学术传播
Search documents
西安电子科技大学举办研究生学术三分钟演讲比赛
Huan Qiu Wang· 2025-11-04 08:10
来源:环球网 10月31日,由西安电子科技大学党委研究生工作部主办、中兴通讯鼎力支持的第一届"中兴杯"研究生学 术三分钟演讲比赛落幕。经初赛选拔,20位科研"尖兵"从50名候选人中脱颖而出,晋级决赛。他们用 180秒精练表达让前沿成果"落地",既实现自我突破,又带观众开启跨学科认知之旅。 决赛现场,选手们各展所长,将硬核科研转化为大众语言。1号洪文以《芯片的"降温大师"》为题,用 形象比喻拆解芯片散热技术,迅速点燃氛围;17号王曙君从"古老智慧"切入,解码针灸背后的科学原 理,搭建传统医学与现代科学的桥梁;20号赵妍压轴登场,以《用算法"看见"深蓝之下》描绘算法在深 海探测中的应用,为比赛画上句号。 备赛中,三分钟时限倒逼选手剥离晦涩术语,注入诸多巧思。11号闫浩浩为让非医学观众理解病毒机制 与药物研发的关联,弃用病理术语,巧用类比、比喻与示意图;15号杨子涵邀请不同专业好友当"听 众",按反馈删改术语、更换比喻,最终实现无人机集群技术的"通俗转译"。这一过程,让选手完成 从"专注研究"到"兼顾传播"的思维转变。 180秒凝智:复杂科研变通俗 跨领域漫游,认知壁垒被消融 赛事也成为连接学术高塔与公众认知的桥梁 ...
【西街观察】对韦神应该“距离产生美”
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-06-10 14:30
Core Points - The phenomenon of "Wei Shen" Wei Dongyi gaining popularity on social media highlights the intersection of academic dissemination, flow logic, and public psychology, especially during the critical period before the college entrance examination [2] - Wei Dongyi's rise to fame is characterized by a stark contrast between his humble persona and his identity as a "mathematical genius," creating a new idol positioning that resonates with the public [3] - The opening of Wei Dongyi's social media account aims to share mathematical content and counteract malicious rumors, while also emphasizing the need for scholars to maintain a peaceful environment for academic work [6] Summary by Sections - **Social Media Impact**: Wei Dongyi's account gained over 24 million followers, with his first video achieving over 10 million new followers within 24 hours and nearly 700 million likes, showcasing the immense public interest in his persona [1][2] - **Public Perception**: The public's fascination with mathematics is embodied in Wei Dongyi, who serves as a relatable figure despite the subject's complexity, providing a sense of delayed gratification for those curious about the field [5] - **Challenges of Fame**: The excessive attention on Wei Dongyi has led to a diversion from academic discussions to sensationalism, with various accounts exploiting his name for traffic, raising concerns about the boundaries of public interest and respect for scholars [6][7]