人工智能（AI）在广泛赋能科学研究的同时，也催生了"AI洗稿""数据装饰""代笔"等一系列新型科 研诚信问题。如何应对这些新挑战，已成为关乎科学事业健康发展的关键课题。 9月26日，中国科学院学部科技伦理研讨会在北京举行，主题为"人工智能时代的科研诚信"，旨在 为应对AI时代的科研诚信挑战建言献策，为完善我国科研诚信体系、推动AI的负责任应用凝聚共识。 自ChatGPT等大型语言模型问世以来，人工智能已广泛应用于知识获取、数据分析和学术写作等领 域，显著提升了学习与研究效率。然而，AI的深度介入也使学术活动的主体构成发生根本性变化。 以"算法参与"为特征的科研模式，导致了贡献界定模糊、研究过程不透明、结果可解释性下降等一 系列新问题。更复杂的是，AI系统可能携带算法偏见，甚至生成虚假或误导性内容，这使研究结果的 可靠性面临严峻挑战。 中国科学院学部科学道德建设委员会主任胡海岩院士在致辞时强调，当前AI检测技术的发展明显 滞后于AI生成技术，传统查重与识别手段效力渐微，致使科研不端行为更具隐蔽性和复杂性。大量因 AI随机生成内容和虚假引文导致的撤稿案例，已引发国际学术界的广泛警惕。 "AI的应用，至少从两个方面 ...

新华社北京9月19日电 坚守诚信底线，科技界再敲警钟：决不让歪风侵蚀科研生态！ 中国科协19日发布公告，因周新源等5人存在违纪违法行为或科研失信行为，奖项主办单位决定撤销其 所获中国青年科技奖等奖励，并收回奖章、证书、奖金。 奖项作为激励科技人才的重要荣誉，承载着对学术能力与学术道德的双重认可。而此次被撤销奖励的人 中，有的在申报国家重点研发计划项目时实施请托、打招呼；有的为申请人请托提供协助并妨碍调查核 实工作；有的泄露自己专家身份、为申请人提供帮助并泄露评审信息；有的甚至触犯法律。这些行为既 背离了奖项设立初衷，更给青年科研群体带来不良影响，容易让歪风侵蚀科研环境。 整治学术不端更要扎紧制度笼子，建立常态化、长效性的科研诚信监管机制。强化相关单位的担责精神 和治理水平，通过主动开展学术不端情况专项检查、搭建不良现象投诉举报平台等方式，加强不良学风 发现和惩处力度。根据中国科协最新制定的处理办法，存在严重科研失信行为的人员将永久不得参评中 国科协表彰奖励项目或人才计划。 风清气正的创新生态需要各方共同维护。科研诚信建设不是一个部门、一家单位的事，而是整个科技界 的共同责任。攥指成拳，才能对学术不端形成痛击。 ...

Group 1 - The Chinese Youth Science and Technology Award and the Chinese Young Female Scientist Award have had their first-ever recipients disqualified due to violations of scientific integrity and misconduct [2][3] - Five individuals had their awards revoked, with the time span from their original awards to revocation reaching up to 21 years [2][3] - The Chinese Youth Science and Technology Award has recognized 1,804 young scientists since its inception, with approximately 10% of recipients later becoming academicians [3] Group 2 - The Chinese Young Female Scientist Award has been awarded to 204 female scientists and 19 teams since 2004, with 9 recipients later becoming academicians [3] - The announcement regarding the revocation of awards did not specify the exact misconduct of the individuals involved, but it was revealed that some were involved in criminal activities while others engaged in scientific misconduct [5][6] - Previous instances of award revocation in China include the 2011 case involving a professor from Xi'an Jiaotong University, which was due to academic fraud [4] Group 3 - Zhou Xinyuan, one of the revoked awardees, was convicted of embezzlement and sentenced to four years in prison for misappropriating over 20 million yuan [5][6] - Chen Zheyu, another revoked recipient, was sentenced to two and a half years for misusing research funds [7][8] - Sun Beicheng and Zhao Yuanjin were involved in a case of improper solicitation during project evaluations, leading to their disqualification from future funding activities [9][10] Group 4 - Liu Jianni, the only female recipient among the revoked individuals, was found guilty of multiple violations during the evaluation process of her research projects [11][12] - The revocation of these awards serves as a reminder of the importance of scientific integrity and the consequences of misconduct in research [12][13]

新华社北京9月19日电 题：决不让歪风侵蚀科研生态！ 整治学术不端必须动真格，通过严肃处理、通报曝光，形成高压态势和强大震慑。此次中国科协对科研 失信的获奖者撤销奖项并公开通报，就是要以零容忍的态度、动真格的力度，向科技界释放出"学术作 风底线绝不可突破"的强烈信号。 整治学术不端更要扎紧制度笼子，建立常态化、长效性的科研诚信监管机制。强化相关单位的担责精神 和治理水平，通过主动开展学术不端情况专项检查、搭建不良现象投诉举报平台等方式，加强不良学风 发现和惩处力度。根据中国科协最新制定的处理办法，存在严重科研失信行为的人员将永久不得参评中 国科协表彰奖励项目或人才计划。 风清气正的创新生态需要各方共同维护。科研诚信建设不是一个部门、一家单位的事，而是整个科技界 的共同责任。攥指成拳，才能对学术不端形成痛击。此次被撤奖的相关人员，其违规行为此前分别被科 技部、自然科学基金委核查处理，记入科研诚信严重失信行为数据库，此次被中国科协撤销所获奖励， 正是多部门联合行动的结果。 只有对学术不端者绝不姑息，才是对那些甘坐板凳十年冷、勇闯科学"无人区"的科研工作者最有力的撑 腰、最真诚的尊重。期待更多部门和单位将动真格的治 ...

