工作之余，公司组织的团建活动本是增进团队情谊的纽带，可当员工在单位组织的集体活动中发生 意外，争议也随之而来——这究竟是参与者自甘风险的个人选择，自己承担责任？还是属于履行职务过 程中的意外，应被纳入工伤范畴？近日，广西壮族自治区贵港市中级人民法院审理了这样一起因员工参 与公司集体活动中突发意外离世，由此引发的工伤认定纠纷案件。 参加公司活动出意外 2021年3月，李成光（化名）入职某置业公司。入职一个多月后，合作方某建设公司为促进双方合 作、强化团队凝聚力，举办销售活动，并设置了拔河比赛活动环节。置业公司作为参与方，表示"这属 于公司组织的集体活动"，便在公司内部工作群通知员工参加，李成光与刘明（化名）被指派参加拔河 比赛。未曾料到，当天下午拔河比赛结束后，李成光突然脸色煞白，感到一阵剧烈的不适，被紧急送往 医院。虽经医院全力抢救，李成光还是在送医当天因右室心肌病引发心跳骤停离世。 2022年1月，李成光的母亲曾芸（化名）向人社局提出工伤认定申请，同年5月23日又补正了相关申 请材料。5月25日，人社局依法受理后，对刘明在内的相关人员进行了调查询问。刘明回忆说，李成光 是其下属业务员，工作内容为学习房地产知 ...

工伤认定需要提供哪些证明？人社部解答 图片来源：人力资源和社会保障部微信公众号 来源：中国新闻网 中新网9月24日电 工伤认定需要提供哪些证明？人社部9月24日通过官方微信公众号作出解答。 根据《工伤保险条例》等有关规定，申请工伤认定应当提交工伤认定申请表，需要提供事故发生的时间、地点、原因以及职工伤害程度等基本情况以及相应 证据。 证据类型可以是证人证言、现场照片，也可以是其他形式的证据材料。 编辑：徐世明 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 ...

Core Points - The case involves a labor dispute regarding whether a labor relationship was established during pre-job training and if an injury sustained during this period can be classified as a work-related injury [1][2] - The court ruled that a labor relationship existed between the employee and the restaurant, as the employee was engaged in training arranged by the employer, which was directly related to the restaurant's main business [2] - The court emphasized that if the pre-job training is necessary, employer-arranged, and the employee is under the employer's management, a labor relationship can be recognized [2] Summary by Sections - **Labor Relationship Establishment**: The court found that communication and arrangements for pre-job training indicated a mutual agreement to establish a labor relationship, despite the absence of a formal written contract [2] - **Injury Recognition**: The court highlighted that injuries occurring during employer-arranged training can be recognized as work-related injuries if a factual labor relationship exists [2][3] - **Next Steps**: Following the confirmation of the labor relationship, the case will proceed to work injury recognition and compensation negotiations [3]

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that the injury sustained by the worker during the commute, despite leaving work early, qualifies as a work-related injury under the Workers' Compensation Insurance Regulations [1][2]. Group 1: Case Background - A labor dispatch company sent a worker, Wei, to perform security duties in Urumqi in October 2018. Wei was injured in a traffic accident while walking home after leaving work early on November 4, 2018 [1]. - The labor dispatch company argued that Wei's early departure violated company rules and should not be considered as part of the normal commute, thus contesting the work injury designation [1]. Group 2: Court's Ruling - The court upheld the decision that injuries occurring during the commute, even if the worker bears equal responsibility for the accident, should be recognized as work-related injuries [2]. - The court emphasized that while Wei's early departure was a violation of labor discipline, it did not reach the level of intentional wrongdoing that would negate the work injury classification [2]. Group 3: Legal Interpretation - The court's interpretation aligns with the Workers' Compensation Insurance Regulations, which state that injuries sustained during the commute, when not primarily the worker's fault, are eligible for work injury recognition [3]. - The ruling aims to ensure comprehensive protection under the work injury insurance system, acknowledging the risks workers face during their commutes [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Seoul Administrative Court ruled that the death of a man from acute alcohol poisoning after attending three consecutive company dinners in July 2022 should be classified as a work-related injury, overturning a previous decision by the Korean Workers' Compensation and Welfare Corporation [1][2] Group 1: Legal Context - The key legal issue revolves around whether the last dinner constituted a work-related event, with the deceased's family suing to overturn the corporation's refusal to pay compensation for bereavement and funeral expenses [2] - The corporation argued that the last dinner was of a private nature and that the costs were borne by individuals, thus not meeting the criteria for a formal company event [2] Group 2: Court's Rationale - The court determined that the dinner had a clear work-related context, as the deceased was about to undertake a six-month overseas assignment and the dinner involved two new foreign employees who would assist him in that role [2] - The court noted that the high cost of the dinner, exceeding 1 million Korean Won (approximately 5,192 RMB), was not typical for a private gathering, further supporting the classification of the event as work-related [2]

Group 1 - The article highlights a tragic case of a 34-year-old outsourced worker who suffered a sudden brain hemorrhage and passed away, raising concerns about workplace health and safety [1] - It emphasizes that the "Work Injury Insurance Regulations" classify sudden death from illness during work hours as a work-related injury, suggesting the company should assist the deceased's family in applying for recognition [1] - The article points out that cases of sudden death among technical workers are common, linking factors like overwork and late-night work to health risks such as brain hemorrhages [2] Group 2 - The article advises IT professionals to be cautious about their health, stressing that work is never-ending and that life is irreplaceable [2] - It suggests that companies should promote a healthier work-life balance to prevent such tragic incidents in the future [2]