Workflow
政府采购违规
icon
Search documents
高金食品控股公司因违规转包被罚9万元,禁止一年内参与政府采购
Qi Lu Wan Bao· 2025-10-16 03:49
据公告内容,遂宁市高金食品有限公司在参与"来凤县营养改善计划采购项目(第一标段冷鲜肉配送)"(项目编号:NIYD- LFCG-2022-039a)时,作为中标供应商,在项目实施过程中将合同内容转包给第三方,违反了《中华人民共和国政府采购法实 施条例》第七十二条第一款第四项的规定。 根据《中华人民共和国政府采购法》第七十七条第一款,来凤县财政局对该公司作出如下处理决定:处以采购金额千分之五的罚 款,即人民币9万元;将其列入不良行为记录名单;禁止其在一年内参与政府采购活动。处罚决定自2025年10月13日起生效。 近日,湖北省来凤县财政局发布一则针对遂宁市高金食品有限公司的严重违法失信行为公告。该公司因在政府采购项目中违规转 包,被处以罚款、列入不良行为记录名单,并禁止一年内参与政府采购活动。 公开资料显示,遂宁市高金食品有限公司成立于2014-02-25,法定代表人为杨莉,注册资本为5000万元,统一社会信用代码为 91510900092128254F,企业注册地址位于遂宁市工业园区滨江南路666号22栋,所属行业为农副食品加工业,为四川高金食品股 份有限公司控股子公司。 产经新闻爆料电话:0531-85196 ...
高校花85万采购299元“路由器” 有种“巧合”叫“所有人都瞎了”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-09-07 19:27
Core Viewpoint - The investigation revealed significant issues in the procurement process at Chongqing Three Gorges University, where a company submitted false qualifications and won a bid for a firewall device that was actually a low-cost router, highlighting systemic failures in oversight and accountability [8][11][30]. Group 1: Procurement Process Issues - The company, Hongzheng, submitted a false qualification letter to participate in the bidding process, despite lacking proper credentials and a history of compliance [5][16]. - During the evaluation, experts failed to verify the equipment specifications and merely conducted a superficial inquiry, allowing the company to win the bid despite the product being unsuitable for the intended purpose [6][22]. - The procurement agency, the Municipal Procurement Center, did not fulfill its responsibilities adequately, leading to a lack of proper checks and balances in the bidding process [8][29]. Group 2: Consequences and Accountability - The investigation led to disciplinary actions against several individuals, including the deputy dean of the university and staff from the procurement center, indicating a push for accountability [9][37]. - The penalties imposed on the involved parties, including a fine of 9,000 yuan on the company and a three-year ban from procurement, were criticized as insufficient compared to the 850,000 yuan project value [38][41]. - The overall response to the incident raised concerns about the effectiveness of oversight mechanisms in preventing similar occurrences in the future [38][41].
“中标价85万,网购价仅299元”?官方通报
证券时报· 2025-09-07 07:28
Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the procurement of firewall and DNS equipment by Chongqing Three Gorges University, where the winning bid was 850,000 yuan for a product that retails for only 299 yuan on an e-commerce platform [2][4] - A joint investigation team was established by the Chongqing Municipal Finance Bureau and the Education Commission to conduct a thorough investigation into the procurement process [3][4] - The investigation revealed that the winning company, Hongzheng, made false commitments and disrupted the procurement order, while the university failed to fulfill its responsibilities and the procurement agency did not properly execute its duties [11][12] Group 2 - Specific individuals were held accountable, including the university's deputy dean Wang, who is under investigation, and other staff members who were also scrutinized for their roles in the procurement process [4][12] - The evaluation experts involved in the bidding process were dismissed and banned from participating in government procurement evaluations [7][12] - Hongzheng Company was fined 9,000 yuan for violating government procurement laws and was listed as a company with poor conduct, prohibiting it from participating in government procurement for three years [7][12]
“中标价85万,网购价仅299元”?官方通报
财联社· 2025-09-07 05:41
Core Viewpoint - The investigation into the procurement incident at Chongqing Three Gorges University revealed significant misconduct in the procurement process, leading to the investigation and accountability of several individuals and entities involved [1][4][6]. Group 1: Incident Background - In May, the procurement of a firewall by Chongqing Three Gorges University attracted public attention due to the stark price discrepancy, with the winning bid being 850,000 yuan for a product that retailed for only 299 yuan [2][8]. - A joint investigation team was established by the Chongqing government, including the Finance Bureau and the Education Committee, to conduct a thorough investigation into the incident [3]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - The investigation found that Hongzheng Company made false commitments and disrupted the procurement order, while Chongqing Three Gorges University failed to fulfill its responsibilities and lacked proper oversight [4][10]. - The procurement agency, the Municipal Procurement Center, did not adequately perform its duties, and the evaluation process was superficial, lacking in-depth scrutiny of the bids [4][10]. - No evidence of collusion or benefit transfer between Hongzheng Company and Chongqing Three Gorges University was found during the investigation [5][10]. Group 3: Accountability Measures - The investigation led to serious repercussions for involved parties, including the initiation of investigations against Vice President Wang, the director and deputy director of the Experimental Training Center, and staff from the Network Information Department [6][11]. - The Municipal Procurement Center staff involved were also held accountable, with one being investigated and another receiving a reprimand [6][11]. - The evaluation experts were dismissed and banned from participating in future government procurement evaluations, while Hongzheng Company was fined 9,000 yuan and banned from government procurement activities for three years due to violations of procurement laws [6][11].
