Core Viewpoint - Iran has enacted a law to suspend cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), citing accusations that the IAEA is biased towards Western nations and has provided justification for Israeli airstrikes [1] Group 1: Legislative Actions - The law implemented by President Raisi requires that any future inspections of Iran's nuclear facilities by the IAEA must receive approval from Tehran's Supreme National Security Council [1] Group 2: International Relations - Iran's Foreign Minister, Amir-Abdollahian, stated that the bombing of Iran's key Fordow nuclear facility by the U.S. has "severely damaged" the site [1] - The law comes in the wake of a vote by the IAEA Board of Governors declaring Iran in violation of its obligations under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) [1]

Core Viewpoint - French President Macron emphasizes the urgent need for Iran to fulfill its obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, particularly in fully cooperating with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [1] Group 1 - The French government is advocating for Iran's compliance with international nuclear agreements [1] - The emphasis is placed on the importance of cooperation with the IAEA to ensure nuclear non-proliferation [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Grossi, emphasized the significant role of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in promoting diplomatic solutions, even amidst intense rhetoric during wartime [1] Group 1 - The NPT has consistently played an important role in global nuclear non-proliferation efforts [1] - Despite the challenges posed by war, there is a continued commitment to pursue diplomatic resolutions [1]

Group 1 - Iran claims that the recent U.S. attacks on its nuclear facilities have caused "irreparable damage" to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), rendering it ineffective [1] - Iranian representative Reza Najafi stated that the U.S. actions represent aggression and fundamentally undermine the international nuclear non-proliferation regime [1] - Following the U.S. attacks on June 21, Iran confirmed that its facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan were targeted, but no signs of nuclear contamination were found [1] Group 2 - Iranian parliament's National Security Committee suggests the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime route for global oil trade [2] - If the Strait of Hormuz is closed, global oil prices could rise significantly, with Goldman Sachs analysts predicting Brent crude could spike to $110 per barrel if oil transport flows decrease by half for a month [2] - A reduction of 1.75 million barrels per day from Iran could push Brent oil prices to a peak of $90 per barrel [2]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Foreign Minister emphasizes that while Iran is a committed member of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), the treaty does not provide adequate protection for the country [1] Group 1 - Iran questions the reliance on the NPT for peaceful nuclear activities, suggesting that countries like Iran, which aim to develop peaceful nuclear energy, may not find the treaty beneficial [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Atomic Energy Organization announced that its nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan were attacked, which they claim violates international law and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, labeling it as a hostile act against Iran [1] Summary by Relevant Categories - **International Relations** - The Iranian government calls for international condemnation of the attack, describing it as a "lawless act based on the law of the jungle" [1] - The statement emphasizes the need for global support for Iran to maintain its legitimate rights [1] - **Nuclear Industry** - The Iranian Atomic Energy Organization asserts its commitment to continue developing its nuclear energy industry despite the attack [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Grossi, stated that the agency will continue its presence in Iran as long as safety conditions allow, emphasizing the ongoing verification and monitoring of Iran's nuclear activities in accordance with its obligations under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons [1] Group 1 - The IAEA will maintain its operations in Iran to ensure compliance with nuclear verification obligations [1] - The continuation of monitoring activities is contingent upon the safety conditions in Iran [1] - Iran's commitment to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons is highlighted as a key factor for ongoing oversight [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson announced that the parliament is preparing a proposal to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) [1] Group 1 - The Iranian parliament is actively working on a legislative proposal regarding the potential exit from the NPT [1]

Core Viewpoint - Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister announced new special protective measures for the country's nuclear facilities, stating that these measures will not be reported to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [1] Group 1 - Iran will implement new protective measures for its nuclear facilities [1] - The country will not inform the IAEA about these measures [1] - Iran threatens to withdraw from the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons if comprehensive sanctions are reimposed [1]