Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the urgent debate held by the United Nations Human Rights Council regarding the attack on Minaab School in Iran, which resulted in the tragic loss of 168 young girls' lives, highlighting the violation of human rights and international humanitarian law [1][3]. Group 1 - The Chinese ambassador to the UN, Jia Guide, expressed deep shock and condemnation over the attack, emphasizing that it represents a severe infringement on human rights and a blatant disregard for international humanitarian law [1][5]. - The root cause of this tragedy is attributed to the unauthorized attacks by the United States and Israel on Iran, which not only resulted in the loss of lives but also escalated conflicts in the Middle East, forcing regional countries into turmoil [5]. - The ambassador called for respect for the sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity of all nations, condemning any actions that violate international law and indiscriminately target civilians and non-military objectives [5]. Group 2 - Jia Guide stressed the importance of resolving all hotspot issues through dialogue and negotiation rather than military force, urging all parties to seize every opportunity for peace and to genuinely initiate the negotiation process [5]. - The article underscores the need for practical actions to protect the basic human rights of people in the region and to maintain peace and stability in the Middle East [5].

Group 1 - Iran's UN representative, Iravani, has sent a letter to the UN protesting against the assassination threats towards Iran's Speaker of Parliament and Foreign Minister, indicating that such threats are rooted in a criminal mindset [1] - Reports suggest that there is a framework for the assassination of Iranian officials that has been systematically implemented since the onset of the current conflict [1] - The US and Israel temporarily removed the names of Iranian officials from their assassination list for 4 to 5 days to facilitate negotiations between the US and Iran [1] Group 2 - The Israeli plan to assassinate the Iranian officials has been confirmed, with their whereabouts reportedly tracked [1] - Pakistan informed the US about the assassination plans, warning that if the officials were killed, Iran would have no one to negotiate with the US [1] - The US requested Israel to temporarily remove the officials from its assassination list to avoid jeopardizing negotiations [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the urgent need for all parties to cease military actions and return to dialogue to prevent further escalation of the situation in the Middle East [1] - The spokesperson highlighted that recent statements from Israeli officials regarding targeting Iranian leaders violate international law and could lead to a cycle of hatred and violence [1] - There is a call for immediate cessation of military actions to avoid greater disasters in the Middle East and globally, with a commitment from China to contribute positively to peace efforts [1] Group 2 - The ongoing military conflicts in the Middle East, particularly the targeting of energy facilities, pose significant threats to international trade routes and regional stability [1] - Concerns have been raised about the potential for nuclear disasters due to escalating tensions, particularly in the context of the Strait of Hormuz [1] - The spokesperson reiterated the importance of dialogue and negotiation to resolve differences and prevent the spread of conflict [1]

Core Viewpoint - The attack on Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility is described as a blatant violation of international law by the Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova [1]. Group 1: International Law Violations - The attack is characterized as a gross violation of international law, including the UN Charter and the regulations of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [1]. - Zakharova emphasizes that the actions of the US and Israel against Iran's military, civilian, and nuclear facilities disregard civilian casualties and potential radioactive hazards [1]. Group 2: Call for International Response - The statement calls for the international community, including the United Nations and IAEA leadership, to objectively and uncompromisingly assess such irresponsible actions [1]. - It is noted that these actions pose a real risk of disaster in the Middle East and aim to further undermine peace, stability, and security in the region [1].

Group 1: Iran's Position and Actions - Iran's President Pezeshkian stated that Iran does not seek conflict with Islamic countries and emphasized the need for the U.S. and Israel to stop their aggressive actions to end the regional conflict [1] - Iran's Foreign Minister Araqchi demanded a complete end to the war and compensation for damages, rejecting any temporary ceasefire [1] - The Iranian Revolutionary Guard announced the launch of new military operations targeting over 55 Israeli military facilities and U.S. bases in the Middle East, utilizing modern combat systems [1] Group 2: Israel's Military Actions - Israel's Defense Minister Katz indicated that Israel, in coordination with the U.S., will significantly increase military strikes against Iran in the coming week [3] - The Israeli Defense Forces reported conducting large-scale airstrikes on ballistic missile production facilities in Tehran [4] - U.S. military actions included an attack on Iran's Natanz uranium enrichment facility, which did not result in any leakage according to the International Atomic Energy Agency [2][5] Group 3: U.S. Military Strategy - U.S. President Trump mentioned that the U.S. is "very close" to achieving its goals and is considering a gradual de-escalation of military actions against Iran [7] - The U.S. is deploying three additional warships and approximately 2,500 Marines to the Middle East, with plans to potentially occupy or blockade Iran's oil export hub [8] - Reports indicate that the U.S. is developing strategic plans to seize Iran's nuclear reserves [8] Group 4: International Reactions - Russia's President Putin expressed solidarity with Iran, condemning U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities as violations of international law [9] - A joint statement from 22 countries, including the UAE, condemned Iran's attacks on commercial shipping and infrastructure, urging Iran to cease threats to maritime navigation in the Strait of Hormuz [10]

