Core Points - The collaboration between the People's Court and the Audit Authority aims to enhance supervision and protect national and public interests [1][2] - A mechanism for daily communication and problem-solving has been established between the two entities [1] - A referral system for issues identified by either party has been implemented to ensure timely feedback and resolution [1] - The People's Court can appoint auditors as hearing officers to provide independent opinions on relevant cases [1] - Auditors can invite judges to participate in audits for legal guidance on issues encountered [1] Summary by Sections - **Collaboration Mechanism** - The People's Court and Audit Authority will establish a daily contact mechanism to analyze and address major issues collaboratively [1] - A referral mechanism will be in place for transferring relevant issues and feedback between the two entities [1] - **Operational Guidelines** - Both entities must operate within their legal powers and adhere to work discipline and confidentiality [2] - Emphasis on utilizing outcomes and summarizing advanced practices from the collaboration [2] - **Continuous Improvement** - Regular assessments of the collaboration's effectiveness and challenges will be conducted to enhance the mechanism [2] - The focus will be on innovating collaboration methods and improving coordination between judicial and audit functions [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the successful implementation of a special action in Nanjing to address legal-related petition issues, focusing on resolving conflicts and improving the judicial process through systematic measures and community engagement [1][2][4]. Group 1: Special Action Implementation - Nanjing's judicial system has initiated a concentrated effort to resolve legal-related petitions, with a focus on understanding and addressing the root causes of conflicts [2][3]. - The city has reviewed 9,487 legal-related petitions since 2022, identifying 741 unresolved cases for targeted resolution, with 571 of these classified as complex and assigned to leadership for resolution [2][3]. Group 2: Conflict Resolution Strategies - The courts have adopted a comprehensive approach to conflict resolution, employing various methods such as legal explanations, emotional resonance, and community mediation to address both legal and emotional grievances of petitioners [3][4]. - A total of 646 cases have been successfully resolved or concluded, representing 87.2% of the targeted petitions, including long-standing cases over 10 years old [4]. Group 3: Quality Control and Accountability - The judicial system has implemented a self-inspection and evaluation process to identify and rectify issues within the handling of petitions, ensuring fairness and transparency in judicial decisions [4][5]. - Measures have been established to enhance the quality of judicial proceedings, including a three-tiered mechanism for petition resolution, which emphasizes accountability and continuous improvement in judicial practices [5].

Core Insights - The feedback from the municipal inspection team highlighted that the courts in Suzhou are focusing on their primary responsibilities in judicial adjudication, providing strong judicial services and guarantees for the modernization practices in Suzhou [1] Group 1: Inspection Feedback - The inspection feedback sessions were held from November 3 to November 6, where the municipal inspection team communicated findings to the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court and nine county-level courts [1] - The feedback indicated that while the courts are performing well in their main judicial roles, there are still areas needing improvement, such as the quality and efficiency of adjudication and execution, team building, and internal management [1] Group 2: Responsibilities and Actions - The courts are urged to enhance their sense of responsibility and mission regarding the rectification of issues identified during the inspection, emphasizing the need for accountability and thorough resolution of the problems [1] - The inspection team received reports regarding some leadership issues, which have been forwarded to the disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities for further handling [1]

Group 1 - The core idea of the articles revolves around the establishment and effectiveness of specialized family courts in resolving domestic disputes and enhancing community governance in Liaoning Province, China [1][2][4] - The Dalinghe People's Court has successfully implemented a "3+2+4" family dispute resolution model, achieving a settlement rate of 85.7% for 1,029 family cases from January 2024 to September 2025 [2][3] - The Dalinghe Court has developed a "four-list" mechanism to address the complexities of family disputes, focusing on communication and support for vulnerable groups such as left-behind children and victims of domestic violence [3][4] Group 2 - The Damingtun People's Court has played a crucial role in supporting rural revitalization by resolving agricultural disputes, with 3,325 cases concluded and 1,370 conflicts mediated from January 2024 to September 2025 [8][9] - The court has established a three-dimensional dispute resolution network involving local government and community leaders, successfully creating 25 "no-litigation villages" [9][11] - The Damingtun Court has implemented proactive measures to educate local farmers on transaction risks and legal compliance, significantly reducing disputes in agricultural trade [10][11] Group 3 - The Tashan People's Court emphasizes the integration of the "Tashan Spirit" into its operations, focusing on providing judicial support for the local business environment [12][13] - The court has handled 156 enterprise-related cases in 2024, implementing a production and operation impact assessment mechanism to protect businesses during legal proceedings [13][14] - The Tashan Court has successfully mediated 63 financial disputes in 2024, involving a total amount of 626 million yuan, demonstrating its commitment to fostering a stable economic environment [15][16]

