Core Viewpoint - The UCCA Center for Contemporary Art in Beijing is hosting two solo exhibitions featuring artists Chen Ke and Liao Fei, focusing on the reinterpretation of historical art movements and the contributions of marginalized creators [1][2]. Group 1: Chen Ke's Exhibition - The exhibition "Chen Ke: Nameless Bauhaus" showcases over 60 works created since 2020, particularly the "Bauhaus Girl" series, emphasizing the contributions of female artists from the Bauhaus school [1][2]. - Chen Ke, born in 1978 in Sichuan, is recognized for her impactful visual expressions that explore the complexities of individual emotions within social and historical contexts [1][2]. - The exhibition highlights the often-overlooked artistic contributions of women in the weaving workshop of the Bauhaus, showcasing their significant influence on textile art [1][2]. Group 2: Liao Fei's Exhibition - The exhibition "Liao Fei: As If One Has Eyes" represents Liao Fei's most systematic solo exhibition since he began his artistic career in 2006, focusing on five core concepts: material, field, extension, infinity, and deduction [2]. - The exhibition includes Liao Fei's early works that explore the relationships and tensions between materials, as well as new pieces from his "Handwriting Space" series and "Unidirectional Sculpture" [2]. - Liao Fei's works aim to challenge traditional sculpture's limitations by merging logical thinking with artistic expression, transforming abstract concepts into tangible visual experiences [2].

Group 1 - The concept of "field" is defined as an intangible network of relationships, forces, meanings, and possibilities that shapes individual behaviors and experiences within it [4][11][14] - Each "field" operates with its own unique logic and rules, creating a distinct atmosphere and value system, which can be seen as a "small world" within the larger societal context [5][6][10] - The interaction between the "small world" and the "big world" reveals a shared structural logic, where different fields may exhibit common patterns in how they generate and distribute influence [6][7][15] Group 2 - The dual nature of "field" involves both an invisible structure that influences individuals and the active role individuals play in redefining that structure through their practices [11][15][18] - The "field" is sustained by collective experiences and historical sedimentation, which guide and shape individual perceptions and actions [14][18][24] - The dynamic interplay between structure and action within a "field" creates a continuous process of generation, allowing for both stability and potential transformation [15][18][31] Group 3 - Individuals assume roles within a "field," which are not merely chosen but are dictated by the structural demands of that field, akin to wearing a mask that allows for existence within that space [22][24][26] - The essence of individuals in a "field" is reflected in their responsibility towards a specific structural position, which they actively interpret and potentially challenge [24][28][40] - The notion of freedom within a "field" is tied to the awareness of one's role and the ability to navigate and create within the constraints of that role [28][30][40]