《意见》明确，坚持依法办案与促推治理并重，支持行政执法机关在长江流域跨行政区域、生态敏感区 域和生态环境违法案件高发区域开展联合行动，完善联合监管、联合执法、执法协助制度机制。 本报北京8月25日电 （记者魏哲哲）最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、国家发展改革委等12部门近期对 外发布《关于加强执法司法工作协同 服务保障长江流域生态环境保护和高质量发展的意见》，吸收各 地实践探索有益经验，着力解决和规范执法司法工作协同中的突出困难和问题，提升长江系统性保护成 效。 《意见》要求，加强沟通会商。聚焦污染防治攻坚、长江十年禁渔、河道采砂管理、尾矿库治理、重要 江河湖库治理保护、珍贵濒危野生动植物保护、长江文物和非物质文化遗产保护等重点领域和多发高发 案件，加强形势会商，凝聚法治共识，统一执法司法标准尺度，推动实现类案同判，全面提升执法司法 规范化水平。 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年08月26日 14 版） (责编：杨光宇、胡永秋) 在生态修复方面，《意见》要求各部门协作实施修复，共同维护修复效果，强化异地修复合作等。《意 见》要求加强跨部门协作，科学确定、合理实施修复方案，依法开展修复工作的监督落实、效果评估， 促 ...

在生态修复方面，《意见》要求各部门协作实施修复，共同维护修复效果，强化异地修复合作等。《意 见》要求加强跨部门协作，科学确定、合理实施修复方案，依法开展修复工作的监督落实、效果评估， 促使受损生态环境得到有效修复。同时，《意见》总结长江流域法院跨域移交生态环境修复资金、委托 异地法院执行实施修复等有益经验，明确对于在受损地组织实施生态环境修复更为适宜的跨行政区划案 件，依照相关规定将执行到位的修复费用跨行政区划移交受损地用于生态环境修复，由受损地执法司法 机关实施或者协助实施。另外，对于涉渔业等无法修复或者无法完全修复的，可以由受损地相关部门、 机构组织开展替代修复。 （文章来源：人民日报） 本报北京8月25日电 （记者魏哲哲）最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、国家发展改革委等12部门近期对 外发布《关于加强执法司法工作协同服务保障长江流域生态环境保护和高质量发展的意见》，吸收各地 实践探索有益经验，着力解决和规范执法司法工作协同中的突出困难和问题，提升长江系统性保护成 效。 《意见》要求，加强沟通会商。聚焦污染防治攻坚、长江十年禁渔、河道采砂管理、尾矿库治理、重要 江河湖库治理保护、珍贵濒危野生动植物保护、长江 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the strengthening of law enforcement and judicial coordination across the Yangtze River basin to support ecological protection and high-quality development, emphasizing a system-wide governance approach and the importance of ecological prioritization and green development [3][9]. Summary by Sections Legal Framework and Achievements - The "Yangtze River Protection Law" has been in effect since March 1, 2021, leading to significant achievements in ecological protection through enhanced law enforcement, ecological restoration, and public participation, with 457,400 environmental resource cases adjudicated by courts in the basin [3][4]. Case Studies - A notable case involved the Shanghai court's handling of a bankruptcy restructuring for a port company, which integrated environmental governance into the restructuring process, attracting over 87 million yuan in investments while ensuring ecological commitments [4]. - In a case concerning virtual currency mining machines, a court ruled the sales contract invalid due to excessive energy consumption and carbon emissions, promoting lower carbon production practices [5]. Challenges in Environmental Protection - The article highlights ongoing challenges in environmental law enforcement, including lengthy and costly environmental damage assessments, lack of unified standards, and the complexity of information sharing among various departments [6][9]. - Discrepancies in judicial outcomes for similar environmental offenses were noted, with significant variations in penalties and ecological compensation responsibilities across different cases [7]. Recommendations for Improvement - The article outlines recommendations from the recent opinion issued by 12 government departments, focusing on unified standards for law enforcement, enhanced collaboration across administrative regions, and improved ecological assessment practices [9][10]. - It emphasizes the need for a coordinated approach to environmental governance, including the establishment of a shared database for ecological law enforcement and judicial information to avoid data silos [9][10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and advancements in the ecological environment protection and judicial practices in the Yangtze River Basin, emphasizing the need for coordinated efforts among various departments to enhance ecological governance and support high-quality development [1][6]. Group 1: Legislative and Judicial Developments - The "Yangtze River Protection Law" has been in effect since March 1, 2021, leading to significant achievements in ecological protection through enhanced law enforcement, ecological restoration, and public participation [1]. - A total of 457,400 environmental resource cases have been adjudicated by courts across 19 provinces and municipalities in the Yangtze River Basin, showcasing the judicial system's role in environmental protection [1]. Group 2: Collaborative Efforts and Case Studies - The Supreme People's Court's Environmental