Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the limitations of AI, particularly in the context of language models (LLMs) and video models, using the metaphor of "Plato's Cave" to illustrate the difference between human cognition and AI's understanding of the world [6][30][32]. Group 1: Language Models vs. Video Models - Language models have achieved significant breakthroughs by using a simple algorithm of next-word prediction combined with reinforcement learning [10][19]. - Despite video data being richer than text data, video models have not developed the same level of complex reasoning capabilities as language models [14][19]. - Language models can leverage human knowledge and reasoning paths found in text, allowing them to answer complex questions that video models cannot [21][22][25]. Group 2: The "Cave" Metaphor - The "Plato's Cave" metaphor is used to describe AI's current state, where it learns from human knowledge but does not truly understand the world [29][32]. - AI's capabilities are seen as a reverse engineering of human cognition rather than independent exploration [33]. - The article suggests that AI should aim to move beyond this "shadow dependency" and interact directly with the physical world for true understanding [34][35]. Group 3: Future Directions for AI - The long-term goal for AI is to break free from reliance on human intermediaries, enabling direct interaction with the physical world [35]. - There is a suggestion that bridging different modalities (visual, language, action) could facilitate this exploration without needing to escape the "cave" [35].