Core Viewpoint - The short drama industry is facing challenges regarding contract norms and the protection of creators' rights, highlighting the need for clearer regulations to safeguard the interests of all parties involved [1]. Group 1: Industry Practices - Many actors in the short drama sector, particularly supporting roles, often work based on verbal agreements rather than formal contracts, leading to disputes over payment [1]. - A recent case in the Tongzhou District People's Court confirmed that agreements made via electronic communication, such as WeChat, can be considered valid as long as the terms are clear [2]. - The court ruled that production companies cannot withhold payment based on uncommunicated obligations, emphasizing the importance of clear agreements regarding additional work like dubbing [2]. Group 2: Legal Framework - The distinction between labor and service contracts is crucial, with labor relationships requiring stricter conditions such as ongoing management and oversight by the production company [3]. - In cases of service contracts, actors can claim payment and damages through civil litigation, while labor contracts fall under labor law, allowing for arbitration and complaints to labor authorities [3]. - Electronic evidence, including chat records and payment receipts, is vital in proving agreements when formal contracts are lacking, underscoring the importance of maintaining comprehensive documentation [3]. Group 3: Actor Rights - Actors have legal rights to rest periods, even if not explicitly stated in contracts, and can refuse excessive working hours that may harm their health [4]. - Clauses that exempt companies from responsibility or waive actors' rights are often deemed invalid, protecting actors from unfair contractual terms [4]. - Courts may adjust high penalty clauses in contracts based on the actor's compensation and actual losses to ensure judicial fairness [4].