Core Viewpoint - The recent revision of fund naming regulations by the exchange aims to address the long-standing issue of similar fund names, particularly for ETFs, enhancing clarity and reducing confusion for investors [1][6]. Group 1: ETF Naming Regulations - The revised guidelines specify that ETF names must include the fund manager's name and adhere to a structured format, with existing ETFs required to complete renaming by March 31, 2026 [2][6]. - Current ETF naming practices have led to a significant number of products having similar names, often lacking clarity regarding the fund manager and investment focus [2][3]. Group 2: General Fund Naming Issues - The problem of similar names is not limited to ETFs; traditional funds also exhibit a high degree of name similarity, often using generic terms like "value" and "growth," which complicates investor recognition [4][5]. - As of November 20, there are 363 funds named with "value" and over 470 with "growth," indicating a trend of redundancy in naming conventions across the industry [5]. Group 3: Recommendations for Fund Naming - Experts suggest that fund names should retain complete and accurate information about the fund manager and investment type to enhance investor understanding and recognition [8]. - It is recommended to avoid overused terms and instead use distinctive and memorable names that reflect the fund's investment style or risk-return characteristics [8].

Core Viewpoint - The recent revision of the fund business handling notice by the exchange aims to standardize the naming of ETF products, addressing the long-standing issue of similar fund names in the industry [1][6]. Group 1: ETF Naming Regulations - The new regulations specify that ETF names must include the fund manager's name and follow a clear structure, with existing ETFs required to complete renaming by March 31, 2026 [2][6]. - Currently, over 1,300 ETF products are traded in the secondary market, but many lack the fund manager's name, leading to confusion among similar products [2][3]. - The naming structure for ETFs should include "core investment elements + ETF" and for enhanced ETFs, "core investment elements + enhanced + ETF" [2][6]. Group 2: General Fund Naming Issues - The problem of similar names is not limited to ETFs; ordinary funds also face significant naming overlap, with common terms like "value" and "growth" being frequently used [4][5]. - As of November 20, there are 363 funds named with "value" and over 470 with "growth," indicating a trend of redundancy in fund naming [5][6]. - The lack of distinctive names makes it difficult for investors to identify the type and investment direction of funds, as many names do not include essential information [5][6]. Group 3: Recommendations for Fund Naming - Fund managers are advised to retain complete and accurate information about the fund manager in the name, avoiding abbreviations that may mislead [7]. - It is recommended to include identifiers that reflect the fund's investment type, such as "stock" for equity funds and "mixed" for hybrid funds, aligning with ETF naming rules [7]. - Fund names should be memorable and avoid overused terms, encouraging communication between fund companies and managers to highlight investment styles or risk-return characteristics [7].