中央纪委国家监委网站 沈东方 自江苏南京报道 1月7日，江苏省南京市纪委监委派驻市卫健委纪检监察组工作人员来到南京市中医院，走访了解新近集中采 购的医疗设备安装及履约情况。夏凡 摄 2025年12月19日上午9点半，江苏省南京市公共资源交易中心二楼开标室内，7名评标专家坐在配备监控摄像 头的电脑屏幕前。 "评标专家与供应商的法定代表人或者负责人有配偶、直系血亲、三代以内旁系血亲或者近姻亲关系的，或者 其他可能影响采购活动公正进行关系的，请选择'回避'按钮。"在市公共资源交易中心工作人员的主持 下，"2025年南京市医疗设备集中采购磁共振成像系统"评标会正式开始。这是南京市2025年组织的第四场大 型医疗设备集中采购评标会。 二十届中央纪委四次全会对医药、招标投标等权力集中、资金密集、资源富集领域系统整治提出明确要求。 南京市纪委监委以价值高、专业性强的大型医疗设备采购工作为切入口，结合查处案例剖析廉洁风险点，督 促市卫健委首次对全市大型医疗设备情况全面摸底，并推动其中5类设备实现集中采购，有效压缩权力寻租空 间。 梳理总结医疗设备采购风险点，集中采购精准破题 2025年3月，南京市委印发《关于落实全面从严治党 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the successful implementation of a special action in Nanjing to address legal-related petition issues, focusing on resolving conflicts and improving the judicial process through systematic measures and community engagement [1][2][4]. Group 1: Special Action Implementation - Nanjing's judicial system has initiated a concentrated effort to resolve legal-related petitions, with a focus on understanding and addressing the root causes of conflicts [2][3]. - The city has reviewed 9,487 legal-related petitions since 2022, identifying 741 unresolved cases for targeted resolution, with 571 of these classified as complex and assigned to leadership for resolution [2][3]. Group 2: Conflict Resolution Strategies - The courts have adopted a comprehensive approach to conflict resolution, employing various methods such as legal explanations, emotional resonance, and community mediation to address both legal and emotional grievances of petitioners [3][4]. - A total of 646 cases have been successfully resolved or concluded, representing 87.2% of the targeted petitions, including long-standing cases over 10 years old [4]. Group 3: Quality Control and Accountability - The judicial system has implemented a self-inspection and evaluation process to identify and rectify issues within the handling of petitions, ensuring fairness and transparency in judicial decisions [4][5]. - Measures have been established to enhance the quality of judicial proceedings, including a three-tiered mechanism for petition resolution, which emphasizes accountability and continuous improvement in judicial practices [5].