Group 1 - The article discusses the concept of the "middle class" and its perceived fragility, suggesting that the notion of a stable middle class may be a constructed ideology rather than a concrete reality [2][3][15] - It highlights the paradox of the middle class identity, which relies on personal investments in assets like housing and education, while these investments are subject to larger systemic risks beyond individual control [12][15] - The term "breaking defense" is introduced as a response to the systemic risks faced by individuals, reflecting their anxiety and discontent in the current socio-economic environment [16][37] Group 2 - The article identifies a narrative vacuum created by the failure of traditional success stories, leading to the emergence of the "middle class breaking defense" narrative as a new, relatable story for many [19][20] - Media and algorithms are described as "anxiety merchants," simplifying complex social issues into emotional narratives that resonate with audiences, particularly on platforms like Xiaohongshu [21][22] - The article notes a growing trend of individuals rejecting the label of "middle class," recognizing the instability of this identity and the pressures it entails [27][29][31] Group 3 - It emphasizes the need for a shift from a "vertical" narrative focused on competition and status to a "horizontal" narrative centered on connection and creation, encouraging individuals to redefine their assets, relationships, and self-identity [42][43][45] - The article suggests that meaningful actions, such as building genuine relationships and developing personal skills, can serve as a form of resistance against the prevailing socio-economic system [46][47]