生态环境部联合中国人民银行、国家税务总局，近日共同发布《关于加强重点行业大气环境绩效分级管 理的指导意见》，进一步完善管理体系，严格开展绩效分级，推进差异化管理，促进空气质量改善与行 业高质量发展双赢。 来源：央视新闻客户端 所有指标达到行业先进水平的评为A级，对采用国际领先且能够连续稳定运行两年以上的创新 性、突破性装备或技术，减污降碳效果显著、明显比同行业先进的其他A级企业，还可评定为 A+企业； 相关指标达到行业良好水平的为B级， 达到行业中等水平的为C级， 符合法律法规及相关标准最基本要求的划为D级。 生态环境部门基于绩效分级实施差异化管理：在重污染天气应急响应期间，A级及以上企业可自主采取 减排措施，B级企业可少采取应急减排措施，绩效等级低的企业依法依规严格采取应急减排措施。符合 条件的绩效等级先进企业被优先纳入生态环境监督执法正面清单，一般不进行现场执法检查。在大气污 染防治重点区域、生态环境优先保护单元内，符合法律法规的新、改、扩建项目，绩效可达A级水平的 将被优先支持。对不新增用地、以设备更新为主且不增加污染物排放的绩效等级提升项目，在法律政策 允许范围内将被优先支持。 鼓励地方出台激励政策， ...

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Ecology and Environment, in collaboration with the People's Bank of China and the State Taxation Administration, has issued guidelines to enhance air quality management through a performance grading system for key industries, aiming for a dual win in air quality improvement and high-quality industry development [1][2]. Group 1: Performance Grading System - A national unified performance grading platform will be established to evaluate enterprises based on equipment, processes, clean energy, pollution control, and air pollutant emission levels [1]. - Enterprises with A-grade and above can autonomously implement emission reduction measures during heavy pollution weather, while B-grade enterprises have reduced obligations, and lower-grade enterprises face stricter regulations [1]. - Advanced enterprises with high performance ratings will be prioritized for inclusion in the positive list for environmental supervision, reducing the likelihood of on-site inspections [1]. Group 2: Support for High-Performance Enterprises - Local governments are encouraged to introduce incentive policies to support performance improvement projects and reward enterprises that achieve upgrades [2]. - Advanced performance enterprises will receive preferential treatment in areas such as electricity pricing, credit management, loan approvals, tax reductions, and green procurement [2]. Group 3: Grading Criteria - Enterprises achieving all indicators at the industry-leading level are rated as A-grade, while those using internationally leading and stable innovative equipment or technologies with significant pollution reduction effects can be rated A+ [3]. - B-grade is assigned to enterprises meeting good industry standards, C-grade for those at medium levels, and D-grade for those meeting only the basic legal and regulatory requirements [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Ecology and Environment is enhancing the management of air quality performance grading in key industries to promote green and low-carbon transformation and high-quality development [1][2]. Group 1: Performance Grading System - The performance grading system is a significant institutional innovation for air quality management and serves as a crucial tool for advancing green and low-carbon transformation in key industries [1][2]. - The draft guidance document has been released for public consultation, indicating a move towards more structured performance grading [1][2]. - The performance grading policy has received recognition from industry enterprises, with a steady increase in the number of A-grade enterprises, leading to improved overall governance and pollution reduction [1][2]. Group 2: Grading Criteria and Implementation - The current performance grading is based on the "Technical Guidelines for Emergency Emission Reduction Measures in Key Industries during Heavy Pollution Weather," which includes 39 key industries [2]. - The proposed grading system categorizes performance into four levels: A, B, C, and D, with A representing the highest standards [2][3]. - The grading assessment follows a "shortboard principle," where the lowest score among indicators determines the overall performance grade for enterprises involved in multiple key industries [3]. Group 3: Encouraging Innovation and Oversight - To encourage continuous innovation, the Ministry plans to select "exemplary enterprises" from A-grade companies that utilize internationally leading technologies with significant pollution reduction effects [6][7]. - A periodic review mechanism for advanced performance grades will be established to prevent complacency among rated enterprises [6][7]. - The draft also emphasizes the need for a differentiated management approach based on performance levels across various sectors, including finance, taxation, and regulatory measures [7].