洞见 （ DJ00123987 ） —— 不一样的观点，不一样的故事， 3000 万人订阅的微信大号。点击标题下蓝字 " 洞见 " 关注，我们将为您提供有价值、有意思的 延伸阅读。 作者：洞见·姜榆木 真正的成长，往往发生在无人注视的角落。 ♬ 点上方播放按钮可收听洞见主播云湾 朗读音频 我二十多岁那会儿，同学们聚在一起很喜欢开玩笑说自己是"家里蹲大学"毕业的。 这个玩笑多少带点自我调侃的意味，是一种还没找到工作，无所事事的无奈。 然而随着阅历增长，我慢慢发现，"家里蹲"几乎是每个大佬的标配。 歌手李健从国家广电辞职回家，一个人醉心音乐，才有后来登上万众瞩目的舞台； 王小波成名之前，也曾因为长期在家写作，被街坊邻居嘲笑为"无业青年"； 导演饺子转行学动画期间，更是一度靠母亲的退休金接济，最后凭借电影《哪吒》一鸣惊人…… 村上春树曾说： 真正的成长，往往发生在无人注视的角落。 那段看似沉寂的居家时光，并非沉沦，而是生命的一场深耕。 一如种子埋入黑暗，在寂静中汲取养分，默默蓄力，只为最终破土而出，迎接属于它的广阔天地。 TOMS鞋业创始人布莱克·麦考斯基曾因确诊莱姆病，不得不在家休养了将近一年。 病愈后他参加了一 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the alarming rise of "self-reliance support" institutions in Japan that, under the guise of helping "hikikomori" (social recluses), engage in illegal confinement and human rights violations, raising serious ethical concerns about their practices [1][8]. Group 1: Social Context - The term "hikikomori" refers to individuals, particularly aged 15 to 39, who isolate themselves from society, with approximately 1.46 million in this age group and an additional 613,000 aged 40 to 64, indicating a growing societal issue [2][4]. - Factors contributing to this phenomenon include mental health issues, academic pressure, workplace bullying, and a narrow societal definition of success, which creates immense pressure on young people [6][7]. - The traditional family structure in Japan often leads to a disconnect between parents' expectations and children's desires for self-fulfillment, resulting in parents supporting adult children financially, contributing to the "8050 problem" [4][7]. Group 2: The Role of "Pull-Out Houses" - "Pull-out houses" exploit parental anxiety about their children's future by promising to help them reintegrate into society, often through coercive means, including forced removal from homes [8][15]. - These institutions often charge exorbitant fees, with one center claiming a 95% success rate in employment within six months, which appeals to desperate parents [15][16]. - The methods employed by these institutions include confinement, restriction of communication, and even threats of institutionalization, raising serious ethical concerns about their operations [10][11][17]. Group 3: Consequences and Public Response - The negative outcomes of forced removal can exacerbate psychological trauma and family conflicts, counteracting any potential benefits of the so-called support [17][18]. - High-profile cases, such as the tragic death of a young man in a facility, have sparked public outrage and legal actions against these institutions, leading to increased scrutiny of their practices [13][14]. - The article suggests that genuine support for "hikikomori" should focus on understanding and gradual reintegration rather than coercive measures, emphasizing the need for compassion and patience from families [18].