Workflow
庇护城市
icon
Search documents
美媒:美移民执法行动将在南部两州逮捕5000人
Xin Hua She· 2025-12-01 09:43
新华社华盛顿11月30日电 据美联社11月30日报道,约250名美国移民执法人员预计将于1日开始在 路易斯安那州东南部及密西西比州开展一场为期数月的移民执法行动,目标是逮捕5000人。 报道说,美国边境巡逻队指挥官格雷戈里·博维诺将领导此次行动。此前,他曾指挥过在芝加哥、 洛杉矶和北卡罗来纳州夏洛特等地针对移民的执法行动,但因执法方式过于强硬,引发广泛争议,并招 致多项诉讼指控。 根据报道,近几个月,执法人员在芝加哥地区突袭行动中已逮捕超过3200名移民,但未提供太多细 节。此外,约600起近期逮捕案例的法庭文件显示,其中仅有极少数人具有构成"重大公共安全风险"的 犯罪记录。 报道说,此次行动代号为"沼泽清扫",将以路易斯安那州新奥尔良市为中心进行。这是特朗普政府 开始执行强硬的驱逐非法移民政策以来,最新一次针对民主党执政城市的联邦移民执法行动。 美国司法部此前指责新奥尔良市妨碍联邦移民执法工作,并将其列入18个所谓"庇护城市"名单之 中。然而,由共和党主导的路易斯安那州议会已通过多项法律,强制要求新奥尔良各机构配合特朗普政 府的强硬移民政策。 ...
美政府再次发起移民执法行动 民众如临“飓风”
Xin Hua She· 2025-12-01 09:16
新奥尔良及周边地区的移民律师称,近期接到当地居民大量关于如何应对"沼泽清扫"行动的咨询请 求。律师米格尔·伊莱亚斯说,许多咨询者因害怕被抓不敢现身,他和同事只能通过网络或电话提供咨 询服务。他形容移民社区当下反应如同应对"飓风来临":部分移民家庭囤积物资,一些家庭计划撤离; 不少家庭安排朋友接送孩子上学,以减少外出频率。执法行动开始前夕,有当地企业张贴了禁止联邦执 法人员进入的标识。 美国司法部指认新奥尔良市妨碍联邦移民执法,将其列入18个所谓"庇护城市"名单。该市监狱长期 受联邦法官监管,多数情况下不配合美国移民与海关执法局工作。当地警方主张移民执法事务属于民事 范畴、不在警方执法权限之内。 不过,由共和党主导的路易斯安那州议会已通过多项法律,强制新奥尔良的执法机构遵从特朗普政 府强硬移民政策。其中一项法律规定,"蓄意"采取旨在阻挠联邦移民执法工作的行为视为犯罪,违者可 能面临罚款和最高1年监禁。(高冰冰) 美国边境巡逻队官员格雷戈里·博维诺将负责指挥此次行动。他先前在芝加哥、洛杉矶等地指挥联 邦政府针对非法移民的大规模执法行动,引发多起纠纷。在芝加哥的行动中,联邦执法人员从直升机索 降至居民公寓楼,并向抗 ...
民主社会主义者马姆达尼发起“让纽约免受特朗普政策影响”运动!特朗普:准备将联邦资金作为对抗民主党人的工具
Ge Long Hui· 2025-11-06 09:18
Core Viewpoint - Zoran Mamdani's election as New York City Mayor represents a significant political shift, with his commitment to reducing living costs and opposing Donald Trump's policies being central to his platform [3][6][14]. Group 1: Election Results and Political Context - Mamdani won the election with over 50% of the votes, while his main opponent, Andrew Cuomo, received just over 40% [3]. - The Republican Party views Mamdani as a major opponent, framing his policies as representative of a shift towards radical socialism within the Democratic Party [3][4]. - House Speaker Mike Johnson stated that Mamdani's victory would have national implications, solidifying the Democratic Party's shift towards a more radical agenda [4]. Group 2: Challenges Ahead - Mamdani faces significant challenges in securing federal funding, as Trump has indicated a willingness to cut financial support to New York City [5][6]. - The incoming mayor's commitment to maintaining New York as a "sanctuary city" may lead to conflicts with the federal government over immigration enforcement [6][10]. - Mamdani's lack of extensive political experience raises concerns among Democratic leaders, who are wary of his rapid rise and potential policy proposals [10][12]. Group 3: Policy Commitments - Mamdani has pledged to implement policies such as freezing rent for regulated apartments, providing free public transportation, and establishing city-owned grocery stores [14]. - His campaign's focus on lowering living costs resonated strongly with voters, contributing to his electoral success [13][14]. - The mayor-elect's ability to secure funding for his initiatives may be challenged by his narrow victory margin, which could weaken his negotiating position [14].
