Group 1 - The core issue identified is that many departments and units are conducting opinion solicitation activities that are superficial and do not genuinely seek input, leading to a lack of meaningful engagement with the public [1] - Various problematic practices in opinion solicitation were highlighted, including filtering responses, ignoring feedback, and rushing the process, which undermine the purpose of gathering public input [1] - The article emphasizes that the superficial approach to opinion solicitation damages public trust and the credibility of grassroots governance, attributing this issue to bureaucratic and formalistic tendencies within certain departments [1] Group 2 - To address the issue of insincere opinion solicitation, it is essential to focus on genuine engagement by strengthening institutional rigor and making public satisfaction a key standard [2] - The article suggests that the collection, adoption, and implementation of opinions should be included in government transparency efforts to enhance public participation and accountability [2] - Increased oversight and strict penalties for departments treating opinion solicitation as a mere formality are recommended to improve the quality and efficiency of the process [2]

Group 1 - The core issue identified is that many departments are conducting opinion solicitation activities that are superficial and do not genuinely seek public input, leading to a lack of effective decision-making [1][2] - Various methods of insincere solicitation are highlighted, including filtering opinions from only selected individuals, ignoring submitted feedback, and rushing the process without proper consideration [1] - This superficial approach undermines public trust and the credibility of grassroots governance, primarily driven by bureaucratic and formalistic tendencies within certain departments [1] Group 2 - To address the issue of insincere opinion solicitation, it is essential to focus on genuine engagement by strengthening institutional rigidity and making public satisfaction a key standard [2] - The collection, adoption, and implementation of opinions should be included in government transparency efforts to enhance public participation and compel solicitors to improve their work quality [2] - Increased oversight and strict penalties for departments treating opinion solicitation as a mere formality are necessary to ensure accountability and effectiveness in governance [2]

Group 1 - The core issue highlighted is the ineffective implementation of public opinion solicitation, where many departments engage in superficial practices rather than genuinely seeking feedback [1][2] - Various problematic practices were identified, such as filtering opinions from a closed circle, ignoring submitted feedback, and rushing the process, which undermines the purpose of soliciting public input [1] - The article emphasizes that the superficial approach to opinion solicitation not only fails to aid scientific decision-making but also erodes public trust and credibility in grassroots governance [1] Group 2 - To address the issue of ineffective opinion solicitation, it is essential to focus on genuine engagement and strengthen institutional rigidity, making public satisfaction a key standard [2] - The article suggests that the collection, adoption, and implementation of opinions should be included in government transparency efforts to enhance public participation and accountability [2] - Increased oversight and strict penalties for departments treating opinion solicitation as a mere formality are recommended to improve the quality and efficiency of the process [2]