以数字技术赋能，该区纪委监委深化运用大数据监督模型，用好甘肃省乡村振兴监督信息平台，持续加 强数据比对碰撞和综合分析，精准高效发现问题线索。 "我腿脚不方便，一直没去换社保卡，没想到今天在家就给办好了！"该区纪委监委紧盯惠民惠农补贴资 金管理、发放等关键环节，从小处着手、在实处发力，与职能部门、乡镇街道同向发力、同题共答，推 动解决群众急难愁盼问题，不断增强群众获得感幸福感安全感。（甘肃省纪委监委 || 责任编辑 刘靖 晗） 该区纪委监委将惠民惠农补贴资金落实作为维护群众切身利益的着力点，将农业补贴、困难救助等补贴 资金发放管理列入监督重点，强化日常监督和问题整治，保障惠民惠农资金真正用之于民、惠及于民。 该区纪委监委点题监督，统筹用好区乡村三级监督力量，综合运用"协作+交叉""室组+部门""包联+驻 点"等监督机制，通过监督联动、案件联办、信息联享、成果联用，深挖政策落实过程中的堵点难点， 严肃查处失职失责、虚报冒领等问题。截至目前，查处相关领域腐败和作风问题12件，立案8件，处分9 人。 "违规发放的补助金已经缴还财政专户。"近日，甘肃省兰州市七里河区纪委监委工作人员对该区民政局 电话回访时得到答复。 此 ...

Core Insights - The case of Han, the village head of Fufeng Village in Changchun's Qika District, highlights serious violations related to false reporting for land compensation, leading to strict disciplinary actions [1] - The investigation utilized a big data supervision model developed by the Jilin Provincial Discipline Inspection Commission, which enabled the identification of discrepancies in land compensation data [1] - The Changchun Qika District Discipline Inspection Commission has implemented a collaborative model involving various departments to enhance efficiency in case handling and supervision [1][2] Group 1 - The big data supervision model includes comparisons of land compensation ranges and original compensation data, revealing issues of false claims by officials [1] - The model covers various areas such as subsistence allowances and land compensation, improving case handling efficiency through data analysis and pre-warning mechanisms [1] - A collaborative approach has been established, involving the integration of resources from different inspection bodies and the implementation of joint mechanisms for case handling [1] Group 2 - A regular communication model with functional departments has been established to ensure accurate and timely data collection and verification [2] - The focus is on key livelihood projects, including the implementation of welfare policies and property registration, with a demand list and work plan created for tracking effectiveness [2] - The Changchun Qika District Discipline Inspection Commission has issued 11 disciplinary suggestions and conducted 45 discussions with department heads to address identified risks and improve institutional mechanisms [2]