Workflow
劳动纠纷调解
icon
Search documents
工会调解助企业厘清用工自主权边界
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-21 18:31
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the importance of adhering to legal regulations when companies make changes to employee positions or statuses, emphasizing that such actions must be reasonable and lawful to protect workers' rights [1][2]. Group 1: Labor Disputes and Resolutions - In Yingkou City, two labor disputes arose from job reassignment and standby status, showcasing the need for lawful practices in employment changes [1]. - A case involving an employee, Wang Qiang, illustrates that unilateral job reassignment without proper legal basis can lead to disputes, which were resolved through union mediation, restoring his original position and salary [1]. - Another case with Li Li involved a restaurant management company attempting to terminate a contract due to a claimed job change, which was also resolved through mediation, resulting in an economic compensation agreement [1]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Responsibilities - The Labor Contract Law in China stipulates that changes to employment contracts, including job positions and locations, must be based on mutual agreement and follow principles of equality and voluntary negotiation [1]. - Companies are urged to enhance their legal awareness and comply with regulations when exercising employment autonomy to avoid infringing on workers' rights [2]. - The role of unions and mediation organizations is emphasized as crucial in providing legal advice and dispute resolution services, while labor inspection departments are called to strengthen oversight of employment practices [2].
47岁女子上班期间冲泡奶茶被辞退,实为公司经营压力下的裁员托词!法院判了
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-13 10:29
本文转自【潮新闻】; 前不久,某公司的员工万某遇到了一件"寒心事":因"上班期间冲泡奶茶",公司要与其解除劳动关系。 47岁的万某已在公司工作四年,却一直未签订书面劳动合同。2025年3月,公司以上班"喝奶茶"为由要 辞退她,这让老员工万某感到既寒心又愤怒,决心要与公司"死磕到底"。 最终,一场可能需要仲裁乃至诉讼的纠纷,在握手言和中悄然落幕:公司当场支付万某经济补偿金,万 某也撤回仲裁申请,双方确认解除劳动关系。 (文中当事人为化名) "经调查发现,该公司实为仅有5名员工的便利店,以'喝奶茶'为由辞退员工,实为经营压力下的裁员托 词。"1月12日,劳动争议调解人民委员会专职调解员告诉记者。 面对这类在小微企业中常见的用工不规范现象,调解没有简单"一刀切",而是采取"背对背"沟通:一方 面向企业普法,强调"裁员也须依法";另一方面向万某解释,工作满一年后视为订立无固定期限合同, 某些诉求难以完全支持。 情理与法理交融中,双方逐步靠近。公司坦言裁员"实属无奈",愿意补偿;万某也放下高预期,接受调 解。 万某愤而提出17271元的赔偿诉求,包括未签合同的双倍工资、违法解雇赔偿金、加班工资等多项费 用,并向当地劳动 ...