Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of maintaining a sense of reverence and continuous ideological refinement to combat corruption and misconduct [1] - Warning education serves as a crucial tool for self-correction among party members and officials, helping them to align their behavior with ethical standards [1] - The need for in-depth analysis of typical cases is highlighted, focusing on serious and impactful examples while also considering local and systemic issues [1] Group 2 - There is a call for precise differentiation of educational targets to address the current homogenization of warning education content, ensuring it meets specific needs [2] - The design of educational content should be tailored to different fields, levels, and positions, particularly focusing on key individuals and young officials [2] - Innovative methods and interactive experiences are recommended to enhance the effectiveness of warning education, moving beyond traditional formats to engage participants more deeply [2]