Core Viewpoint - The 15th National Games, co-hosted by Guangdong, Hong Kong, and Macau, is a significant event that accelerates Hong Kong's development as a "City of Events" and enhances collaboration within the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area [3][4]. Group 1: Event Organization and Participation - The Hong Kong delegation will have over 600 athletes participating in 28 competitive events, along with approximately 270 accompanying staff and medical personnel, totaling over 1,800 participants, the highest since Hong Kong's return in 1997 [4]. - The collaborative preparation for the National Games began over two years ago, with intensive cooperation among the three regions in the past year, including multiple test events organized by Hong Kong [3][4]. Group 2: Cultural and Economic Impact - The National Games serve as a platform to showcase China's sports achievements and promote national identity among Hong Kong citizens through exposure to athletes from various regions [4]. - The event is expected to boost local tourism and the economy, with over 160,000 volunteers forming the largest volunteer team in Hong Kong's history, enhancing the overall experience for visitors [5]. Group 3: Infrastructure and Policy Support - Recent policies aimed at enhancing cross-border travel and tourism have reinforced Hong Kong's role as an international tourism hub, facilitating multi-destination travel for mainland visitors [5]. - The Kai Tak Sports Park, which opened recently, has already attracted over 1.4 million visitors, demonstrating the potential for large-scale events to drive economic benefits across various sectors [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the differences in post-war reflections and responsibilities between Germany and Japan, highlighting how Germany has been recognized for its efforts to confront its past, while Japan's ambiguous stance has led to a lack of trust from neighboring countries like China and South Korea [3][4]. Group 1: Historical Context and Responsibility - Germany has thoroughly addressed its war crimes from the Nazi era and implemented various compensation policies, earning international recognition, whereas Japan's ambiguous attitude towards its war responsibilities has hindered trust from its neighbors [3][4]. - The comparison between Germany and Japan is often made by liberal left intellectuals in Japan, who emphasize Germany's sincere efforts to prevent future atrocities, contrasting it with Japan's perceived irresponsibility in addressing its wartime actions [3][4]. - Right-wing perspectives argue that Japan did not commit systematic genocide like the Nazis and that Germany's apologies were strategically motivated rather than purely moral [3][4]. Group 2: Philosophical and Cultural Differences - The article highlights that Japan lacks a philosopher like Karl Jaspers, who provided a framework for discussing national responsibility in Germany, leading to a more simplistic binary view of guilt in Japan [13][16]. - Japan's post-war discourse on responsibility has been limited to a national framework, failing to adequately differentiate between perpetrators and victims, which has resulted in a blurred understanding of individual accountability [19][21]. - The concept of "total repentance" in Japan, which focuses on national failure rather than acknowledging aggression towards other nations, reflects an inward-looking approach that neglects the need for external accountability [18][19]. Group 3: Political and Social Implications - The maintenance of the emperor system in Japan has contributed to a unique narrative of war responsibility, where the government and military leaders are seen as perpetrators, while the emperor and ordinary citizens are viewed as victims [21][22]. - External pressures from neighboring countries have gradually shifted Japan's anti-war movements to reflect on its aggressions towards others, yet a consensus on the political responsibility of ordinary citizens remains elusive [23][24]. - The article notes that Japan's historical education and discussions around national identity have not reached the depth seen in Germany, where debates have been more philosophical and focused on collective responsibility [32][33].