Core Insights - Guangzhou courts have adjudicated 27,800 foreign-related civil and commercial cases involving Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan over the past five years, ranking among the top in the country [1][2] Group 1: Judicial Achievements - The Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court has established a comprehensive judicial service ecosystem covering authorization witnessing, foreign law verification, cross-border trials, and arbitration mediation [1] - The court has innovated a blockchain platform called "Authorization Witnessing Pass," which has been applied in over 5,000 cases across 67 courts, benefiting parties from 38 countries and regions [1] Group 2: Legal Resources and Technology - The "Foreign Law Verification Pass" platform aggregates 443 foreign law verification cases, over 30,000 foreign legal regulations, and nearly 70,000 foreign-related judgments, linking to five foreign law verification institutions and eight foreign legal resource databases [1] - The platform employs an AI engine to provide intelligent comparative research services, successfully adjudicating over a hundred cases involving laws from countries such as Russia, the UK, Canada, South Africa, and Australia [1] Group 3: Online Services and Accessibility - Guangzhou courts have developed an all-business online processing system, offering over 40 services including filing and delivery, equipped with a multilingual intelligent guidance system [2] - The establishment of "E-Law Booths" in Hong Kong and Macau allows local parties to participate in court proceedings conveniently [2] Group 4: International Cooperation - Over the past five years, the courts have handled 446 cases involving mutual assistance in serving documents and gathering evidence from foreign and Hong Kong-Macau courts, and recognized and enforced 285 foreign and Hong Kong-Macau court judgments [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent selection exams for judges in Liaoning Province highlight the ongoing judicial reform efforts aimed at enhancing the quality and efficiency of the judicial system through a structured selection process for judges [1] Group 1: Selection Process - A total of 554 individuals participated in the quota judge selection exam, while 145 individuals took part in the progressive selection exam for judges [1] - Since the implementation of the quota system reform, the provincial court has organized nine batches of quota selections, resulting in the selection of 7,546 quota judges (including substitutes) [1] - The provincial court and relevant intermediate courts have conducted three batches of progressive selections, resulting in the selection of 119 judges from lower courts [1] Group 2: Reform Implementation - The quota and progressive selection processes are crucial components of the judicial system reform, facilitating the healthy flow of talent between upper and lower courts [1] - The provincial court has continuously improved the selection criteria, adjusting requirements related to educational background, legal work experience, and years of service in judicial support roles [1] - The inclusion of lawyer practice experience in the judicial support work experience and the implementation of a points system for experience in people's courts are part of the efforts to strengthen the selection process [1] Group 3: Talent Support - The policy allows for vacancies created by upper court selections to be filled by lower court selections, ensuring timely replenishment of vacant positions [1] - These measures are designed to provide robust talent support for the high-quality development of the provincial court system [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of high-quality and efficient handling of financial cases, which are often linked to significant property interests of the parties involved [1][3] - The Beijing Financial Court has developed a new securities investment loss accounting model to address information asymmetry in securities fraud disputes, resulting in a resolution for over 260 investors [1][3] - The court promotes a "court trial hundred questions" model to systematically analyze the details of securities fraud cases, leading to clearer legal relationships and more precise judgments [3][4] Group 2 - The increasing group characteristics of financial cases present challenges, as these cases often involve complex procedures and high costs for all parties if they attend court [4] - To address these challenges, a "dual-track dual-platform" mechanism has been implemented to allow representative plaintiffs to express their demands and participate in litigation, while also providing model judgments for typical cases [4] - The rapid development of digital technologies poses challenges for judicial processes, requiring judges to adapt to the complexities of cases involving big data and artificial intelligence [5][6]

Core Viewpoint - The provincial court has issued guidelines to enhance the quality of grassroots court construction, focusing on improving judicial efficiency and service to the public [1][2] Group 1: Key Initiatives - The new guidelines emphasize six key tasks: political construction, enhancement of trial quality, tackling weak courts, building people's courts, capacity building of personnel, and strengthening basic support [1] - A total of 25 specific measures have been introduced to deepen litigation execution reform, enhance multi-faceted dispute prevention and resolution, and strengthen the judicial service system [1] Group 2: Performance Metrics - The province's 110 grassroots courts handle 88% of the total case load, making their construction level critical to judicial quality and public perception of justice [2] - The "Strong Foundation Project" initiated in 2022 has led to significant improvements in grassroots courts, with two weak national courts and 17 provincial weak courts successfully upgraded [2] - The average trial period for first-instance civil and commercial cases has been reduced to 73.56 days, and the appeal rate for reviewed cases is 0.73 percentage points lower than the provincial average [2] - Grassroots court trial quality has shown continuous improvement for 14 consecutive quarters [2]

Group 1 - The implementation of the Central Eight Regulations has led to effective learning and education across various departments and units in the province, focusing on problem identification and concentrated rectification [2] - The Provincial Party Committee and the Provincial Direct Agency Work Committee have established a problem list based on 28 issues, actively soliciting opinions and suggestions from other units to improve compliance with the Central Eight Regulations [2] - A centralized rectification ledger has been created to address prominent issues identified, ensuring quality learning, effective problem identification, and practical improvements [2][3] Group 2 - The Provincial High People's Court is advancing rectification through project-based and checklist methods, focusing on key tasks to enhance judicial efficiency and address public concerns [3] - The court has identified specific actions such as clearing long-standing unresolved cases and standardizing enterprise-related law enforcement to improve the legal environment in Hainan Free Trade Port [3] - The National Development Bank Hainan Branch has identified 108 issues through practical engagement and has collected 36 public suggestions, establishing a rectification timeline and roadmap to address these issues effectively [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the integration of learning education on the Central Eight Regulations with the implementation of the Party's decisions, aiming to enhance the quality of governance and public trust in the judicial system [1][2][3] - The Autonomous Region's High People's Court is actively engaging in educational activities, including study sessions and problem identification, to ensure compliance with the Central Eight Regulations and improve judicial efficiency [1] - The Autonomous Region's People's Procuratorate is focusing on strengthening Party building and legal supervision quality through various educational initiatives, ensuring effective case handling and promoting a culture of diligence among its members [2] - The Autonomous Region's Justice Department is implementing a structured learning approach with specific tasks and regular evaluations to enhance the effectiveness of legal administration and improve the business environment [3] Group 2 - The emphasis on "two establishments" and "two safeguards" reflects a commitment to Party leadership and governance, guiding the educational focus for the year [2] - The integration of learning with practical work is highlighted, ensuring that educational efforts translate into improved legal practices and community trust [2][3] - The establishment of a feedback mechanism for business entities regarding legal enforcement indicates a proactive approach to fostering a law-based business environment [3]