Resource Tribunal has highlighted successful case studies, such as the bankruptcy restructuring of a company in the Yangtze River Delta, which integrated environmental protection commitments into its recovery plan, attracting over 87 million yuan in investments [2]. - Courts in Hunan and Jiangsu have taken significant actions against environmentally harmful practices, such as declaring contracts for energy-intensive virtual currency mining equipment invalid, thereby promoting lower carbon production methods [2]. Group 3: Challenges in Environmental Judicial Practices - The article identifies key challenges in environmental judicial practices, including lengthy and costly environmental damage assessments, which hinder timely case resolutions [3]. - There is a lack of uniformity in judicial standards, as evidenced by discrepancies in sentencing for similar environmental offenses, indicating a need for standardized judicial practices [3]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - The "Opinions" document proposes enhancing cross-regional coordination in environmental resource crime cases, emphasizing systematic governance and professional adjudication [6][7]. - It suggests improving the construction of ecological assessment and evaluation institutions, sharing expert resources, and promoting data collaboration among departments to address existing challenges in environmental governance [6][7].

在生态修复协作方面，意见提出加强生态环境修复跨部门协作，科学确定、合理实施修复方案，依法开 展修复工作的监督落实、效果评估，共同维护修复效果。 （文章来源：经济日报） 意见规定了强化执法司法工作协同的具体举措，包括统一执法司法标准和尺度，支持行政执法机关依法 开展联合行动；完善评估鉴定标准规范，共享专家库，着力解决实践中鉴定难、鉴定贵问题；推进跨部 门大数据协同办案和情况通报，共享长江流域生态环境执法司法信息数据；等等。 同时，意见进一步强化法律责任统筹，明确刑事、民事、行政法律责任的全面依法协调适用，违法行为 人积极履行生态环境修复、赔偿责任的，依法作为从宽处理的情节。 最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、国家发展改革委等12部门14日联合发布《关于加强执法司法工作协同 服务保障长江流域生态环境保护和高质量发展的意见》，吸收各地实践探索有益经验，提升长江系统性 保护成效。 意见共18条，分为总体要求和强化联动、优化衔接、深化合作4部分。其中明确要坚持依法推进、务实 高效，用最严格制度最严密法治保护长江流域生态环境，准确适用刑法、民法典、长江保护法等法律法 规，形成齐抓共管的强大法治合力。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court and 12 other central and national agencies jointly issued an opinion to enhance law enforcement and judicial collaboration for the ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yangtze River Basin [1][2]. Group 1: Overall Requirements - The opinion emphasizes ecological priority and green development, aiming to support major regional strategies like the Yangtze River Economic Belt and Yangtze River Delta integration [2]. - It calls for coordinated and systematic governance, establishing an integrated protection mechanism for the ecosystem [2]. - The opinion stresses the importance of strict legal frameworks to protect the ecological environment of the Yangtze River Basin [2]. Group 2: Strengthening Collaboration - The opinion outlines measures to enhance law enforcement and judicial collaboration, focusing on pollution prevention and other key areas [3]. - It supports joint actions in cross-regional and ecologically sensitive areas to address environmental violations [3]. - The opinion highlights the need for improved technical support and shared expert resources to address environmental assessment challenges [3]. Group 3: Optimizing Coordination - The opinion specifies the need for better coordination between administrative law enforcement and criminal justice regarding environmental cases [4]. - It emphasizes the importance of evidence collection and cooperation among relevant agencies in environmental resource cases [4]. - The opinion calls for a comprehensive approach to legal responsibilities, ensuring that violators fulfill ecological restoration and compensation duties [4]. Group 4: Deepening Cooperation - The opinion promotes regular communication mechanisms to enhance policy consistency and execution [5]. - It encourages joint research and training to improve the capabilities of law enforcement and judicial personnel [5]. - The opinion advocates for the establishment of ecological protection and restoration bases to enhance governance effectiveness [5]. Next Steps - The People's Court will implement the requirements of the opinion to protect the ecological environment and promote high-quality development in the Yangtze River Basin [6].

