Workflow
成本转移
icon
Search documents
为什么你的手机,配件越来越少了?
36氪· 2025-10-10 09:29
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the trend of reducing accessories in smartphone packaging, particularly focusing on the environmental narrative used by companies like Apple to justify these changes while also benefiting financially from cost savings and new market opportunities [8][10][61]. Group 1: Environmental Justification - The removal of accessories like chargers and earphones began with Apple's iPhone 12 series, which was framed as an environmental initiative to reduce electronic waste and carbon emissions [11][12][20]. - Apple claimed that eliminating chargers and EarPods could reduce carbon emissions by over 2 million tons annually, equivalent to removing 500,000 cars from the road [15][16]. - The environmental narrative has been effectively utilized by companies to enhance their brand image while simultaneously reducing costs [25][21]. Group 2: Financial Implications - By reducing the size of packaging, companies can increase shipping efficiency, allowing for more units per transport pallet, which significantly lowers logistics costs [22]. - The trend has led to a broader industry movement where other manufacturers follow suit, capitalizing on the dual benefits of cost savings and environmental branding [26][27]. - The removal of standard accessories has created new consumer demands, such as the rise of AirPods, which generated $39.8 billion in revenue, surpassing major brands like Nike and Coca-Cola [36][37]. Group 3: Consumer Experience - The reduction of essential accessories has negatively impacted user experience, as many consumers find themselves without necessary chargers or accessories upon purchasing new devices [46][49]. - The article highlights a shift from a consumer-friendly approach, where all necessary accessories were included, to a model where consumers must purchase additional items separately, leading to increased costs and inconvenience [53][61]. - The trend raises concerns about the sustainability of this model, as it appears to prioritize corporate profits over genuine environmental benefits and consumer satisfaction [60][62].