自2018年2月韩国正式实施《维持生命治疗决定法》（又称"善终法""尊严死法"）以来，签署拒绝维持 生命治疗文件的人数已超300万，占韩国成年人口约6.8%。 这相当于，每14个韩国成年人中，就有1人明确拒绝临终时的插管抢救。 截至目前，已有超过44万韩国人依据该法填写文件后终止维持生命治疗。 7年时间，300万韩国人选择主动"拥抱"死亡。 媒体在惊讶于这个数字的同时，不禁也深思，究竟是什么让他们改变了对死亡的认识？ 一、"想在清醒的时候自己做决定" 2020年9月，来自韩国全罗南道宝城郡的54岁女性申某，在（韩国）顺全南大学医院签下了拒绝延长生 命医疗行为意向书。在此之前，申某已经与肺癌（第4期）斗争了6年。 回家路上，她对女儿说："我想在清醒的时候自己做决定。" 之后的日子，申某戴着家用呼吸辅助器和家人度过了"最后的时光"。三个月后，她因呼吸困难，疼痛加 剧，被送往医院。按照拒绝延长生命医疗行为意向书，申某没有接受心肺复苏手术。于是在缓和医疗 下，两天后，她闭上了眼睛，在自己的选择中安详离世。 面对母亲的选择，申某的女儿全某虽感到难受，但也表示尊重："如果妈妈接受了延长生命的医疗行 为，也许能活得更久一些 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the controversial topic of euthanasia, particularly in the context of a girl with systemic lupus erythematosus who chose assisted dying in Switzerland, which the author disagrees with [5][38]. - The author emphasizes that the discussion around euthanasia is heavily influenced by the legal environment and the concept of "life rights," questioning whether individuals can relinquish their right to life under pressure [11][12]. - The article highlights the differences in attitudes towards euthanasia in various regions, particularly contrasting liberal areas like California with conservative states in the U.S. where religious beliefs strongly oppose such practices [16][21]. Group 2 - The author notes that the global trend towards aging populations and the financial strain on healthcare systems are significant factors driving the discussion on euthanasia legislation [21][26]. - The article mentions that the UK is nearing the approval of euthanasia legislation, driven by a combination of low religious adherence and financial pressures on the National Health Service (NHS) [22][27]. - The author points out that the implementation of euthanasia laws in countries like the UK is expected to be more stringent than in Switzerland, requiring multiple assessments and self-execution of the procedure [30][40]. Group 3 - The article raises concerns about the potential "slippery slope" effect of euthanasia laws, where the criteria for eligibility could gradually expand beyond terminally ill patients [39][42]. - It discusses the perspective of older physicians who prefer to avoid aggressive medical interventions in favor of a dignified end-of-life process, reflecting a shift in societal attitudes towards the quality of life versus the length of life [44][47]. - The author concludes by emphasizing the unpredictability of life and the importance of making the most of one's time, suggesting that individuals should prioritize their desires and experiences [49][50].