Workflow
广告法合规
icon
Search documents
贴香烟广告引争议!7-11一门店被立案调查
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-12-23 23:30
针对日前7-11便利店(7-Eleven)北京一门店贴出香烟广告,12月23日,北京市朝阳区市场监管局宣传 科回应南都·湾财社记者称,该局已关注此事,并对涉事门店立案调查,涉嫌违法的广告已被撤下,目 前案件正在调查中。 7-11便利店隶属于日本柒和伊控股公司(Seven&I Holdings),根据公司2025财年半年报,2025财年上 半年(2025.03.01-2025.08.31),公司营收同比下滑6.9%至56166.37亿日元,归母净利润则同比增长 133.1%至1218.02亿日元。 南都·湾财社记者注意到,有网友近日发帖投诉北京朝阳区一家7-11便利店贴出销售香烟的广告,此事 引发持续争议。图片中的广告牌显示,"人间烟火味,最抚凡人心。从即日起,开始售卖香烟。" 按地区来看,柒和伊控股在中国、澳大利亚等海外市场亏损收窄,而在北美市场利润增长。财报显示, 报告期内,除北美地区外的海外市场营收同比增长66%至3108.43亿日元,亏损5.52亿元,相比于上年同 期亏损20.68亿日元,表现亏损收窄。 针对此事,南都·湾财社记者曾于12月19日联系采访7-11相关负责人,截至发稿前未得到回应,企业官 ...
贵州金沙古酒酒业有限公司因发布违法广告被罚1760元
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-08-25 02:42
Group 1 - The administrative penalty decision was issued against Guizhou Jinsha Ancient Wine Industry Co., Ltd. for publishing illegal alcohol advertisements on its official WeChat account, resulting in a fine of 1,760 yuan [1][2] - The company published two advertisements that contained misleading medical claims, such as preventing cardiovascular diseases and alleviating anxiety, which violated advertising laws [1][2] - The company deleted the illegal advertisements after receiving complaints, and the fines were based on violations of the Advertising Law and Food Safety Law [2][8] Group 2 - Guizhou Jinsha Ancient Wine Industry Co., Ltd. was established on September 16, 2009, with a registered capital of 100 million yuan [3] - The company operates in the retail industry and is located in Jinsha County, Bijie City, Guizhou Province [3]
广州一店铺取名“警茶”,监管部门称招牌已拆除!律师分析
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-05-13 14:06
Core Viewpoint - The naming of a yet-to-open store as "Police Tea" in Guangzhou's Zengcheng District has raised concerns regarding its appropriateness and potential legal violations related to the use of police imagery and names [1][2]. Group 1: Store Naming and Regulatory Response - The store named "Police Tea" had a sign and cartoon police imagery that prompted scrutiny from local authorities [2]. - Following a report on May 12, the Zengcheng District Market Supervision Administration investigated and confirmed the existence of the "Police Tea" signage [2]. - The store owner agreed to rectify the situation, leading to the removal of the sign and imagery by May 13 [2][3]. Group 2: Legal Implications - Legal experts highlighted that the use of names or images associated with government agencies, such as the police, is prohibited under the Advertising Law and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law [2][3]. - If the store's name and decor create a misleading association with law enforcement, it could lead to regulatory action against the business [3].