据埃菲社11月17日报道，美国总统特朗普17日坚称，不排除针对委内瑞拉领土采取军事干预的任何选 项，同时表示愿意与委内瑞拉总统马杜罗对话。 据报道，特朗普当天在白宫椭圆形办公室举行的一场活动中表示："我不排除任何可能性，我们必须妥 善处理委内瑞拉相关事宜。" 有记者问及在对委内瑞拉相关目标采取军事打击行动前是否可能与马杜罗对话，特朗普回应称："我或 许会和他谈谈，我向来愿意与各类人士沟通交流。" 目前美国已在加勒比地区加大兵力部署力度，美国防部将此次行动命名为"南方之矛"军事行动。 特朗普评价委内瑞拉总统马杜罗"始终对美国持不友好态度"，并再次指责委内瑞拉政府向美国输送非法 移民，其中还包括"阿拉瓜火车"组织成员。 德里斯科尔还表示，美国陆军已在该地区进行大量训练，还重启了位于巴拿马的丛林作战训练学校，无 论总统要求采取何种行动，陆军都随时准备就绪。 他谈及委内瑞拉政府时补充道："我对委内瑞拉的执政者毫无好感。我热爱委内瑞拉这个国家，也热爱 委内瑞拉人民，但这些执政者对这个国家的所作所为，是绝对无法让人接受的。" 美国陆军部长德里斯科尔在美国哥伦比亚广播公司11月16日播出的节目中表示，陆军将随时准备按照总 ...

来源：中国新闻社综合自参考消息、央视新闻客户端、微博@CCTV国际时讯、新华社等 据埃菲社11月17日报道，美国总统特朗普17日坚称， 不排除针对委内瑞拉领土采取军事干预的任 何选项 ，同时表示愿意与委内瑞拉总统马杜罗对话。 据报道，特朗普当天在白宫椭圆形办公室举行的一场活动中表示：" 我不排除任何可能性，我们 必须妥善处理委内瑞拉相关事宜 。" 有记者问及在对委内瑞拉相关目标采取军事打击行动前是否可能与马杜罗对话，特朗普回应 称：" 我或许会和他谈谈，我向来愿意与各类人士沟通交流 。" 目前美国已在加勒比地区加大兵力部署力度，美国防部将此次行动命名为"南方之矛"军事行动。 国际社会以及美国国会部分议员、人权组织，甚至是美国的盟友都对这些打击行动的合法性提出 了质疑。 特朗普评价委内瑞拉总统马杜罗"始终对美国持不友好态度"，并再次指责委内瑞拉政府向美国输 送非法移民，其中还包括"阿拉瓜火车"组织成员。 他谈及委内瑞拉政府时补充道：" 我对委内瑞拉的执政者毫无好感 。我热爱委内瑞拉这个国家， 也热爱委内瑞拉人民，但这些执政者对这个国家的所作所为，是绝对无法让人 接受的。" 美陆军随时待命对委内瑞拉采取行动 美国 ...

Core Points - The U.S. is sending two survivors from a recent Caribbean attack back to their home countries, Colombia and Ecuador, for detention and prosecution, which alleviates the military from complex legal issues related to drug trafficking suspects [1][2] - Colombian President Petro condemned the U.S. for violating Colombia's sovereignty during the anti-drug operation, which resulted in the death of an innocent fisherman [1] - The U.S. military's operation was aimed at a semi-submersible vessel suspected of drug trafficking, with intelligence confirming the cargo primarily consisted of fentanyl and other illegal drugs [2] Summary by Sections - **U.S. Actions**: The U.S. military attacked a semi-submersible vessel, leading to the rescue of two survivors and the death of two crew members, with the survivors now being sent back to Colombia and Ecuador for legal proceedings [2] - **Colombian Response**: President Petro expressed satisfaction over the survival of the Colombian national but criticized the U.S. for its actions in Colombian waters, labeling it as a violation of sovereignty and a murder of an innocent fisherman [1] - **Drug Trafficking Context**: The operation was part of a broader anti-drug initiative, with the U.S. intelligence indicating that the vessel was carrying significant amounts of fentanyl and other illegal substances [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating military tensions in the Caribbean region, particularly between the United States and Venezuela, with Colombian President Petro accusing the U.S. of waging a "war for oil" under the guise of anti-drug operations [1][3][4]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - The U.S. military has increased its presence in the Caribbean, with reports indicating that troop numbers have risen from 4,500 to 10,000, alongside the deployment of 8 warships and a submarine [7]. - Recent U.S. military actions have included multiple strikes against vessels allegedly involved in drug trafficking, resulting in civilian casualties, which has drawn criticism from various quarters [3][4][6]. - The U.S. Senate recently voted against a proposal to limit President Trump's military actions in the Caribbean, reflecting a lack of consensus on the military strategy [4][5]. Group 2: Colombian and Venezuelan Responses - Colombian President Petro has publicly condemned U.S. military actions, asserting that they are not aimed at combating drug trafficking but rather at seizing oil resources, and he has called for accountability regarding civilian casualties [3][4]. - Venezuela has responded to the heightened military threat by conducting military exercises and preparing defensive measures, with President Maduro warning of retaliation against any U.S. military aggression [7]. - The Venezuelan government has also expressed concerns over the potential for a broader conflict, as diplomatic channels with the U.S. have been severed [5][6]. Group 3: Regional Implications - The situation has raised alarms among neighboring countries, with Brazil deploying additional troops to its border in response to the escalating tensions [7]. - Non-governmental organizations have urged the U.S. Congress to intervene and halt military escalations, citing concerns over human rights violations and the potential for prolonged conflict in the region [7].