央视网消息：每天8点，央视网为您梳理24小时内发生在咱们身边的大小事儿。 ·中方就高市早苗错误言行致函古特雷斯：如日方胆敢武力介入台海局势，中方将行使自卫权。 ·"十四五"期间，京津冀大气污染防治取得积极成效。 ·储蓄国债（电子式）将纳入个人养老金产品范围。 ·国家医保局启动医保影像跨省调阅系统建设。 ·前10个月国家铁路累计发送货物33.78亿吨，创历史同期新高。 ·澳大利亚将禁止机舱内使用充电宝。 ·日本流感疫情蔓延，全国半数地区达"警报"级别。 ·全球最大"华龙一号"核电基地2号机组并网发电。 ·香港教育局证实取消取消一师生代表团赴日交流。 ·已造成损失超20亿元！网警发出关于防范木马病毒感染的紧急预警。（详细→） ·美联邦航空局对委内瑞拉空域发布安全警告：民航飞机需保持警惕。 ·特朗普：泽连斯基必须同意美国支持的和平计划。 ·俄总统普京：已收到美提出解决俄乌冲突的计划，俄愿谈判。 ·秘鲁法院下令逮捕前总理贝特西·查韦斯。 ·尼日利亚一学校200多名师生被绑架。 ·哥伦比亚查获13.8吨可卡因。 ·21名非法穿越者在青海可可西里被查获。 ·张家口万全区住建局再通报"一小区地基下沉"：构成局部危房，正开展 ...

人工智能（AI）在广泛赋能科学研究的同时，也催生了"AI洗稿""数据装饰""代笔"等一系列新型科 研诚信问题。如何应对这些新挑战，已成为关乎科学事业健康发展的关键课题。 9月26日，中国科学院学部科技伦理研讨会在北京举行，主题为"人工智能时代的科研诚信"，旨在 为应对AI时代的科研诚信挑战建言献策，为完善我国科研诚信体系、推动AI的负责任应用凝聚共识。 自ChatGPT等大型语言模型问世以来，人工智能已广泛应用于知识获取、数据分析和学术写作等领 域，显著提升了学习与研究效率。然而，AI的深度介入也使学术活动的主体构成发生根本性变化。 以"算法参与"为特征的科研模式，导致了贡献界定模糊、研究过程不透明、结果可解释性下降等一 系列新问题。更复杂的是，AI系统可能携带算法偏见，甚至生成虚假或误导性内容，这使研究结果的 可靠性面临严峻挑战。 中国科学院学部科学道德建设委员会主任胡海岩院士在致辞时强调，当前AI检测技术的发展明显 滞后于AI生成技术，传统查重与识别手段效力渐微，致使科研不端行为更具隐蔽性和复杂性。大量因 AI随机生成内容和虚假引文导致的撤稿案例，已引发国际学术界的广泛警惕。 "AI的应用，至少从两个方面 ...

Core Points - The Chinese Association for Science and Technology (CAST) has revoked awards from five individuals due to violations of academic integrity and misconduct, signaling a strong stance against unethical practices in the scientific community [1][2] - The actions taken by CAST aim to uphold academic integrity, which is essential for the development of a strong scientific nation, and to prevent a negative impact on young researchers [1][2] Group 1 - The revoked awards include the China Youth Science and Technology Award, which is significant for recognizing both academic ability and ethical standards in research [1] - The individuals involved engaged in various unethical behaviors, such as soliciting favors during project applications and leaking confidential information, which undermines the integrity of the research environment [1][2] - The announcement emphasizes the need for strict measures against academic misconduct to maintain a healthy research ecosystem and to protect dedicated researchers [1][2] Group 2 - CAST has established a permanent ban on individuals with serious academic misconduct from participating in its awards or talent programs, reinforcing the importance of accountability [2] - The initiative to combat academic misconduct is a collective responsibility across the scientific community, requiring collaboration among various departments and organizations [2] - The revocation of awards is part of a broader effort involving multiple agencies, including the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Natural Science Foundation, to address and document serious breaches of research integrity [2]

