中国检察代表团成员与越南检察官交流研讨。 "中越两国不仅是同志，更是兄弟！"这番饱含深情的话语，回响在中国检察代表团赴越南研修的每一个 场合，也成为两国检察机关深化交流合作的生动写照。 2025年12月15日至24日，应越南最高人民检察院邀请，中国检察代表团一行15人访问越南，双方就检察 制度、刑事诉讼制度、民事公益诉讼试点等工作开展深入交流，在真诚对话中深化友好情谊、凝聚合作 共识、拓宽合作领域。 相互了解、互学互鉴，是代表团此行的目的。所到之处，热烈的交流研讨和深入的思想碰撞从未停歇。 在越南最高人民检察院，中国检察代表团的交流提问层层深入。代表团团长、最高人民检察院公益诉讼 检察厅二级高级检察官刘家璞围绕越南司法改革的背景、最有力措施及成效等关键问题展开细致询问， 了解当地司法改革的整体情况；最高检政治部队伍建设指导部副部长孟守平聚焦队伍建设，连发九问， 详细了解了越南检察机关的干部培养体系。 交流不仅有"面"上的提纲挈领，更有"点"上的精准发问。"如何保障侦查讯问时辩护人在场权利？""如 何区分经济犯罪和民事经济纠纷？"贵州省检察院副检察长张宇的每一个问题，都直指检察实务中的热 点难点，也饱含着从越南 ...

"这份白皮书不仅记录了我们十年的脚步，更见证了检察公益诉讼如何让法治真正融入城市肌理，织密 民生'保护网'。"2025年12月30日，在《深圳公益诉讼检察工作白皮书（2015—2025年）》发布会现 场，广东省深圳市检察院检察官向在场嘉宾介绍道。当天，该院邀请人大代表、政协委员、行政机关代 表、公益诉讼观察员、"益心为公"志愿者等多方人士，共同回顾检察公益诉讼从制度设计走向民生实践 的过程。 案例故事中的民生温度 "我是公益诉讼的推动者，更是受益者！"视障人士马景阳讲述了深圳市检察机关督促推动马路安装声感 信息装置，让视障人士能够独立出行，促推医院开通电话挂号渠道和免费无障碍陪诊服务，让残障人士 看病更加方便的亲身经历。 协同治理中的制度力量 一条河流如何重现清澈？检察建议与行政执法如何协同发力？发布会现场，深圳市水务局副局长赵斌彬 用具体案例展现了"行政+检察"协作机制的效能。 据赵斌彬介绍，通过"水行政执法+检察公益诉讼""河湖长+检察长"双重协作机制，检察机关与水务部门 联合攻克了一批涉水顽疾——从解决人行地下通道雨污混接的执法困境，到推动地铁环线改迁违法施工 整改等等。特别是针对东涌水库项目，检察机关 ...

2026年1月29日，湖北省南漳县检察院干警前往朱家湾路口"回头看"，路口设立的交通警示牌醒目， 地面标线清晰。 "现在路口的标志标线清清楚楚，该怎么走一目了然，心里踏实多了！"日前，湖北省南漳县城关镇南背 村村民刘大爷骑着三轮车，平稳通过346国道朱家湾路口。这个曾经让附近村民忧心忡忡的"隐患路 口"，在检察公益诉讼的推动下，已变得秩序井然、通行顺畅。 2022年新346国道改建后，朱家湾路口因交通标志不清、标线模糊、指向混乱，长期存在车辆逆行、抢 道等乱象，多次发生剐蹭事故，成为周边群众出行的"揪心路"。"按地面箭头走总感觉别扭，牌子指得 也不清楚，经常有车开错道、逆行的，我都亲眼见过好几起事故了。"刘大爷说，他每日骑车途经此 处，总是提心吊胆的。 2025年9月，南漳县检察院干警在走访人大代表联络站时，获悉该线索。该院公益诉讼检察官多次来到 现场，用执法记录仪拍摄，用无人机俯瞰路口全貌，并走访经常通过路口的村民、常跑这条线的货运司 机，记录了标线模糊、指引不清的每一个细节。随后，该院依法向相关单位发出检察建议，建议其立即 对该路口标志标线设置情况进行评估，结合路段实际情况科学增设道路交通信号灯，规范交通 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate (SPP) is actively addressing food and drug safety issues through public interest litigation, focusing on collaborative governance across various sectors and regions to tackle persistent problems in the food safety chain [1][2][3]. Group 1: Key Actions and Achievements - The SPP has organized a nationwide effort involving 348 targeted initiatives to address specific food safety issues, with local procuratorates focusing on prominent local problems [1]. - In Guizhou, the focus was on "meat safety," leading to a 100% compliance rate in veterinary drug residue testing and full coverage of the disposal of dead livestock [1]. - In Qinghai, a model was developed to identify over 1,200 instances of fraudulent or duplicate inspection certificates, resulting in significant regulatory actions across 14,000 sales entities [1]. Group 2: Collaborative Governance - Local procuratorates are breaking down barriers between departments and regions to enhance food safety oversight, as seen in Liaoning, where a consensus was reached between market regulation and agricultural departments regarding bean sprout production [2]. - In Sichuan, collaboration between market regulation and transportation departments led to the identification and rectification of 233 food safety issues in highway service areas [2]. - A nationwide initiative was launched to address systemic issues in community group buying, resulting in the supervision and rectification of over 31,000 distribution points [2]. Group 3: Community Group Buying and Legal Oversight - The SPP has initiated civil public interest litigation to address consumer complaints in community group buying, which has seen over 600 million users across more than 80% of urban communities [3][4]. - The SPP emphasizes that community group buying platforms must adhere to civil law and cannot evade responsibility for consumer rights violations [3]. - Following public hearings, 93 civil public interest lawsuits were filed against platforms for illegal practices, leading to commitments from several major platforms to improve food safety and consumer protection [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate is set to enhance its efforts in public interest litigation, aiming for legislative improvements and increased efficiency in case handling by 2026 [1][2]. Group 1: Legislative and Structural Developments - In 2026, the Public Interest Litigation Procuratorate will focus on legislative initiatives, including the modification of the "People's Procuratorate Public Interest Litigation Case Handling Rules" and related judicial interpretations [1]. - The draft of the Public Interest Litigation Law was submitted for initial review by the National People's Congress in October 2025, with public feedback being solicited [1]. Group 