Core Points - Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan emphasized the need for a clear legal and political framework for the "Palestinian Committee" and "Peace Council" responsible for Gaza management, as well as the scope of the "stabilization forces" [1] - Fidan stated that Gaza should be treated as part of Palestine and confirmed Turkey's participation in the upcoming "Gaza Conference" hosted by Egypt, along with ongoing support for temporary resettlement and reconstruction efforts [1] - Fidan noted that Hamas has shown willingness to facilitate a permanent ceasefire, and Israel should reciprocate with corresponding actions [1] - Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shoukry indicated that Egypt and Turkey agree to coordinate actions for implementing the Gaza ceasefire and advancing the "second phase" [1] Summary by Categories Political Developments - The push for a UN Security Council resolution regarding administrative and security arrangements in Gaza is underway, with emphasis on defining the roles of the "Palestinian Committee" and "Peace Council" [1] - The need for clarity on the tasks of "stabilization forces" was highlighted [1] Humanitarian Efforts - A ship carrying approximately 810 tons of humanitarian supplies has departed from Mersin Port to El Arish, indicating ongoing humanitarian support efforts [1] - Turkey's commitment to support temporary resettlement and reconstruction in Gaza was reiterated [1] Ceasefire Negotiations - Both Turkey and Egypt are working towards executing a ceasefire in Gaza, with a focus on advancing to the next phase of coordination [1] - The willingness of Hamas to promote a permanent ceasefire was acknowledged, with a call for Israel to take corresponding measures [1]

Core Viewpoint - The ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas is seen as a starting point for new political, military, and humanitarian negotiations rather than an end to the conflict [1][2]. Governance Challenges - The governance of Gaza post-ceasefire is a significant challenge, as the Palestinian Authority has not managed Gaza since 2007, leading to a lack of governance experience and basic service provision [2][3]. - An effective governance structure is necessary to restore market operations and manage essential services, which may require utilizing personnel with experience from Hamas and local civil society organizations [3]. Disarmament and Military Threats - Hamas's refusal to fully disarm poses a risk of escalating tensions, particularly with local tribes reportedly controlling 80% of Gaza, which could lead to internal conflict if Hamas disarms [4][5]. - There is potential for a compromise regarding disarmament, but Hamas remains cautious about relying on Israeli security forces due to past failures in ceasefire negotiations [4]. Ceasefire Durability and International Involvement - The immediate future of the ceasefire appears stable due to strong U.S. intervention, but there are concerns about the implementation of subsequent actions, such as deploying international stabilization forces in Gaza [5][6]. - Establishing an international governance body is crucial for Gaza's reconstruction and economic recovery, alongside ensuring the free movement of residents and resources [6]. Regional Geopolitical Changes - The geopolitical landscape in the Middle East has shifted significantly, with a decline in Hezbollah's military power and Iran's influence, while Gulf states like Saudi Arabia, UAE, and Qatar have emerged as key players [7][8]. - The U.S. is strengthening ties with Gulf nations, focusing on commercial interests and military cooperation, which may influence future regional dynamics [7][8].