Group 1 - The Chinese Youth Science and Technology Award and the Chinese Young Female Scientist Award have had their first-ever recipients disqualified due to violations of scientific integrity and misconduct [2][3] - Five individuals had their awards revoked, with the time span from their original awards to revocation reaching up to 21 years [2][3] - The Chinese Youth Science and Technology Award has recognized 1,804 young scientists since its inception, with approximately 10% of recipients later becoming academicians [3] Group 2 - The Chinese Young Female Scientist Award has been awarded to 204 female scientists and 19 teams since 2004, with 9 recipients later becoming academicians [3] - The announcement regarding the revocation of awards did not specify the exact misconduct of the individuals involved, but it was revealed that some were involved in criminal activities while others engaged in scientific misconduct [5][6] - Previous instances of award revocation in China include the 2011 case involving a professor from Xi'an Jiaotong University, which was due to academic fraud [4] Group 3 - Zhou Xinyuan, one of the revoked awardees, was convicted of embezzlement and sentenced to four years in prison for misappropriating over 20 million yuan [5][6] - Chen Zheyu, another revoked recipient, was sentenced to two and a half years for misusing research funds [7][8] - Sun Beicheng and Zhao Yuanjin were involved in a case of improper solicitation during project evaluations, leading to their disqualification from future funding activities [9][10] Group 4 - Liu Jianni, the only female recipient among the revoked individuals, was found guilty of multiple violations during the evaluation process of her research projects [11][12] - The revocation of these awards serves as a reminder of the importance of scientific integrity and the consequences of misconduct in research [12][13]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Association for Science and Technology (CAST) emphasizes the importance of maintaining academic integrity and has taken action against individuals involved in academic misconduct by revoking their awards, sending a strong message against unethical practices in the scientific community [1][2]. Group 1: Actions Taken - CAST announced the revocation of awards from five individuals, including the China Youth Science and Technology Award, due to violations of academic integrity and misconduct [1]. - The actions include the withdrawal of medals, certificates, and monetary rewards, highlighting a zero-tolerance approach towards academic misconduct [2]. Group 2: Implications for the Scientific Community - The revocation of awards serves as a warning that unethical behavior undermines the integrity of the scientific community and can lead to a negative impact on young researchers [1]. - The need for a robust regulatory framework to prevent academic misconduct is emphasized, including the establishment of a long-term monitoring mechanism for research integrity [2]. Group 3: Collaborative Responsibility - The responsibility for maintaining research integrity is shared across the entire scientific community, requiring collective efforts to combat academic misconduct [2]. - The actions taken against the individuals involved are part of a coordinated effort among multiple departments, reinforcing the message that academic integrity is a priority [2].

Core Insights - Springer Nature has launched a new tool to detect non-standard phrases in journal and book submissions, aimed at maintaining research integrity and safeguarding academic records [1][2] - The tool identifies awkward or overly complex phrases that may indicate the use of paraphrasing tools to evade plagiarism detection, leading to the rejection of submissions with excessive non-standard phrases [1] - The development of this tool is part of a long-term project involving collaboration between Springer Nature's research integrity team and various technical teams, utilizing insights from academic integrity detectives [1] Tool Features - The non-standard phrase detector is the latest addition to Springer Nature's research integrity solutions, complementing existing tools such as meaningless text detectors and tools for identifying image duplication or tampering [2] - The tool is based on the "Problem Paper Screening" (PPS) system, which initially focused on computer science papers but has since expanded to screen all published literature [2] - Springer Nature has contributed to the STM Integrity Hub, providing a meaningless text detection tool for broader industry use, reinforcing its commitment to publishing integrity [2]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the scrutiny of a student, Luo, from North Sichuan Medical College, regarding the authenticity of his research achievements and publications [1][2] - Luo has published a total of 7 papers, including 1 article as the first author in Frontiers in Nutrition, 1 meta-analysis in Frontiers in Public Health, and 1 correspondence in Nature Machine Intelligence, along with 4 letters as a corresponding author in various journals [1] - The school has taken the allegations seriously, forming a special working group to investigate and verify the claims made against Luo [1] Group 2 - The controversial PPT image in question was related to the 2024 "Changhua Scholarship" evaluation, where Luo's presentation was criticized for being overly self-promotional and lacking rigor in the representation of his achievements [2] - The institution emphasizes its commitment to cultivating students' innovative capabilities and will enhance guidance, supervision, and management to foster a positive research environment [2]

