Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the meeting between Russian President Putin and U.S. President Trump has not been canceled but postponed, with potential for a later meeting [3] - Dmitriev, the Russian special representative, indicated that Russia, the U.S., and Ukraine are close to a diplomatic solution to the Ukraine crisis, although no specific details were provided [3] - Trump initially announced a meeting in Budapest but later stated it was canceled, expressing doubts about achieving desired outcomes [3] Group 2 - Putin responded to Trump's statements by suggesting that the meeting is likely postponed rather than canceled, emphasizing the importance of dialogue over conflict [3] - The last communication between the two leaders involved discussions about the meeting's timing and location, which were proposed by the U.S. side [3]

Core Points - The EU leaders from 26 countries issued a statement on the Ukraine situation, emphasizing that any diplomatic solution must uphold Ukraine's and Europe's significant security interests [1] - Hungary did not participate in the statement [1] - The statement asserts that a just and lasting peace, which can bring stability and security, must be based on respect for international law, and meaningful negotiations cannot begin without Ukraine's involvement [1] - It is only possible to engage in meaningful negotiations under conditions of a ceasefire or de-escalation of hostilities [1] - The EU will coordinate actions with the US and other partners to continue providing political, economic, military, and diplomatic support to Ukraine, as well as support Ukraine's EU accession process and maintain sanctions against Russia [1] - US and Russian leaders are scheduled to meet on August 15 in Alaska to discuss the Ukraine crisis, with reports indicating that US President Trump had previously communicated with European leaders about plans for talks with Russian and Ukrainian leaders, excluding any European leaders from participation [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that any diplomatic solution regarding the Ukraine crisis must protect the significant security interests of Europe and Ukraine [1][2] - European leaders, including the UK, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Finland, expressed support for US President Trump's efforts to resolve the Ukraine crisis, highlighting the importance of continued military and financial support for Ukraine [1] - The statement underlines that meaningful negotiations can only occur with Ukraine's participation and under conditions of ceasefire or reduced hostilities [2] Group 2 - The article mentions that European countries will continue to provide substantial military and financial support to Ukraine through a "volunteer alliance" while maintaining restrictive measures against Russia [1] - Trump's recent communication with European leaders indicated a plan to meet with Russian President Putin, but it raised concerns about the trustworthiness of Europe within NATO [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is the support from six European leaders and the EU Commission President for the upcoming meeting between US President Trump and Russian President Putin to address the Ukraine crisis, emphasizing the need to protect the security interests of Europe and Ukraine [1] - The joint statement from the leaders of France, Italy, Germany, Poland, the UK, and Finland highlights the importance of continuing support for Ukraine and applying pressure on Russia [1] - The statement asserts that a diplomatic solution must safeguard the significant security interests of Ukraine and Europe, and that Ukraine's participation is essential for determining its path to peace [1] Group 2 - Trump announced the meeting with Putin will take place on August 15 in Alaska, which was later confirmed by a Russian presidential aide [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Grossi, emphasized the significant role of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in promoting diplomatic solutions, even amidst intense rhetoric during wartime [1] Group 1 - The NPT has consistently played an important role in global nuclear non-proliferation efforts [1] - Despite the challenges posed by war, there is a continued commitment to pursue diplomatic resolutions [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Grossi, emphasizes the importance of finding a durable diplomatic solution, highlighting the potential for achieving such a resolution and urging not to miss this opportunity [1] Group 1 - The timeframe for achieving a solution is flexible, whether it takes two months or three months, the focus should be on a solution that withstands the test of time [1] - There exists a possibility for a diplomatic resolution, indicating a significant opportunity for progress in negotiations [1]

Core Viewpoint - The White House Press Secretary Levitt stated that Trump remains interested in diplomatic solutions regarding the issue with Iran [1] Group 1 - The current situation in the Middle East is being closely monitored [1] - There is an ongoing subscription service for updates on the U.S. vs Iran dynamics [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that European foreign ministers remain committed to diplomatic solutions, but there are significant concerns regarding the escalation of war [1] - Any actions by Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz would be considered extremely dangerous [1]

Group 1 - Canadian Prime Minister Carney calls for all parties to return to the negotiating table to reach a diplomatic solution and end the crisis [1] - The resolution of the Iran crisis should lead to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza, as agreed by G7 leaders [1]

Core Viewpoint - The UK Prime Minister, Keir Starmer, emphasizes the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table and seek a diplomatic solution to end the current crisis [1] Group 1 - The UK government is advocating for diplomatic engagement with Iran to resolve ongoing tensions [1] - The call for negotiations indicates a shift towards prioritizing dialogue over military or punitive measures [1] - The statement reflects the UK's broader foreign policy approach aimed at stabilizing the region through diplomacy [1]