Core Viewpoint - The article argues that the concept of the middle class is a constructed ideology rather than a stable, objective reality, leading to a sense of instability and anxiety among individuals who identify with this class [3][4][5]. Group 1: Nature of the Middle Class - The middle class is portrayed as a myth that promises upward mobility through personal effort, while obscuring the underlying class struggles [4]. - The identity of the middle class is based on individual narratives rather than solid power structures or real production [4][5]. - The financialization of assets, such as housing, creates a situation where individuals do not own property but rather long-term debt contracts, leading to instability [5]. Group 2: Systemic Risks and Individual Responses - Individuals face systemic risks that are often beyond their control, leading to a phenomenon termed "breaking defense" as a response to these pressures [7][15]. - The media and algorithms play a role in amplifying individual anxieties by simplifying complex social issues into emotionally charged narratives [9]. - The article highlights a growing trend of individuals rejecting the label of "middle class," recognizing the instability of this identity [12][13]. Group 3: The Role of Narratives - The narrative of "breaking defense" fills a void left by the failure of the traditional success story, resonating with many who feel disconnected from their efforts and rewards [8]. - The article discusses how social media platforms contribute to a cycle of anxiety and consumption, creating a commercial loop of anxiety and solutions [9][10]. Group 4: Potential Solutions - The article suggests a shift from a vertical narrative of competition to a horizontal narrative focused on connection and creation, emphasizing the importance of community and personal skills [18]. - It advocates for redefining assets to focus on personal skills and relationships rather than market-dependent valuations [19][20]. - The call to action includes building genuine relationships and self-identity based on intrinsic values rather than consumer symbols [19][20].

Group 1 - The article discusses the concept of the "middle class" and its perceived fragility, suggesting that the notion of a stable middle class may be a constructed ideology rather than a concrete reality [2][3][15] - It highlights the paradox of the middle class identity, which relies on personal investments in assets like housing and education, while these investments are subject to larger systemic risks beyond individual control [12][15] - The term "breaking defense" is introduced as a response to the systemic risks faced by individuals, reflecting their anxiety and discontent in the current socio-economic environment [16][37] Group 2 - The article identifies a narrative vacuum created by the failure of traditional success stories, leading to the emergence of the "middle class breaking defense" narrative as a new, relatable story for many [19][20] - Media and algorithms are described as "anxiety merchants," simplifying complex social issues into emotional narratives that resonate with audiences, particularly on platforms like Xiaohongshu [21][22] - The article notes a growing trend of individuals rejecting the label of "middle class," recognizing the instability of this identity and the pressures it entails [27][29][31] Group 3 - It emphasizes the need for a shift from a "vertical" narrative focused on competition and status to a "horizontal" narrative centered on connection and creation, encouraging individuals to redefine their assets, relationships, and self-identity [42][43][45] - The article suggests that meaningful actions, such as building genuine relationships and developing personal skills, can serve as a form of resistance against the prevailing socio-economic system [46][47]