作者丨叶映橙 见习记者林健民 编辑丨张楠 11月25日，梦洁股份官微发布《关于网络恶意不实信息的严正声明》称，公司董事陈洁通过个 人自媒体发布 "实名举报" 内容，声称公司及相关高管存在 "设计圈套""请君入瓮" 等不端行 为，相关言论均为主观臆断或恶意捏造，已严重侵害公司及相关高管的名誉权，扰乱资本市场 秩序，涉嫌误导投资者。 公司已向公安机关报案，并启动民事诉讼程序。 近日，21财经《辟谣财知道》注意到，自媒体账号"陈洁披露真相"连日来发布多条涉梦洁股份 （002397.SZ）信息， 称梦洁股份董事长姜天武、董秘李军等人涉嫌合同诈骗与职务侵占，侵 害投资者利益。 而彼时梦洁股份称，天职国际会计师事务所(特殊普通合伙)已就公司2022年度财务报告出具了 标准无保留意见的审计报告。除董事陈洁外，公司董事会其他10名董事、全体监事及高级管理 人员均签署了董事、监事、高级管理人员关于2022年年度报告及2023年一季报的书面确认意 见，保证公司2022年年度报告及2023年一季报内容真实、准确、完整，不存在任何虚假记 载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏。 21财经·南财快讯记者梳理发现，自2023年4月至2025年10月， ...

Core Points - The article discusses a case where a woman named Zeng publicly accused her former in-laws of having significant undisclosed wealth, claiming their family assets to be nearly 100 million yuan [1][8] - The investigation revealed that the reported wealth was exaggerated, with actual verified family assets amounting to approximately 390,000 yuan [7][8] - The investigation concluded that the accused did not misuse their official positions for personal gain, and the results were not publicly disclosed due to privacy concerns [3][10] Group 1: Allegations and Investigation - Zeng accused her former in-laws, Yin and Qi, of having assets far exceeding their official income, including multiple properties and valuable collectibles [8][9] - The investigation was initiated by the Nanchong Development and Reform Commission in response to Zeng's allegations, which included claims of money laundering [9][10] - The investigation team found no evidence of corruption or misuse of power by the accused individuals [7][10] Group 2: Personal Background and Legal Proceedings - Zeng's motivation for the allegations stemmed from dissatisfaction with a divorce settlement, where she received only 50,000 yuan despite her claims of her husband's substantial assets [4][5] - Following the investigation, Zeng and her ex-husband reached a settlement where he agreed to pay her 1.4 million yuan, and both parties agreed not to pursue further claims [6][8] - Zeng's ex-husband, Yin, has been employed in various capacities since their marriage, and the couple's relationship deteriorated leading to the divorce [5][6] Group 3: Financial Details and Asset Verification - The investigation confirmed that the family owned three residential properties and several commercial properties, but the total value was significantly lower than Zeng's claims [7][8] - The family's income sources were identified as salaries, property appreciation, and investment returns, with no evidence of illicit financial activities [7][9] - The investigation included thorough checks of financial records and asset valuations, leading to a clear understanding of the family's actual financial situation [7][10]