在生态修复方面，意见提出加强生态环境修复跨部门协作，科学确定、合理实施修复方案，依法开 展修复工作的监督落实、效果评估，共同维护修复效果；联合设立生态环境保护修复（法治宣传）基 地，融合发挥生态修复、巡回审判、法治宣传、实践教育、文化和旅游、综合治理等作用，提高保护修 复治理综合效能。 意见明确，加强沟通会商，聚焦污染防治攻坚、长江十年禁渔、河道采砂管理等重点领域和多发高 发案件，统一执法司法标准和尺度，全面提升执法司法规范化水平；坚持依法办案与促推治理并重，支 持行政执法机关在长江流域跨行政区域、生态敏感区域和生态环境违法案件高发区域依法开展联合行 动。 新华社北京8月14日电（记者冯家顺）在第三个全国生态日到来之际，最高人民法院、最高人民检 察院、国家发展改革委等12部门14日对外发布《关于加强执法司法工作协同 服务保障长江流域生态环 境保护和高质量发展的意见》，吸收各地实践探索有益经验，着力解决和规范执法司法工作协同中的突 出困难和问题，提升长江系统性保护成效。 当天，最高法还发布了长江流域执法司法工作协同典型案例，指导长江流域法院更好履职尽责，为 长江流域生态环境保护和高质量发展提供更加有力的司法服务 ...

Core Points - The meeting in Chongqing focused on the implementation of the Yangtze River Protection Law and its effectiveness in ecological environment protection and high-quality development [1] - Over the past four years, courts in 19 provinces and municipalities along the Yangtze River have adjudicated 457,400 environmental resource cases, including 85,900 criminal cases, 229,200 civil cases, and 142,300 administrative cases [1] - The Supreme People's Court has issued 22 judicial interpretations related to environmental pollution crimes and ecological infringement, and has published 45 guiding cases on ecological environment protection [1] Group 1 - The courts have actively extended judicial protection of the environment from the trial phase to post-judgment environmental restoration [2] - A total of 717 comprehensive ecological environment judicial protection (restoration) bases have been established in key areas such as the Sanjiangyuan and rare fish protection zones [2] - The courts utilize preventive environmental public interest litigation, injunctions, and preliminary execution to prevent ecological damage [2]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting held in Chongqing emphasizes the judicial efforts in protecting the ecological environment of the Yangtze River and promoting high-quality development, marking the fourth anniversary of the implementation of the Yangtze River Protection Law [1] Group 1: Judicial Function and Achievements - From March 1, 2021, to February 28, 2023, courts in 19 provinces along the Yangtze River adjudicated 457,400 environmental resource cases, showcasing the commitment to legal protection of the ecological environment [2] - The Chongqing court has concluded 7,842 environmental resource cases and approved the enforcement of administrative fines totaling 177 million yuan, demonstrating effective judicial action [2] - Landmark cases such as the "Yunnan Green Peacock case" and the "Guizhou Ancient Tree case" highlight the progress in legal governance along the Yangtze River [2] Group 2: Ecological Restoration Efforts - The courts are extending their judicial protection efforts beyond trial phases to include post-judgment environmental restoration, ensuring timely recovery of damaged ecosystems [4] - Various courts are enhancing judicial protection for critical ecological areas, such as the source of the Yangtze River and the Three Gorges Reservoir, to strengthen ecological barriers [4] - Jiangsu courts have established 77 judicial restoration bases for ecological damage, implementing innovative compensation methods that allow companies to offset fines through environmental technology investments [4] Group 3: Collaborative Judicial Mechanisms - Courts across the Yangtze River basin are collaborating effectively, signing 486 cooperation agreements with various law enforcement agencies to enhance ecological governance [7] - The integration of judicial processes with environmental law enforcement aims to create a multi-faceted governance structure for the protection of the Yangtze River [7] - The Supreme People's Court emphasizes the importance of high-quality judicial services in ensuring the ecological safety and pollution prevention in the Yangtze River basin [7]