2: Case Handling Statistics - Since the pilot program began in 2015 until November 2025, over 1.243 million public interest litigation cases have been filed, with 1.119 million being administrative cases and approximately 124,000 civil cases [2]. - In the first 11 months of 2025, 129,000 public interest litigation cases were handled, with administrative cases making up 91.7% and civil cases 8.3% [2]. - The issuance of procuratorial suggestions reached 77,000, with a response and rectification rate of 97.3% [2]. Group 3: Focus Areas for 2026 - The Public Interest Litigation Procuratorate will prioritize environmental issues, including water pollution and illegal waste dumping, through targeted litigation efforts [3]. - Initiatives will also focus on food and drug safety, as well as the protection of specific vulnerable groups in the public interest litigation domain [3]. - The agency plans to enhance oversight in tax regulation for retail oil enterprises and protect state assets and cultural heritage through specialized litigation actions [3]. Group 4: Quality and Management Improvements - A special quality survey will be conducted in 2026 to address unclear boundaries in the performance of duties related to public interest litigation, focusing on key elements such as case filing and investigation [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes that community group buying is not outside the law and has initiated civil public interest litigation to address food safety issues in this sector [1][2] Group 1: Overview of Public Interest Litigation - From January to November 2025, procuratorial agencies handled 24,029 cases of food and drug safety public interest litigation, accounting for 19% of total public interest litigation cases, showing significant results [1] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has conducted special supervision activities for community group buying, leading to a series of civil public interest litigation cases [1] Group 2: Legal Responsibilities and Consumer Protection - Community group buying platforms must bear civil legal responsibilities if they violate the Civil Code and commercial laws, as they cannot evade accountability through contractual clauses [2] - The main issue in community group buying is the difficulty in controlling the quality of fresh food and the lack of consumer complaint channels, primarily due to platforms transferring their contractual obligations to offline suppliers [2] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has guided local procuratorial agencies to file 93 civil public interest litigation cases against platform violations and issued 89 announcements urging platforms to amend illegal contractual clauses [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes that community group buying platforms must adhere to civil law and commercial regulations, and should be held accountable for consumer rights violations, advocating for civil public interest litigation to ensure compliance and consumer protection [1]. Group 1: Community Group Buying and Legal Responsibility - Community group buying platforms are currently facing challenges in controlling the quality of fresh food, leading to consumer complaints and difficulties in seeking redress [1]. - The platforms often evade civil legal responsibilities by using standard contract clauses to transfer obligations to offline suppliers, creating a barrier for consumers to assert their rights [1]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has initiated 93 civil public interest litigations against related platform violations and has published 89 announcements urging platforms to amend illegal contract clauses [1]. Group 2: Food and Drug Safety Supervision - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has highlighted several typical cases addressing food and drug safety issues, focusing on key scenarios from offline to online and urban to rural areas [2]. - Specific cases include the supervision of local restaurants for illegal additive use, oversight of online pre-prepared meal safety, and efforts to ensure food safety in local markets benefiting over 20 million people [2]. - The Procuratorate plans to deepen the "Food and Drug Safety Benefit Journey" public interest litigation supervision activity, aiming for precision, quality, and effectiveness in its initiatives by 2025 [2].

