Core Viewpoint - The recent cleaning of 38,000 illegal bidding experts aims to purify the expert pool and enhance the fairness and quality of bidding activities, addressing long-standing issues of corruption and collusion in the bidding process [2][3][4]. Group 1: Expert Pool Cleaning - A total of 38,000 illegal bidding experts have been removed from the expert database since the beginning of 2024, with all identified illegal experts being "cleared" [2][3]. - The core reason for this cleaning is the presence of numerous illegal activities among these experts, which has prompted the government to take action to ensure a more professional and reliable expert team [3][4]. - The National Development and Reform Commission has emphasized the need for stricter management and oversight of bidding experts to prevent corruption and ensure fair competition [2][3]. Group 2: Issues in Bidding Process - The bidding process is characterized by a limited number of experts in specific fields, leading to familiarity and potential collusion among them, which increases the risk of biased evaluations [1][4]. - Experts have been known to use coded language to communicate bidding times and locations, facilitating collusion with bidding companies [1][8]. - The lack of effective oversight and professional capacity among procurement personnel contributes to the prevalence of these issues, making it a systemic problem rather than isolated incidents [2][3]. Group 3: Impact of Recent Actions - The recent actions have led to a more transparent and efficient bidding environment, with a reported 11.9% year-on-year increase in the number of private enterprises winning bids in the engineering construction sector [3]. - The government has also revised over 500 policy documents that violated fair competition principles, further promoting a level playing field [3]. - The implementation of digital and intelligent solutions in the bidding process has increased efficiency, with remote evaluations rising by 27.3% and "blind" reviews increasing by 32.5% in the first seven months of the year [11]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - To enhance the integrity of the bidding process, it is crucial to clarify the responsibilities of bidding experts and ensure their evaluations are based on professional and objective criteria [11]. - Strengthening accountability mechanisms for experts and adjusting their compensation based on project complexity and investment size are essential steps to improve compliance and professional standards [11].

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening supervision and management of bidding experts to prevent corruption and conflicts of interest in the bidding process [1][2][3] - Various local disciplinary inspection and supervision agencies are actively investigating and addressing issues related to bidding experts, with over 20,000 experts reviewed and more than 3,000 disqualified or removed from their positions [2][3] - The implementation of a "double-blind" remote evaluation system is highlighted as a measure to eliminate familiar influences and ensure impartiality in the evaluation process [3][4] Group 2 - The article discusses the establishment of a digital witness system that includes features such as characteristic code comparison and intelligent review to detect potential risks in bidding documents [4] - Regular collective integrity talks and training sessions for bidding experts are being conducted to enhance their awareness of corruption risks and promote compliance with regulations [5] - The focus on creating a transparent and accountable bidding environment is underscored by the introduction of measures to anonymize key information during the evaluation process [4][5]