Group 1 - The core argument of the articles is that the recent executive order by the Trump administration, titled "Restoring Gold Standard Science," is perceived as a political maneuver that undermines scientific autonomy in the U.S. by placing scientific evaluation under political control [1][2][3] - The executive order aims to reform research integrity policies, promoting a "transparent, rigorous, and impactful" scientific standard, but it raises concerns among researchers about increased political interference in scientific activities [2][3] - Critics argue that the order could lead to the appointment of political officials to oversee research integrity investigations, which may result in punitive actions against scientists based on vague criteria [3][4] Group 2 - The order has sparked significant backlash from the scientific community, with many scientists signing an open letter condemning the initiative as a means to reinforce political control over national research infrastructure [2][4] - Historical context reveals that during Trump's first term, there were multiple accusations of government interference in scientific independence, leading to a lack of trust in scientific integrity [3][4] - The order's implications extend beyond the U.S., providing insights for China to refine its own research integrity policies, emphasizing the need for stable and continuous policy frameworks [5][6] Group 3 - The articles highlight the importance of maintaining a clear separation between science and politics, suggesting that the U.S. experience serves as a cautionary tale for other countries [5][6] - Recommendations for China include institutionalizing research integrity norms and ensuring that political influence does not compromise scientific investigations [5][6][7] - The current state of research integrity in China shows improvement, with a reported 31.2% decrease in research misconduct cases in 2023, indicating progress in fostering a culture of integrity [7][8]