Group 1 - The event held on February 14 at the Chabuchaer County People's Court gathered judges, retired officials, jurors, mediators, and community members to celebrate the New Year and discuss judicial commitment [1] - The atmosphere was festive, featuring performances such as a collective poetry recitation titled "Mission Responsibility," showcasing the dedication and spirit of the court staff [1] - Various performances, including a harmonica solo and a dance by young judges, highlighted the vitality and cohesion of the court team, culminating in a choir performance of "The Same Song" [1] Group 2 - The Chabuchaer County People's Court aims to uphold its commitment to the law and provide robust judicial support for the high-quality economic and social development of the county [2] - The court emphasizes a proactive approach with a focus on practical measures and a dedicated attitude to fulfill its constitutional responsibilities [2]

Group 1 - The Kunshan People's Court reported a total of 88,790 cases received and 73,796 cases concluded in 2025, achieving all standards set by the Supreme Court for trial quality management, placing it among the top in Suzhou [1] - The court's work on corporate restructuring was included in the Supreme Court's work report for the 2025 National People's Congress, highlighting its commitment to serving the economy and the public [1] - The court emphasized that every case impacts the business environment, with one case recognized as a typical example of supporting the high-quality development of the private economy, concluding 339 bankruptcy cases and saving 47 companies [1] Group 2 - The Kunshan court took strong measures against telecom and internet fraud, with one case recognized as an excellent example at the provincial level, contributing to the fight against money laundering [2] - The court facilitated the continuation of construction for four housing projects, leading to the delivery of 827 homes and resolving 2,678 cases of collective disputes in the real estate sector [2] - The court established a "Housing and Construction Mediation Station" in collaboration with housing departments and industry associations, resolving 801 construction-related disputes involving 1.36 billion yuan, with an average resolution time reduced by 45 days [2] Group 3 - The Kunshan court deepened market-oriented mediation, successfully mediating 15,060 disputes, a year-on-year increase of 77.22%, with three cases included in the Supreme Court's multi-faceted dispute resolution case library [2]

在省营商环境监测中，企业司法满意度居全省第一。其中，司法助企工作经验入选全国工商联"依法保 护民营企业和企业家合法权益协同实践案例"，深圳法院人工智能辅助审判系统入选全国政务领域人工 智能应用优秀案例。 报告提到，2025年，深圳市中级人民法院审结电信网络诈骗犯罪案件618件，"缅北系列电诈案"中，白 所成等5名跨境电诈犯罪分子被依法判处死刑，该案入选"新时代推动法治进程2025年度十大案件"。 2026年，深圳市中级人民法院将继续服务保障高水平安全、服务保障高质量发展、不断提升公正司法水 平、全面加强过硬队伍建设。 2月10日，深圳市第七届人民代表大会第七次会议听取深圳市中级人民法院工作报告。报告提到，2025 年全市法院新收案件855738件，办结773828件，法官人均结案744件，同比增加249件，高出全省平均水 平261件，位列全省第一。 2025年，深圳市中级人民法院反映审判质量和效果的主要指标上诉率、一审案件改判发回重审率均为近 十年最优，其中，上诉率同比下降35.1%，一审案件改判发回重审率同比下降33.3%。 ...

