Core Viewpoint - The recent advertisement by Nanfu Battery has sparked controversy due to its perceived insensitivity towards the realities of workers, highlighting a disconnect between marketing strategies and public sentiment [3][4]. Group 1: Advertisement Controversy - A Nanfu advertisement displayed on high-speed train seat tables has drawn criticism for its overly enthusiastic portrayal of work-related travel, which contrasts sharply with the sentiments of many workers [3]. - The ad's language has been described as sycophantic and has been labeled as "borderline offensive" by some netizens, indicating a failure to resonate with the target audience [3][4]. - Despite generating significant public attention, the effectiveness of such "edgy" marketing tactics is questioned, as they may not lead to long-term brand loyalty or positive reputation [3][4]. Group 2: Marketing Strategy and Public Perception - The controversy reflects a broader societal sensitivity towards workplace culture and advertising expressions, suggesting that companies need to be more attuned to public sentiment [4]. - Nanfu's marketing department is currently evaluating the appropriateness of the advertisement, indicating a recognition of the need for better alignment between marketing messages and audience perceptions [4]. - The placement of the ad in a public transport setting raises questions about the appropriateness of such content in shared spaces, highlighting the need for stricter oversight in advertising practices [4].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the controversy surrounding a recent advertisement by Nanfu batteries, which was perceived as overly enthusiastic and disconnected from the reality of workers' sentiments during business trips [2][3][4] - The advertisement's content has been criticized for being inappropriate and potentially offensive, reflecting a misalignment with the target audience's feelings [2][3] - Nanfu's marketing department is currently evaluating the appropriateness of the advertisement, indicating a need for companies to better understand public sentiment and the implications of their marketing strategies [3][4] Group 2 - The incident underscores the sensitivity of society towards workplace culture and advertising expressions, suggesting that companies should be more attentive to the emotional responses of their audience [4] - The advertisement's placement in a public space, such as a high-speed train, raises questions about the appropriateness of such content in shared environments, highlighting the need for stricter oversight in advertising [3][4]