Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the misalignment between current vacation policies and economic development, highlighting the rising trend of short weekend getaways among young people as a response to workplace culture and the demand for better work-life balance [1][28]. Group 1: Vacation Trends and Young Workforce - Young people are increasingly engaging in "48-hour escape tourism," traveling to nearby towns from Friday evening to Sunday night, reflecting a desire for quick getaways [1]. - The recent "Consumption Boost Action Plan" emphasizes the protection of vacation rights, addressing the prevalent issue of overtime culture in workplaces [2][3]. - A significant portion of the younger workforce, particularly the "00s," is actively resisting the "996" work culture, with 79.57% expressing negative attitudes towards it [8]. Group 2: Work-Life Balance and Employment Preferences - According to a report, the top two factors graduates consider when job hunting are growth opportunities and work-life balance [6]. - Many young workers now prioritize companies that offer double weekends as a key criterion for job selection [5]. - The trend of "bridge holidays," where annual leave is strategically used to extend public holidays, is becoming popular among young professionals [9]. Group 3: Structural Issues in Vacation Policies - Despite the official vacation policies, many workers do not enjoy the benefits of double weekends, with only 11.9% able to take complete weekends off [11]. - The average weekly working hours in 2024 are reported to be 49 hours, with 46.1% of workers exceeding 48 hours per week [12]. - The current vacation structure is criticized for being imbalanced, leading to dissatisfaction among workers who feel they cannot fully enjoy their time off [18]. Group 4: Economic Context and Policy Recommendations - The article argues that vacation policies have not kept pace with economic growth, with significant changes in GDP and consumer spending over the years [29][30]. - Recommendations include transitioning from concentrated vacation structures to more flexible ones, promoting a balance that aligns with economic development [24][25]. - The article suggests that as economic conditions evolve, vacation policies should also adapt to meet the changing needs of the workforce [25][28].