2026年2月4日，广州国际商事法庭正式成立。作为服务保障高水平对外开放和粤港澳大湾区建设的重要 国际商事争议解决平台，广州国际商事法庭的成立标志着广州在打造国际商事纠纷解决高地、营造国际 一流法治化营商环境的征程上迈出了关键一步。 最高人民法院批复同意设立 广州国际商事法庭 2025年9月，最高人民法院出台《关于推进国际商事法庭高质量发展 服务保障高水平对外开放的意 见》，系统谋划国际商事法庭高质量发展的路径、举措。 广州作为我国重要的中心城市、粤港澳大湾区核心引擎，正全力以赴推进深层次改革，扩大高水平开 放，设立广州国际商事法庭，恰逢其势、正当其时。 2月4日上午，广州市中级人民法院召开新闻发布会，详细介绍了广州国际商事法庭的成立背景、主要职 能与管辖范围。广州市中级人民法院党组副书记、副院长吴翔，广州国际商事法庭主要负责同志张筱 锴，负责同志宁建文参加发布会。发布会由广州市中级人民法院宣教处处长陈育锦主持。 会议介绍，广州国际商事法庭是经最高人民法院批复同意，内设于广州市中级人民法院的国际商事专业 审判机构，专门管辖涉外商事案件。管辖范围涵盖应由广州市中级人民法院管辖的第一、二审涉外商事 案件、仲裁司法 ...

一图读懂省"两院"工作报告 为高标准建设自贸港贡献司法智慧和力量 2026 工作安排 强化政治建设 以更高站位铸牢绝对忠诚 强化使命担当 以更大力度服务中心大局 强化宗旨意识 以更实举措保障民生福祉 强化改革创新 以更高质效实现公平正义 强化队伍建设 以更严要求锻造法院铁军 海南省高级人民法院 2025年工作回顾 全年受理案件41.65万件，审结37.72万件 法官人均办案360件 最高法院确定的16项审判质量管理指标全部达标 其中9项优于全国平均值 全省法院25个集体、42名个人获省级以上表彰表扬 1 全面贯彻总体国家安全观 以严格公正司法守牢自贸港安全底线 审结刑事案件10273件 判处罪犯11920人 促推全国最安全地区创建 健全立审执一体协同工作机制，推动30件涉军土地案件得到实质化解，依法支持收回军用土地 2659.16亩 修订"套代购"走私刑事案件裁判指引 审结相关案件116件184人 出台服务保障农垦改革发展15条措施，成功调解土地纠纷877件，涉及土地面积1.62万亩，助推垦 区未规范管理土地整治 2 全面发挥审判职能 以严格公正司法服务经济社会高质量发展 提升办理破产便利度，审结破产和强制清 ...

Group 1 - The core objective of the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court is to ensure that the public feels fairness and justice in every judicial case by 2025, with significant achievements in various aspects of work [1] - In 2025, the total number of cases accepted by the courts in Suzhou reached 515,760, with 421,385 cases concluded, and the average number of cases concluded per judge was 487 [1] - The court implemented quality management throughout the case process, achieving full compliance with judicial quality indicators, and organized 102 concentrated execution activities [1] Group 2 - The court focused on high-quality judicial services to support high-quality development, particularly in protecting innovations in key sectors such as integrated circuits and advanced materials [2] - The establishment of seven corporate restructuring service centers helped 109 companies recover, creating opportunities for 41 "honest but unfortunate" debtors [2] - The court enhanced public welfare by expediting labor dispute cases and supporting ecological restoration projects, while also promoting market-oriented mediation to resolve 55,000 disputes [2]

Core Viewpoint - Shanghai's digital court system is effectively addressing traditional judicial challenges, such as identifying fraudulent divorce cases used for debt evasion, through advanced data integration and predictive alerts [1][3]. Group 1: Digital Court Innovations - The Shanghai digital court has integrated data deeply into judicial practices, significantly improving the identification of issues like false litigation [1][3]. - Since the implementation of the 14th Five-Year Plan, the digital court has developed over 1,800 application scenarios and embedded more than 800 into case handling systems, generating over 1.5 million alerts that cover 92% of judges in the city [5]. Group 2: Case Study of Fraudulent Divorce - A divorce case in the Pudong New Area revealed potential debt evasion, where the husband had numerous ongoing litigation cases, prompting the court to investigate further [2][3]. - The court's alert system indicated that the husband might be attempting to transfer assets to the wife, which could hinder debt repayment, leading to a decision to separate the divorce proceedings from asset distribution [2][3]. Group 3: Data-Driven Dispute Resolution - The digital court utilizes big data to identify common disputes, such as noise and smoke complaints, and has initiated community巡回审判 (circuit trials) to address these issues directly [6][7]. - In a notable case involving neighbor disputes over property use, the court facilitated a resolution that led to the removal of a problematic structure, resulting in the resolution of 21 related disputes [7]. Group 4: Community Safety Initiatives - A fire incident caused by improper electric vehicle charging highlighted safety concerns, leading to a court ruling that mandated compensation and the establishment of community guidelines for electric vehicle management [8]. - The Shanghai courts have set up 340巡回审判 points across 200 neighborhoods, resolving over 4,880 disputes through community engagement and legal education [8].

