Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the imbalance between the commercial interests of online recruitment platforms and the job-seeking needs of users, leading to a dual dilemma for both job seekers and employers [1][2][10] - Job seekers report a response rate of less than 5% when applying through various platforms, indicating a significant inefficiency in the job matching process [2][4] - Many job postings remain active on platforms even after positions are filled, primarily to avoid additional costs for employers, resulting in a proliferation of "zombie jobs" that complicate the job search for applicants [2][9] Group 2 - Recruitment platforms often charge job seekers for premium services that promise enhanced visibility and response rates, but the actual benefits are often limited and may not justify the costs [4][5][6] - The pricing structure for resume optimization services varies based on the applicant's work experience, with costs ranging from ¥398 to ¥898, which may disadvantage economically weaker candidates [6][9] - A significant portion of the revenue for recruitment platforms comes from employers, with platforms like BOSS Zhipin deriving over 99% of their income from the employer side, rather than from job seekers [11][12] Group 3 - The current job market is characterized by a structural mismatch between the supply of job seekers and the demand for positions, exacerbated by the concentration of applicants on a limited number of popular roles [11][12] - The challenges faced by job seekers, particularly those from economically disadvantaged backgrounds, are compounded by their limited access to resources and networks, which can hinder their job search efforts [7][9] - Experts suggest that recruitment platforms need to evolve beyond merely serving as matching tools and should actively work to improve the efficiency of job connections and user experience [10][12]