Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the international backlash against the United States' declaration to "fully close" Venezuelan airspace, which has been criticized as illegal and a threat to international aviation safety and regional stability [1][2][3]. Group 1: Reactions from Latin American Countries - Colombian President Petro condemned the U.S. actions as "completely illegal" and called for an International Civil Aviation Organization meeting to address the issue, emphasizing that U.S. directives should not apply to other countries' airlines [1][2]. - The Colombian Foreign Ministry expressed concern over the U.S. navigation notice, stating that unilateral military actions could create unnecessary tensions and harm regional stability [2]. - Approximately 30 political and social groups in the Dominican Republic issued a joint statement opposing the U.S. declaration, labeling it a violation of international law and a threat to peace and aviation safety in the Caribbean [2]. Group 2: International Responses - Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesperson condemned the U.S. declaration as a "tyrannical act" that violates international aviation transport rules and poses unprecedented threats to international aviation safety [3]. - The International Civil Aviation Organization has not yet commented on the situation, indicating a lack of formal international response [4]. Group 3: U.S. Military Actions and Implications - The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration issued a warning regarding the safety risks for civil aircraft flying over Venezuelan airspace due to increased military activities [4]. - The U.S. has deployed naval forces in the Caribbean under the pretext of drug enforcement, which Venezuela claims is a cover for military pressure and regime change efforts [4][5]. - Recent visits by U.S. military leaders to the Caribbean and agreements with Dominican authorities to allow U.S. military operations highlight the escalating military presence in the region [5].

Core Points - Pakistan's Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif announced retaliatory actions against India following an airstrike that resulted in civilian casualties [2] - The Indian military's missile attack on Pakistan led to at least 31 civilian deaths and 57 injuries, raising concerns over international aviation safety due to the presence of commercial flights during the attack [2] - Pakistan's military responded with cross-border shelling, marking one of the most intense retaliations in years, resulting in at least 13 deaths and over 50 injuries on the Indian side [2][3] Summary by Sections - **Retaliation and Military Actions** - Pakistan plans to take retaliatory measures against India for the recent airstrike [2] - The Indian military has strengthened its defense across land, sea, and air in anticipation of potential retaliatory actions from Pakistan [3] - **Casualties and Damage** - The missile attack by India caused significant civilian casualties, with 31 dead and 57 injured [2] - The attack also targeted critical infrastructure, including a dam in Pakistan-administered Kashmir, posing humanitarian risks [2] - **International Response** - UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for restraint from both India and Pakistan amid escalating tensions [3] - The situation has been exacerbated by previous incidents in April, where tourists in Indian-administered Kashmir were attacked, leading to mutual accusations and military responses [3]