Group 1 - The case of Zhai Xinxin highlights significant changes in criminal policy regarding extortion and the complexities of defining financial claims within marriage [3][4][6] - The lengthy litigation process, spanning over six years, indicates that the case is not merely a straightforward extortion case, but involves intricate legal interpretations of marital financial disputes [3][5] - The court's decision to classify the financial claims as not constituting extortion reflects a cautious approach to the intersection of criminal and civil law, particularly in the context of short marriages [6][11] Group 2 - The narrative surrounding "gold diggers" and its impact on gender equality reveals societal biases that oversimplify complex individual behaviors into broader stereotypes [7][10] - The emergence of games and media that perpetuate negative stereotypes about women in financial relationships exacerbates gender tensions and societal divisions [8][9] - The case reflects deeper issues within the marriage market, including economic disparities and the traditional gender roles that influence relationship dynamics [11][12][14]