抗战红色资源保护

Search documents
最高检发布“铭记抗战历史 传承抗战精神”检察公益诉讼典型案例
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-09-01 02:38
Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released typical cases of public interest litigation focusing on the protection of historical sites related to the Anti-Japanese War, emphasizing the importance of preserving red cultural resources and promoting the spirit of resistance [1][3]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1: The Shaanxi Province Suide County People's Procuratorate urged the protection of the Red Army's Eastern Expedition Command Post, highlighting the severe deterioration of the site and the lack of management [2][4][6]. - Case 2: The Jiangsu Province Baoying County People's Procuratorate focused on the protection of New Fourth Army cultural relics, addressing issues of damage to immovable and movable red resources [10][12][14]. - Case 3: The Shandong Province Ju'nan County People's Procuratorate emphasized the need for the protection of the Jiazi Mountain Field Hospital site, which faced risks due to inadequate management [17][19][21]. - Case 4: The Shanxi Province Shenchi County People's Procuratorate addressed the protection of the 120th Division Command Post, where private ownership led to significant deterioration [25][26][28]. - Case 5: The Henan Province Luoyang City Luolong District People's Procuratorate focused on the Wang Shanzhai Anti-Japanese site, which suffered from neglect and damage [31][32][33]. - Case 6: The Hebei Province Shenzhou City People's Procuratorate worked on the protection of the memorial facilities for 85 martyrs, emphasizing the need for proper management and preservation [37][38][39]. - Case 7: The Jilin Province Longjing City People's Procuratorate highlighted the need for better management of Northeast Anti-Union martyr memorial facilities, addressing issues of neglect [43][44][45]. - Case 8: The Hunan Province Hengyang City Yanfeng District People's Procuratorate focused on the protection of the Hengyang Anti-Japanese Cliff Site, addressing management and safety concerns [49][50]. Group 2: Key Actions and Outcomes - The procuratorates have actively issued recommendations and initiated administrative public interest litigation to ensure that local governments fulfill their responsibilities in protecting historical sites [3][6][14][21]. - Collaborative efforts between procuratorates and local administrative bodies have led to the establishment of protection measures, funding allocations, and the development of educational programs related to red culture [8][22][28][41]. - The cases serve as models for other regions, demonstrating the effectiveness of legal oversight in preserving cultural heritage and promoting public awareness of historical significance [9][16][29][36].