Workflow
巡视整改监督
icon
Search documents
学习贯彻二十届中央纪委四次全会精神丨强化巡视整改监督 推动高质量发展
Group 1 - The meeting focused on implementing the spirit of the Central Eight Regulations and emphasized the importance of supervision in promoting effective results from inspections [3][4] - The meeting highlighted the role of the stationed disciplinary inspection and supervision teams as "permanent inspection teams" in driving inspection rectification and the application of results [3][4] - The core task of inspection work is to uphold the "two safeguards," which refers to maintaining the authority of the Party Central Committee and ensuring the implementation of its decisions [4][5] Group 2 - The meeting stressed the need for political consciousness and loyalty to the Party, urging inspected organizations to align closely with the Central Committee's directives [5][6] - It was emphasized that inspection rectification should be integrated with deepening reforms and strict governance of the Party, ensuring that rectification efforts are practical and effective [5][7] - The importance of a systematic approach to rectification was underscored, with a focus on comprehensive problem recognition and the establishment of clear responsibility lists [8][10] Group 3 - The meeting called for targeted special rectifications to address persistent issues that hinder high-quality development, advocating for a project-based approach to resolve deep-rooted problems [9][10] - It was noted that rectification is a long-term task that requires a systematic approach, emphasizing the need for continuous improvement and the establishment of long-term mechanisms [10][11] - The meeting highlighted the necessity of accountability in rectification efforts, urging inspected organizations to take responsibility and regularly report on their progress [11][12] Group 4 - The need for collaborative supervision across various departments was emphasized, promoting a unified approach to address cross-sectoral regulatory challenges [12][13] - The integration of different supervisory mechanisms was discussed, aiming to create a cohesive and efficient system for inspection rectification [13]
驻东方电气纪检监察组:做深做实巡视整改监督
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing efforts and measures taken by the disciplinary inspection team of China Eastern Electric Group to enhance the effectiveness of supervision and ensure the implementation of rectification following the group's first round of inspections in 2024 [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Supervision and Rectification Measures - The disciplinary inspection team emphasizes the importance of political leadership in rectification, treating supervision as a serious political task and aligning with central inspection requirements [1] - A mechanism for coordinated supervision has been established, integrating various forms of oversight to enhance the effectiveness of rectification efforts [2] - The team has implemented an innovative supervision approach, utilizing technology to create a supervision system platform that promotes regular and efficient oversight [3] Group 2: Accountability and Responsibility - The team focuses on enforcing accountability for rectification, clearly defining responsibilities and ensuring that all parties involved fulfill their roles [4] - Issues such as slow progress and low quality of rectification are addressed through timely notifications and recommendations, ensuring that responsible parties are held accountable [4] - Targeted discussions and reminders are conducted with leaders of units that show significant gaps in rectification efforts, enhancing the urgency and seriousness of the rectification process [4]
中国移动:全流程跟踪问效 深化巡视整改监督
Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of comprehensive supervision and effective implementation of corrective measures in the internal inspection process of China Mobile [1][2][3] - The company has established a "full-process" supervision mechanism to ensure that the focus of corrective actions remains aligned with the intended goals, involving various departments in the review and feedback process [1][2] - A "multi-dimensional" evaluation model has been created to assess the effectiveness of corrective actions taken by the inspected units, focusing on political impact, accountability, root cause management, and long-term mechanisms [2] Group 2 - The company is enhancing its oversight of the corrective action meetings to ensure they are substantive and not merely procedural, with a focus on addressing key issues and fostering a spirit of accountability [3] - The inspection team is committed to integrating corrective actions with broader reforms and governance practices, ensuring that these measures are embedded in daily operations and responsibilities [3]