Core Points - The collaboration between the People's Court and the Audit Authority aims to enhance supervision and protect national and public interests [1][2] - A mechanism for daily communication and problem-solving has been established between the two entities [1] - A referral system for issues identified by either party has been implemented to ensure timely feedback and resolution [1] - The People's Court can appoint auditors as hearing officers to provide independent opinions on relevant cases [1] - Auditors can invite judges to participate in audits for legal guidance on issues encountered [1] Summary by Sections - **Collaboration Mechanism** - The People's Court and Audit Authority will establish a daily contact mechanism to analyze and address major issues collaboratively [1] - A referral mechanism will be in place for transferring relevant issues and feedback between the two entities [1] - **Operational Guidelines** - Both entities must operate within their legal powers and adhere to work discipline and confidentiality [2] - Emphasis on utilizing outcomes and summarizing advanced practices from the collaboration [2] - **Continuous Improvement** - Regular assessments of the collaboration's effectiveness and challenges will be conducted to enhance the mechanism [2] - The focus will be on innovating collaboration methods and improving coordination between judicial and audit functions [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the successful implementation of a special action in Nanjing to address legal-related petition issues, focusing on resolving conflicts and improving the judicial process through systematic measures and community engagement [1][2][4]. Group 1: Special Action Implementation - Nanjing's judicial system has initiated a concentrated effort to resolve legal-related petitions, with a focus on understanding and addressing the root causes of conflicts [2][3]. - The city has reviewed 9,487 legal-related petitions since 2022, identifying 741 unresolved cases for targeted resolution, with 571 of these classified as complex and assigned to leadership for resolution [2][3]. Group 2: Conflict Resolution Strategies - The courts have adopted a comprehensive approach to conflict resolution, employing various methods such as legal explanations, emotional resonance, and community mediation to address both legal and emotional grievances of petitioners [3][4]. - A total of 646 cases have been successfully resolved or concluded, representing 87.2% of the targeted petitions, including long-standing cases over 10 years old [4]. Group 3: Quality Control and Accountability - The judicial system has implemented a self-inspection and evaluation process to identify and rectify issues within the handling of petitions, ensuring fairness and transparency in judicial decisions [4][5]. - Measures have been established to enhance the quality of judicial proceedings, including a three-tiered mechanism for petition resolution, which emphasizes accountability and continuous improvement in judicial practices [5].

Core Insights - The feedback from the municipal inspection team highlighted that the courts in Suzhou are focusing on their primary responsibilities in judicial adjudication, providing strong judicial services and guarantees for the modernization practices in Suzhou [1] Group 1: Inspection Feedback - The inspection feedback sessions were held from November 3 to November 6, where the municipal inspection team communicated findings to the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court and nine county-level courts [1] - The feedback indicated that while the courts are performing well in their main judicial roles, there are still areas needing improvement, such as the quality and efficiency of adjudication and execution, team building, and internal management [1] Group 2: Responsibilities and Actions - The courts are urged to enhance their sense of responsibility and mission regarding the rectification of issues identified during the inspection, emphasizing the need for accountability and thorough resolution of the problems [1] - The inspection team received reports regarding some leadership issues, which have been forwarded to the disciplinary inspection and supervision authorities for further handling [1]