美休斯敦大规模移民执法行动已致超1500人被捕
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-11-05 17:48
Core Points - The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrested over 1,500 individuals in Houston during a 10-day enforcement operation in October, ranking among the highest in similar nationwide actions [2] - The average daily arrest rate in Houston exceeded that of other cities, with Washington D.C. arresting 1,400 individuals over six weeks, Chicago arresting 3,800 over seven weeks, and Los Angeles arresting approximately 5,000 over twelve weeks [2] - The Trump administration has continued large-scale immigration enforcement targeting sanctuary cities, and despite Houston being governed by a Democratic mayor, Texas state law prohibits local governments from limiting police cooperation with ICE, thus not classifying it as a sanctuary city [2]
特朗普四度派兵引法律战,俄勒冈州诉其违宪
第一财经· 2025-09-29 08:42
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal and political implications of President Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard to Portland, Oregon, amidst ongoing protests related to immigration enforcement, highlighting the opposition from local officials and the public's growing concerns about political extremism and polarization [1][6][8]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Responses - Oregon's state government has officially filed a lawsuit against President Trump, claiming that the deployment of the National Guard constitutes an unconstitutional abuse of presidential power [1][6]. - The Oregon Attorney General plans to submit a request for a temporary restraining order against the military deployment within 24 hours [7]. - Local officials argue that the protests in Portland are small and peaceful, with no arrests related to the protests since June [6]. Group 2: Public Sentiment and Political Climate - A recent Ipsos poll indicates that over half of Americans oppose the deployment of the National Guard for local law enforcement [1]. - Concerns about political extremism and polarization have increased by approximately 15 percentage points since May [1]. - Oregon Governor Tina Kotek emphasized that there is no need for military intervention in Portland, stating that the situation does not pose a threat to public safety [6][8]. Group 3: Broader Context of National Guard Deployments - This marks the fourth time Trump has sent the National Guard to local states during his presidency, previously citing reasons such as high crime rates and social unrest [1]. - Trump's administration has been criticized for its approach to "sanctuary cities," with a directive to identify jurisdictions that hinder federal immigration enforcement [9][10]. - The deployment of the National Guard has been met with legal challenges in other states, including California, where a federal judge ruled that Trump's actions violated federal law [12].
特朗普四度派兵引法律战,俄勒冈州诉其违宪
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-09-29 06:55
Core Points - A majority of Americans oppose the deployment of the National Guard for local law enforcement, as indicated by a recent Ipsos poll [1] - Oregon officials have filed a lawsuit against President Trump, claiming his actions constitute an unconstitutional abuse of presidential power [1][3] - Trump has previously deployed the National Guard to various states, citing reasons such as high crime rates and immigration enforcement conflicts [1][5] Group 1: Public Opinion and Legal Actions - Over half of Americans are against the deployment of the National Guard for local law enforcement [1] - Oregon's Democratic Governor Tina Kotek stated that there is no need for military intervention in Portland, emphasizing the lack of significant unrest [3] - The Oregon Attorney General plans to file for a temporary injunction against the deployment of troops [4] Group 2: Trump's Actions and Responses - Trump has described Portland as a city in turmoil and has ordered military action in response to protests against immigration enforcement [3] - The Pentagon has begun mobilizing National Guard members in response to Trump's orders, raising concerns about the impact on state emergency responses [3][4] - Trump has previously signed an executive order targeting "sanctuary cities," indicating a broader strategy against local jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement [5][6] Group 3: Historical Context and Implications - Trump's administration has faced legal challenges regarding the deployment of the National Guard, with a federal judge ruling against such actions in California [5] - The expansion of the National Guard's role in domestic law enforcement has sparked protests and legal disputes, particularly in Democratic-led cities [6] - Trump's labeling of cities like Chicago and Los Angeles as "problem cities" suggests a continued focus on deploying the National Guard in response to crime and unrest [6]
美国司法部:司法部对加利福尼亚州洛杉矶的庇护城市政策提起诉讼。
news flash· 2025-06-30 17:27
Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against the sanctuary city policy in Los Angeles, California, which opposes the deportation of illegal immigrants and does not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement [1] Group 1: Sanctuary Cities - Sanctuary cities are defined as municipal jurisdictions that resist the deportation of illegal immigrants and are less likely to collaborate with the federal government in enforcing immigration laws [1]