Group 1 - Iran warns Japan that if U.S. military bases in Japan are used to attack Iran, it will retaliate against Japan and prohibit Japanese vessels from passing through the Strait of Hormuz [1] - A recent poll indicates that 82% of Japanese respondents do not support U.S. military action against Iran, with only 9% in favor [2] - The poll also reveals that 90% of respondents feel uneasy about the economic impact of military action against Iran, with 53% expressing strong concern and 37% feeling somewhat concerned [3] Group 2 - Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's lack of a clear stance on the legality of potential military action has led to 51% of respondents disapproving of his position, while only 34% approve [2] - The approval for military action among the ruling Liberal Democratic Party supporters is at 53%, but only 22% among non-partisan groups [2] - International condemnation of military action against Iran has been noted, with Spain and other countries asserting that such actions violate international law [2]

End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c n e n e rg y） 编辑丨赵方婷 瑞士联邦委员兼国防、民防和体育部长马丁·普菲斯特表示，美国和以色列袭击伊朗违反 国际法。 瑞士联邦委员兼国防、民防和体育部长马丁·普菲斯特在瑞士《每日导报》网站8日刊载的 一篇专访中表示，美国和以色列袭击伊朗违反国际法。 普菲斯特在专访中对中东地区局势升级表示担忧。他说， 瑞士联邦委员会认为，美以对 伊朗的袭击违反国际法，违反禁止暴力原则。 普菲斯特呼吁冲突各方停止暴力、保护平 民。 来源：新华社 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for "middle powers" like Canada and Australia to strengthen cooperation and actively participate in establishing new international rules, rather than allowing hegemonic countries to dominate the global landscape [1]. Group 1: International Cooperation - Canadian Prime Minister Carney advocates for middle powers to make a critical choice: to proactively create international agreements and collaborate on rules that affect their security and prosperity, or to let hegemonic nations dictate terms [1]. - Carney's remarks highlight the urgency for middle powers to engage in shaping international norms to ensure their interests are represented [1]. Group 2: Criticism of Hegemonic Actions - Carney publicly criticized the military actions taken by the United States and Israel against Iran, calling for a de-escalation of the conflict [1]. - He pointed out that these actions were taken without the involvement of the United Nations or consultation with allies, including Canada, indicating a failure of the international order [1]. Group 3: Call for Respecting International Law - The Prime Minister reiterated that international law is binding on all parties involved in conflicts and urged all nations, including the U.S. and Israel, to respect international norms of engagement [1]. - He expressed concern over the escalating threats to civilian lives due to the ongoing conflict, emphasizing the need for adherence to established international conduct [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian permanent mission to the United Nations refutes claims of Iran blocking the Strait of Hormuz, asserting that Iran adheres to international law and maintains freedom of navigation [1] Group 1 - The Iranian representative states that the allegations of blocking the Strait of Hormuz are baseless and absurd [1] - The representative claims that the real threat to maritime security is the United States, citing an incident where an Iranian frigate was sunk by a U.S. submarine, resulting in over 100 sailors' deaths [1] - The incident is described as a reckless attack that violates international law and the fundamental principles of freedom of navigation [1]

Group 1 - The Spanish government has ruled out negotiations with the United States regarding the use of Rota and Morón military bases in the context of a potential invasion of Iran, emphasizing this as a matter of national sovereignty [1] - Spanish Foreign Minister Alvarez stated that the important factor is the decision of the Spanish government, which is clear and firm, and he will not engage in discussions with any representatives from the U.S. [1] - Alvarez highlighted that Spain stands on the side of international law, advocating for de-escalation and a return to the negotiation table [1]