a correct view of performance is key to understanding the relationship between "acting promptly" and "persevering for the long term," as both are essential for high-quality development [4][5] - Current challenges include short-sighted behaviors among some officials, which can lead to ineffective projects and misaligned performance goals [4] - The need for a strategic layout that balances immediate actions with long-term goals is emphasized, particularly in the context of international competition and technological innovation [4][5]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining a clear mind among party leaders to avoid being misled by flattery and to ensure they listen to the genuine voices of the people [1][2][3]. Group 1 - Party leaders must avoid the "killing by flattery" phenomenon, which can lead to a distorted view of power and performance, prioritizing superficial achievements over substantial ones [2][3]. - There is a need for party leaders to recognize the difference between sincere advice and insincere praise, fostering an environment where honest feedback is welcomed [3][4]. - The article highlights the detrimental effects of flattery on political ecology, urging leaders to strengthen their party spirit and maintain a humble approach towards the public [4][5]. Group 2 - The article calls for a commitment to the principles established by the Central Eight Regulations, emphasizing the need for a long-term adherence to strict measures and a clean political atmosphere [1][4]. - It stresses the importance of cultivating a political environment that discourages sycophancy and encourages genuine communication between leaders and the public [5].