据媒体报道，11月12日下午，朱先生诉天津银行济南分行违规向在校学生发放互联网贷款案在济南市市中区人民法院开庭，朱先生要求对方退还自己在读研 期间所借网贷的利息。最终，双方在庭审前达成和解。经过协商，双方最终就相关问题达成一致，银行方面向朱先生退还研究生在读期间贷款产生的利息 2186.53元，朱先生同意撤诉。 2021年原银保监会等五部门发布的《关于进一步规范大学生互联网消费贷款监督管理工作的通知》（以下简称"《通知》"）显示，小额贷款公司要加强贷款 客户身份的实质性核验，不得将大学生设定为互联网消费贷款的目标客户群体，不得针对大学生群体精准营销，不得向大学生发放互联网消费贷款。放贷机 构外包合作机构要加强获客筛选，不得采用虚假、引人误解或者诱导性宣传等不正当方式诱导大学生超前消费、过度借贷，不得针对大学生群体精准营销， 不得向放贷机构推送引流大学生。 《通知》指出，银行业金融机构要严守风险底线，审慎开展大学生互联网消费贷款业务，建立完善相适应的风险管理制度和预警机制，加强贷前调查评估， 重视贷后管理监督，确保风险可控。未经银行业监督管理部门或地方金融监督管理部门批准设立的机构不得为大学生提供信贷服务。 据 ...

Group 1 - The core issue involves Tianjin Bank being sued for allegedly issuing loans to students, which is against regulatory guidelines [1] - The case was brought by a graduate student, Mr. Zhu, who sought the return of interest paid on loans taken during his studies, resulting in a settlement where the bank refunded him 2,186.53 yuan [1] - Tianjin Bank's response to the allegations was limited, indicating a lack of awareness regarding the specific case [1] Group 2 - Regulatory guidelines from the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission prohibit financial institutions from targeting university students for internet consumer loans [2] - The guidelines emphasize the need for substantial identity verification of loan clients and restrict banks from issuing loans to students without proper oversight [2] - Financial institutions are required to establish risk management systems and conduct thorough assessments before granting loans to ensure risks are manageable [2]