Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the growing resistance against AI usage among creators and professionals, emphasizing the value of human creativity and the potential negative impacts of AI on skills and personal expression [3][12][47]. Group 1: Resistance to AI - Jess Johnston and Amy Weatherly, prominent authors with nearly 2 million social media followers, express their refusal to use AI, believing that genuine human expression cannot be replicated by AI [2][3]. - The comments on their post reveal widespread support for resisting AI, indicating that this sentiment is not as niche as expected [5][6]. - The article draws parallels between current resistance to AI and historical movements against technological advancements, such as the Luddites during the Industrial Revolution [9][10][49]. Group 2: Concerns Over Skill Degradation - The article highlights concerns that reliance on AI may lead to "de-skilling," where individuals lose their unique skills and become mere operators of AI tools [21][22]. - Ben, a UI programmer, argues that using AI for tasks can result in a loss of understanding and critical thinking, as individuals may become overly dependent on AI-generated outputs [15][27]. - A study from MIT suggests that habitual use of chatbots may lower cognitive engagement, raising concerns about long-term impacts on learning and skill retention [25][26]. Group 3: The Value of Human Creativity - Many creators, including Liu Chang, argue that artistic expression should remain a human endeavor, as AI lacks the emotional and intentional depth that characterizes true creativity [40][41]. - The article posits that the choice to use or reject AI reflects deeper values regarding the creative process and the importance of maintaining human agency in artistic endeavors [35][39]. - The ongoing debate about AI's role in creative fields underscores the need for individuals to critically assess their relationship with technology and its implications for personal expression [52].