Group 1 - The core argument of the articles is that the recent executive order by the Trump administration, titled "Restoring Gold Standard Science," is perceived as a political maneuver that undermines scientific autonomy in the U.S. by placing scientific evaluation under political control [1][2][3] - The executive order aims to reform research integrity policies, promoting a "transparent, rigorous, and impactful" scientific standard, but it raises concerns among researchers about increased political interference in scientific activities [2][3] - Critics argue that the order could lead to the appointment of political officials to oversee research integrity investigations, which may result in punitive actions against scientists based on vague criteria [3][4] Group 2 - The order has sparked significant backlash from the scientific community, with many scientists signing an open letter condemning the initiative as a means to reinforce political control over national research infrastructure [2][4] - Historical context reveals that during Trump's first term, there were multiple accusations of government interference in scientific independence, leading to a lack of trust in scientific integrity [3][4] - The order's implications extend beyond the U.S., providing insights for China to refine its own research integrity policies, emphasizing the need for stable and continuous policy frameworks [5][6] Group 3 - The articles highlight the importance of maintaining a clear separation between science and politics, suggesting that the U.S. experience serves as a cautionary tale for other countries [5][6] - Recommendations for China include institutionalizing research integrity norms and ensuring that political influence does not compromise scientific investigations [5][6][7] - The current state of research integrity in China shows improvement, with a reported 31.2% decrease in research misconduct cases in 2023, indicating progress in fostering a culture of integrity [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The report outlines the violations related to the application for a key research project by Oriental Yuhong and its associated parties, highlighting issues of material forgery and improper conduct in the project application process [1][2][3]. Group 1: Violations by Oriental Yuhong - Oriental Yuhong, represented by Wang Jian, engaged in signing a consulting contract with Hainan Xingying Technology Co., which involved the writing and submission of project application materials [2]. - The company was found to have fabricated relevant materials and exhibited management negligence [2]. - As a result, the project was revoked, and Oriental Yuhong is prohibited from participating in government-funded scientific activities for three years, with a record of serious dishonesty in scientific integrity [2]. Group 2: Violations by Hainan Xingying Technology Co. - Hainan Xingying Technology Co., under the control of Yang Jianxin, was involved in the same consulting contract and fulfilled its obligations related to the project application [3]. - The company received a public reprimand and is banned from participating in government-funded scientific activities for two years, with a record of serious dishonesty in scientific integrity [3]. Group 3: Violations by Jiang Dianzheng - Jiang Dianzheng, a former employee of Oriental Yuhong, signed the consulting contract and was involved in its execution [4]. - He cooperated with the investigation and received a public reprimand without further penalties [5]. Group 4: Institutional Responsibility and Future Actions - The violations indicate a lack of responsibility from the involved institutions regarding the management and education of scientific integrity [5]. - The Hainan Provincial Department of Science and Technology emphasizes the need for stronger supervision and accountability in scientific research activities [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of following the WeChat public account "Instrument Information Network" to receive updates and resources related to various industry reports and data packages. Group 1: Free Resource Offers - Users can reply with specific codes to receive various free resources, including an upgraded AI data package and a deep research report on smart manufacturing driven by industrial big data [3][6]. - Additional resources available include project lists for equipment updates in Guizhou Province and various guidelines related to health services and scientific research [6][9]. Group 2: Laboratory Configuration and Standards - The article provides a list of free resources related to laboratory configurations, including standards for different types of laboratories such as P3 labs, chemical labs, and environmental labs [11][12]. - Specific guidelines for equipment configuration in secondary hospitals and community health service centers are also available [11][12].