三拍干部
Search documents
“三拍干部”要不得
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-02-07 23:55
真正的政绩不在"面子"而在"里子"。唯有摒弃虚浮作风,多深入基层察实情,多精准施策办实事,多扛 责担当解难题,才能让"三拍干部"失去市场,让实干者得到尊崇,才能营造风清气正的政治生态,为发 展注入持久动力。 责编:曹思洋 唐成选 下基层采访,会有当地干部吐槽前任留下的"烂摊子":为追求政绩盲目上项目,大把的银子花了,建成 的"标志性工程"却没啥用处,留也不是扒也不是,像城市的伤疤一样明晃晃地摆在那里。为吸引投资开 空头支票,承诺兑现不了,"曲难终,人不见",不诚信的恶劣形象只能由后任买单,多少年难以消 除…… "三拍"之下,坏了党风政风,透支了党和政府的公信力,最终侵蚀的是群众对干部队伍的信任。 "三拍"干部从表面上看是"敢闯敢干",实则是政绩观错位、责任心缺失,只想当政绩上的"显眼包",全 然不顾地方长远发展和群众福祉,将权力视为可任性挥舞的"魔法棒",而非沉甸甸的"担子"。 根治"三拍"顽疾,需要筑牢制度防线,倒逼干部心存敬畏、审慎用权。需要健全科学决策机制,让决策 告别"一言堂"。更要强化终身追责制度,让失职者无处遁形。 "拍脑袋决策、拍胸脯承诺、拍屁股走人",这样的"三拍干部"在现实中虽属少数,但危害 ...
警惕“三拍”干部背后的政绩冲动(金台潮声)
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-08-11 22:01
Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the detrimental impact of "formality" and "bureaucracy" in governance, leading to ineffective projects and loss of public trust [1] - A specific case is mentioned where a former county secretary initiated a tourism project costing over 20 million, which failed to operate effectively, reflecting poor decision-making [1] - The report emphasizes the need for a correct performance view among party members to avoid superficial projects that waste resources and harm the government's image [1] Group 2 - The importance of prioritizing practical solutions over superficial appearances is underscored, as seen in the example of a local government maintaining a modest entrance while focusing on service delivery [2] - Successful development in tourism is linked to thorough research and tailored strategies, contrasting with impulsive and unplanned initiatives [2] - The report advocates for a grounded approach to governance, emphasizing the need for real achievements that address community needs [2] Group 3 - The concept of "nail-driving spirit" is introduced, stressing the importance of long-term, foundational work over short-term gains in governance [3] - The report calls for a shift away from performance-driven impulses towards a focus on substantial, measurable outcomes that benefit the community [3] - It highlights that the true measure of a party member's performance lies in tangible development results and public satisfaction [3]