“中标价85万设备,网购仅299元”,重庆通报:多人被立案调查
中国基金报· 2025-09-07 00:09
Core Viewpoint - The investigation into the procurement of firewall and DNS equipment by Chongqing Three Gorges University revealed significant issues, including fraudulent practices by the winning bidder and negligence by the university and procurement agency [2][6]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The procurement project for firewall and DNS equipment was budgeted at 900,000 yuan, with a competitive negotiation process initiated by the university [3]. - The winning bid was awarded to Hongzheng Company, which quoted 850,000 yuan per unit for a product that retailed for only 299 yuan on an e-commerce platform [2][3]. Group 2: Bidder's Background - Hongzheng Company, established in June 2015, had no prior bidding experience and was previously listed in the business abnormality record due to lack of tax and social security contributions [4]. - The company submitted false documentation to gain bidding eligibility and selected an inappropriate product based on online searches [5]. Group 3: Evaluation Process - The evaluation committee failed to verify the product specifications and relied on the lowest bid without thorough assessment [5]. - Concerns raised by the procurement representative regarding the suitability of the product were not escalated to higher authorities in a timely manner [6]. Group 4: Findings and Accountability - The investigation identified multiple failures, including fraudulent actions by Hongzheng Company and inadequate oversight by Chongqing Three Gorges University and the procurement agency [6]. - Several individuals involved in the procurement process faced disciplinary actions, including investigations and dismissals [7]. Group 5: Regulatory Actions - Hongzheng Company was fined 9,000 yuan and banned from participating in government procurement for three years due to violations of procurement laws [7]. - The investigation prompted calls for improved regulatory frameworks and internal controls to prevent similar incidents in the future [7].
重庆市联合调查组通报!
券商中国· 2025-09-06 23:27
Core Viewpoint - The procurement scandal involving Chongqing Three Gorges University highlights significant issues in government procurement processes, including the use of false documentation and lack of oversight by responsible parties [1][6]. Procurement Incident Overview - In May, Chongqing Three Gorges University announced a procurement for firewall and DNS equipment, with the winning bid priced at 850,000 yuan per unit, while the actual retail price was only 299 yuan [1]. - The project had a budget of 900,000 yuan and was conducted through competitive negotiation, with the lowest bid winning [3]. Investigation Findings - The investigation revealed that the winning company, Hongzheng Company, submitted false documents to gain bidding eligibility and selected an inappropriate product (a router instead of a firewall) based on online searches [3][6]. - The evaluation process was criticized for being superficial, with experts failing to verify the product specifications adequately [4][6]. Accountability Measures - The investigation led to disciplinary actions against several individuals, including the university's vice president and staff involved in the procurement process [2][7]. - Hongzheng Company was fined 9,000 yuan and banned from participating in government procurement for three years due to violations of procurement laws [2][7]. Systemic Issues Identified - The investigation highlighted systemic issues, including inadequate responsibility from Chongqing Three Gorges University and the procurement center, as well as a lack of thoroughness in the evaluation process [6][7].
官方通报“高校花75万买299元路由器”:分管副院长等多人被立案调查
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-09-06 15:33
9月6日晚,重庆市教育委员会官网发布《关于重庆三峡学院防火墙及DNS设备采购事件调查情况的通 报》。 年1月因未公示年报被列入经营异常名录,此前无中标记 录。在全市政府采购领域试点推行供应商基本资格条件承 诺制,不再进行前置审查的背景下,洪正公司股东隆某决 定用刚移出经营异常名录的洪正公司参与重庆三峡学院 项目投标,并提交了不符合实际情况的《基本资格条件承 诺函》,以虚假材料骗取投标资格。在制作投标文件时, 因不具备相关专业知识,便在购物平台搜索防火墙、DNS 设备等关键词,随意选取了普联 TL-R473G(实为路由器) 作为防火墙设备,技术参数直接照抄竞争性谈判文件。 (三)关于竞争性谈判情况。5月6日评标当天,共 有洪正公司等6家公司参与投标,谈判小组由随机抽选专 家魏某、潘某春以及实验实训中心网络信息科工作人员、 采购人代表胡某华组成。评审中,专家魏某、潘某春未核 查参投的设备型号,仅象征性询问产品是否满足要求. 未 从专业角度详细了解产品性能、价格等情况。因洪正公司 承诺均符合条件,且在竞争性谈判中报价最低,被列为拟 中标单位。评审后,市政采中心工作人员、项目经办人仇 某远在认为中标产品无法满足采购需 ...
75万元采购市场价299元产品?重庆三峡学院:拟中标供应商响应产品与校方要求严重不符 已终止
Core Viewpoint - The procurement process for firewall and DNS equipment by Chongqing Three Gorges University has been questioned due to a significant price discrepancy between the winning bid and market prices, leading to the termination of the procurement contract [1][6][7]. Group 1: Procurement Details - The winning bid for the firewall and DNS equipment was announced on May 9, with a total amount of 850,000 yuan, where the main item, a TP-LINK firewall (model TL-R473G), was priced at 750,000 yuan [1][6]. - A user on social media highlighted that the same model was available for only 299 yuan on e-commerce platforms, raising concerns about the legitimacy of the procurement [1][3]. Group 2: Supplier Information - The supplier awarded the contract was Fengdu County Hongzheng Trading Co., Ltd., established on June 4, 2015, with a legal representative named Yu Yan [6]. - The company ranked first in the evaluation scores among other bidders, including China Mobile Communications Group Chongqing Co., Ltd. and Chongqing Changlong Jishi Industrial Co., Ltd. [6]. Group 3: Response and Actions Taken - Chongqing Three Gorges University conducted an investigation and found that the proposed product did not meet the required technical standards, leading to the termination of the procurement process [6][7]. - The university has applied to the procurement agency to terminate the project and will initiate a new procurement process due to identified violations affecting procurement fairness [7][8].