Core Viewpoint - The case revolves around the determination of whether an employee's death during a company-organized team-building activity should be classified as a work-related injury, raising questions about responsibility and risk acceptance [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - In March 2021, an employee named Li Chengguang participated in a tug-of-war competition organized by a partner construction company, which was deemed a company activity [2]. - After the competition, Li suddenly fell ill and died due to a heart condition, prompting his mother to apply for a work injury recognition [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The local human resources bureau recognized Li's death as a work-related injury based on the circumstances of the incident, but the real estate company contested this decision through administrative litigation [3][6]. - The court found that the tug-of-war event was directly related to the company's business objectives and that Li's participation was mandated by his employer, thus qualifying the incident as a work-related injury [5][6]. Group 3: Court's Rationale - The court emphasized that the activity was organized to enhance team cohesion and had a clear business connection, which justified its classification as an extension of work duties [5][10]. - The judge ruled that Li's participation during work hours and under employer direction did not constitute voluntary risk-taking, but rather a legitimate work-related activity [6][11]. Group 4: Implications for Labor Relations - The case highlights the importance of defining the boundaries between work-related injuries and personal risk, emphasizing the employer's responsibility for employee safety during work-related activities [10][11]. - The ruling reinforces the principle that employers should bear the risks associated with activities that are conducted for the benefit of the company, thereby balancing the rights and responsibilities of both parties in the labor relationship [10][11].