Core Insights - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes the rapid development of community group buying as a new retail model for food, with over 600 million users and coverage of more than 80% of urban communities and county markets in China [1] - Issues arise in the quality of fresh food transactions, leading to concentrated consumer complaints and difficulties in rights protection [1] - The need for regulatory improvement in community group buying is highlighted, with a call for civil public interest litigation to address violations of consumer rights [1] Group 1 - Community group buying is characterized by its affordability and convenience, but faces challenges in consumer rights protection due to quality issues [1] - The platform enterprises often evade civil legal responsibilities through standard contract clauses, transferring obligations to offline suppliers, complicating consumer claims [1] - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has initiated civil public interest litigation against platforms, resulting in 93 cases filed and 89 announcements made to enforce compliance with the Civil Code [2] Group 2 - Major platform enterprises have begun to take responsibility for food quality and safety, committing to consumer protection and revising illegal contract terms [2] - The goal of litigation is not merely punitive but aims to establish legal norms and improve consumer rights protection in community group buying [2] - Successful cases of civil public interest litigation serve as practical examples for the standardization and legalization of platform consumption order [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate emphasizes the need for improved consumer protection in the community group buying sector, highlighting the challenges consumers face in asserting their rights due to the contractual practices of platform companies [1] Group 1: Issues in Community Group Buying - The quality control of fresh food on community group buying platforms is difficult, leading to consumer complaints without proper channels for redress [1] - Platform companies, as the main players in the food sales chain, evade civil legal responsibilities through standard contract clauses, transferring obligations to offline suppliers [1] - There is no substantial transaction relationship between offline suppliers and consumers, complicating the consumers' ability to defend their rights [1] Group 2: Legal Actions and Reforms - The Supreme Procuratorate has organized public hearings to clarify the civil legal relationship between platform companies and consumers based on the Civil Code [1] - Prosecutors in regions such as Hunan, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Beijing have initiated 93 civil public interest lawsuits against related platform violations and issued 89 announcements [1] - The actions taken have led to effective rectification of food safety issues in community group buying, safeguarding consumer rights, and providing a successful model for the standardization and legalization of platform consumption order [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses various administrative public interest litigation cases aimed at improving food and drug safety across different regions in China [1][6][25] - The cases highlight the role of public prosecutors in addressing food safety issues, including unsafe drinking water, counterfeit products, and improper use of food additives [1][6][25] - The article emphasizes the importance of collaboration between public prosecutors and administrative agencies to ensure compliance with food safety regulations and protect public health [1][6][25] Group 2 - In Chongqing, the public prosecutor's office initiated litigation to address unsafe drinking water in rural areas, leading to the implementation of corrective measures by local authorities [2][3][5] - In Hunan, a civil public interest lawsuit was filed against individuals for producing and selling counterfeit "Anhua Black Tea," highlighting the need for strict enforcement of food safety laws [6][7][12] - The Beijing Railway Transport Prosecutor's Office utilized big data to uncover illegal online sales of banned drugs, demonstrating innovative approaches to regulatory oversight [13][14][18] Group 3 - The Yunnan case focused on the regulation of pre-prepared dishes in online food services, addressing issues of mislabeling and inadequate food safety practices [19][20][22] - In Hainan, the prosecution addressed illegal food additive use in "Old Dad Tea" establishments, emphasizing the need for regulatory compliance in traditional food practices [25][26][30] - The case in Henan highlighted the importance of ensuring food safety in agricultural wholesale markets, with prosecutors advocating for improved oversight and compliance measures [32][33][36]