Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of higher education institutions' technology innovation platforms as a crucial part of the national strategic technological force, highlighting their role in original innovation, key technology development, and high-level talent cultivation [1] Group 1: Development Paths for Innovation Platforms - The development of higher education technology innovation platforms requires a systematic approach that integrates five paths: research paradigm transformation, organizational methods, investment mechanisms, evaluation orientation, and open ecosystems [1] - The platforms should focus on transforming research paradigms to prioritize original supply and interdisciplinary collaboration, identifying scientific problems that can lead to paradigm shifts based on real-world needs [2] - A proactive approach to national strategic needs is essential, targeting critical technology areas and integrating foundational principles with key hardware and software technology routes [2] Group 2: Enhancing International Influence - The ability to propose scientific problems and establish standards is crucial for enhancing international discourse power, moving away from a model of merely following established Western research frameworks [3] - Higher education technology innovation platforms should actively participate in large scientific projects and lead standard-setting and open-source governance to increase their global influence [3] Group 3: Organizational Restructuring - A shift towards a "small core, large collaboration" organizational model is necessary to overcome structural bottlenecks and clarify roles within collaborative networks [4] - Establishing unified directories and open rules around major resources will facilitate data sharing and improve operational efficiency [4] Group 4: Institutional Support and Long-term Investment - A combination of mechanisms such as milestone assessments and flexible funding is needed to support high-risk original research, recognizing that foundational research often requires 7-10 years for significant breakthroughs [5] - Institutions should promote a culture of openness regarding negative results and data sharing to enhance research quality and support disruptive technologies [5] Group 5: Integration of Industry and Academia - The integration of industry and academia should focus on creating platforms for joint research and pilot testing, driven by significant real-world demands [6] - Mechanisms like "first-stage transformation" and "pre-incubation" should be promoted to address systemic barriers to technology transfer and commercialization [7] - The article outlines a closed-loop approach that connects strategic foresight, international participation, platform integration, institutional reform, and industry-academia collaboration to enhance the overall effectiveness of technology innovation platforms [7]