Group 1 - The article highlights the successful resolution of unreasonable qualification thresholds in public bidding processes in Yong'an City, Fujian Province, which has improved the business environment for local enterprises [1] - The local disciplinary inspection and supervision authority discovered and addressed issues related to the arbitrary increase of bidding thresholds, promoting effective measures for source governance in public bidding [1][2] - The initiative is part of a broader effort to optimize the business environment, involving a closed-loop system where enterprises raise issues, departments respond, and the disciplinary body supervises [1] Group 2 - The Yong'an City disciplinary inspection and supervision authority has implemented a "three major one big" decision-making mechanism and established supervision lists for key roles such as financial and procurement management [2] - A total of 889 projects were scrutinized, leading to the identification and rectification of 518 issues related to internal control management and the behavior of bidding agencies [2] - The authority focused on critical stages of project management, addressing 92 cases of responsibility, work style, and corruption issues, while resolving 120 enterprise complaints [2]

Core Viewpoint - The recent cleaning of 38,000 illegal bidding experts aims to purify the expert pool and enhance the fairness and quality of bidding activities, addressing long-standing issues of corruption and collusion in the bidding process [2][3][4]. Group 1: Expert Pool Cleaning - A total of 38,000 illegal bidding experts have been removed from the expert database since the beginning of 2024, with all identified illegal experts being "cleared" [2][3]. - The core reason for this cleaning is the presence of numerous illegal activities among these experts, which has prompted the government to take action to ensure a more professional and reliable expert team [3][4]. - The National Development and Reform Commission has emphasized the need for stricter management and oversight of bidding experts to prevent corruption and ensure fair competition [2][3]. Group 2: Issues in Bidding Process - The bidding process is characterized by a limited number of experts in specific fields, leading to familiarity and potential collusion among them, which increases the risk of biased evaluations [1][4]. - Experts have been known to use coded language to communicate bidding times and locations, facilitating collusion with bidding companies [1][8]. - The lack of effective oversight and professional capacity among procurement personnel contributes to the prevalence of these issues, making it a systemic problem rather than isolated incidents [2][3]. Group 3: Impact of Recent Actions - The recent actions have led to a more transparent and efficient bidding environment, with a reported 11.9% year-on-year increase in the number of private enterprises winning bids in the engineering construction sector [3]. - The government has also revised over 500 policy documents that violated fair competition principles, further promoting a level playing field [3]. - The implementation of digital and intelligent solutions in the bidding process has increased efficiency, with remote evaluations rising by 27.3% and "blind" reviews increasing by 32.5% in the first seven months of the year [11]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - To enhance the integrity of the bidding process, it is crucial to clarify the responsibilities of bidding experts and ensure their evaluations are based on professional and objective criteria [11]. - Strengthening accountability mechanisms for experts and adjusting their compensation based on project complexity and investment size are essential steps to improve compliance and professional standards [11].

为治理招投标乱象，最高人民法院、国家发展改革委联合发布6件人民法院审结的串通投标及其关联犯 罪典型案例。两部门组织指导各地、各有关方面协同整治招投标领域突出问题，依法严惩串通投标及其 关联犯罪，严厉打击以非法手段排除、限制竞争的行为。 ...