Core Viewpoint - The recent release of the opinion by 12 departments, including the Supreme People's Court and the National Development and Reform Commission, aims to enhance the collaborative enforcement and judicial work to protect the ecological environment and promote high-quality development in the Yangtze River Basin [1][2]. Group 1: Collaborative Enforcement and Judicial Work - The opinion emphasizes the need for improved communication and consultation among departments, focusing on key areas such as pollution prevention, fishing bans, riverbed sand mining management, and the protection of endangered species [1]. - It calls for unified enforcement and judicial standards to ensure consistent rulings in similar cases, thereby enhancing the standardization of enforcement and judicial practices [1]. Group 2: Ecological Restoration - The opinion mandates inter-departmental collaboration for ecological restoration, ensuring effective maintenance and evaluation of restoration efforts [2]. - It highlights the importance of cross-regional cooperation in implementing restoration plans and emphasizes the need for legal supervision and effect assessment of restoration work [2]. - The document also outlines beneficial experiences regarding the transfer of ecological restoration funds and the execution of restoration by local judicial authorities in affected areas [2].

Core Viewpoint - The recent release of the "Opinions on Strengthening Law Enforcement and Judicial Work Coordination to Support Ecological Environment Protection and High-Quality Development in the Yangtze River Basin" aims to enhance the effectiveness of ecological protection through improved collaboration among various governmental departments [1][2]. Group 1: Law Enforcement and Judicial Coordination - The Opinions emphasize the need for enhanced communication and consultation among departments, focusing on key areas such as pollution prevention, fishing bans, riverbed sand mining management, and the protection of endangered species [1]. - It calls for unified standards in law enforcement and judicial practices to ensure consistent rulings in similar cases, thereby improving the standardization of law enforcement and judicial processes [1]. Group 2: Ecological Restoration - The Opinions require inter-departmental collaboration for ecological restoration, ensuring effective maintenance and evaluation of restoration efforts [2]. - It highlights the importance of cross-regional cooperation in implementing restoration plans and mandates the supervision and assessment of these efforts to ensure the damaged ecological environment is effectively restored [2]. - The document also outlines the process for transferring ecological restoration funds across administrative boundaries to facilitate the execution of restoration projects in affected areas [2].

在生态修复协作方面，意见提出加强生态环境修复跨部门协作，科学确定、合理实施修复方案，依法开 展修复工作的监督落实、效果评估，共同维护修复效果。 （文章来源：经济日报） 意见规定了强化执法司法工作协同的具体举措，包括统一执法司法标准和尺度，支持行政执法机关依法 开展联合行动；完善评估鉴定标准规范，共享专家库，着力解决实践中鉴定难、鉴定贵问题；推进跨部 门大数据协同办案和情况通报，共享长江流域生态环境执法司法信息数据；等等。 同时，意见进一步强化法律责任统筹，明确刑事、民事、行政法律责任的全面依法协调适用，违法行为 人积极履行生态环境修复、赔偿责任的，依法作为从宽处理的情节。 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、国家发展改革委等12部门14日联合发布《关于加强执法司法工作协同 服务保障长江流域生态环境保护和高质量发展的意见》，吸收各地实践探索有益经验，提升长江系统性 保护成效。 意见共18条，分为总体要求和强化联动、优化衔接、深化合作4部分。其中明确要坚持依法推进、务实 高效，用最严格制度最严密法治保护长江流域生态环境，准确适用刑法、民法典、长江保护法等法律法 规，形成齐抓共管的强大法治合力。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The document outlines a collaborative approach among various governmental departments to enhance law enforcement and judicial work in protecting the ecological environment of the Yangtze River Basin and promoting high-quality development [1][2] Group 1: Law Enforcement and Judicial Collaboration - The opinion emphasizes the need for improved communication and coordination among departments, focusing on key areas such as pollution prevention, a ten-year fishing ban, and riverbed sand mining management [1] - It aims to unify law enforcement and judicial standards to enhance the overall level of regulatory compliance [1] - The document supports joint actions by administrative law enforcement agencies in regions with high ecological sensitivity and frequent environmental violations [1] Group 2: Ecological Restoration - The opinion calls for enhanced inter-departmental collaboration on ecological restoration, including the scientific determination and reasonable implementation of restoration plans [1] - It emphasizes the importance of legal supervision and effectiveness evaluation in the implementation of restoration efforts [1] - The establishment of ecological protection and restoration bases is proposed to integrate various functions such as ecological restoration, legal education, and comprehensive governance [1]