一名来自北京的资深招投标专家，在看到"2024年以来已将3.8万名违法专家清理出库，各地专家库中已 查实的违法专家全部'清零'"的新闻后，连连感叹"太正常了"。 他说："评标专家的基本义务是严格按照文件要求公正开展评审。但在实践中，评标专家有太多操作空 间。首先，一个地区专家库的总人数有限，细分到各个行业子专业后，一个地区可能只有20多名相关专 家，再排除因工作繁忙无法参与评标的人员，能够频繁参与评标的专家数量就更有限了。这不到20人的 专家群体，每天评审的都是类似项目，彼此之间会比较熟悉；再加上打分制度中的'软分'（即主观分） 的影响，评审专家的话语权不断上升，这类群体出现问题也就成了正常现象。" 一位来自浙江招投标专家库的专家说，一些专家还会通过"暗语"通知评标时间和地点，比如在朋友圈或 群里发"明天要去某某地方钓鱼"，"话里有话，乙方企业或中间人一看就懂"。 上述北京资深专家认为，评标专家领域的腐败并非个例。要解决这一问题，关键在于采购人招标的环节 ——采购人需要对此做深入研究。但当前招标人既存在投入不足，专业能力欠缺的问题，又缺乏制约评 审专家的有效手段，因此出现问题是必然结果，区别只在于影响范围的大 ...

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening supervision and management of bidding experts to prevent corruption and conflicts of interest in the bidding process [1][2][3] - Various local disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies are actively investigating and addressing issues related to bidding experts, with over 20,000 experts reviewed and more than 3,000 disqualified or removed from their positions [2][3] - The implementation of a "double-blind" remote evaluation system is highlighted as a measure to eliminate familiar influences and ensure impartiality in the evaluation process [3][4] Group 2 - The article discusses the establishment of a digital witness system that includes features such as characteristic code comparison and intelligent review to detect potential risks in bidding documents [4] - Regular collective integrity talks and training sessions for bidding experts are being conducted to enhance their awareness of corruption risks and promote compliance with regulations [5] - The focus on creating a transparent and accountable bidding environment is underscored by the introduction of measures to anonymize key information during the evaluation process [4][5]