Core Insights - Springer Nature has launched a new tool to detect non-standard phrases in journal and book submissions, aimed at maintaining research integrity and safeguarding academic records [1][2] - The tool identifies awkward or overly complex phrases that may indicate the use of paraphrasing tools to evade plagiarism detection, leading to the rejection of submissions with excessive non-standard phrases [1] - The development of this tool is part of a long-term project involving collaboration between Springer Nature's research integrity team and various technical teams, utilizing insights from academic integrity detectives [1] Tool Features - The non-standard phrase detector is the latest addition to Springer Nature's research integrity solutions, complementing existing tools such as meaningless text detectors and tools for identifying image duplication or tampering [2] - The tool is based on the "Problem Paper Screening" (PPS) system, which initially focused on computer science papers but has since expanded to screen all published literature [2] - Springer Nature has contributed to the STM Integrity Hub, providing a meaningless text detection tool for broader industry use, reinforcing its commitment to publishing integrity [2]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the scrutiny of a student, Luo, from North Sichuan Medical College, regarding the authenticity of his research achievements and publications [1][2] - Luo has published a total of 7 papers, including 1 article as the first author in Frontiers in Nutrition, 1 meta-analysis in Frontiers in Public Health, and 1 correspondence in Nature Machine Intelligence, along with 4 letters as a corresponding author in various journals [1] - The school has taken the allegations seriously, forming a special working group to investigate and verify the claims made against Luo [1] Group 2 - The controversial PPT image in question was related to the 2024 "Changhua Scholarship" evaluation, where Luo's presentation was criticized for being overly self-promotional and lacking rigor in the representation of his achievements [2] - The institution emphasizes its commitment to cultivating students' innovative capabilities and will enhance guidance, supervision, and management to foster a positive research environment [2]

Group 1 - The core argument of the articles is that the recent executive order by the Trump administration, titled "Restoring Gold Standard Science," is perceived as a political maneuver that undermines scientific autonomy in the U.S. by placing scientific evaluation under political control [1][2][3] - The executive order aims to reform research integrity policies, promoting a "transparent, rigorous, and impactful" scientific standard, but it raises concerns among researchers about increased political interference in scientific activities [2][3] - Critics argue that the order could lead to the appointment of political officials to oversee research integrity investigations, which may result in punitive actions against scientists based on vague criteria [3][4] Group 2 - The order has sparked significant backlash from the scientific community, with many scientists signing an open letter condemning the initiative as a means to reinforce political control over national research infrastructure [2][4] - Historical context reveals that during Trump's first term, there were multiple accusations of government interference in scientific independence, leading to a lack of trust in scientific integrity [3][4] - The order's implications extend beyond the U.S., providing insights for China to refine its own research integrity policies, emphasizing the need for stable and continuous policy frameworks [5][6] Group 3 - The articles highlight the importance of maintaining a clear separation between science and politics, suggesting that the U.S. experience serves as a cautionary tale for other countries [5][6] - Recommendations for China include institutionalizing research integrity norms and ensuring that political influence does not compromise scientific investigations [5][6][7] - The current state of research integrity in China shows improvement, with a reported 31.2% decrease in research misconduct cases in 2023, indicating progress in fostering a culture of integrity [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The report outlines the violations related to the application for a key research project by Oriental Yuhong and its associated parties, highlighting issues of material forgery and improper conduct in the project application process [1][2][3]. Group 1: Violations by Oriental Yuhong - Oriental Yuhong, represented by Wang Jian, engaged in signing a consulting contract with Hainan Xingying Technology Co., which involved the writing and submission of project application materials [2]. - The company was found to have fabricated relevant materials and exhibited management negligence [2]. - As a result, the project was revoked, and Oriental Yuhong is prohibited from participating in government-funded scientific activities for three years, with a record of serious dishonesty in scientific integrity [2]. Group 2: Violations by Hainan Xingying Technology Co. - Hainan Xingying Technology Co., under the control of Yang Jianxin, was involved in the same consulting contract and fulfilled its obligations related to the project application [3]. - The company received a public reprimand and is banned from participating in government-funded scientific activities for two years, with a record of serious dishonesty in scientific integrity [3]. Group 3: Violations by Jiang Dianzheng - Jiang Dianzheng, a former employee of Oriental Yuhong, signed the consulting contract and was involved in its execution [4]. - He cooperated with the investigation and received a public reprimand without further penalties [5]. Group 4: Institutional Responsibility and Future Actions - The violations indicate a lack of responsibility from the involved institutions regarding the management and education of scientific integrity [5]. - The Hainan Provincial Department of Science and Technology emphasizes the need for stronger supervision and accountability in scientific research activities [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of following the WeChat public account "Instrument Information Network" to receive updates and resources related to various industry reports and data packages. Group 1: Free Resource Offers - Users can reply with specific codes to receive various free resources, including an upgraded AI data package and a deep research report on smart manufacturing driven by industrial big data [3][6]. - Additional resources available include project lists for equipment updates in Guizhou Province and various guidelines related to health services and scientific research [6][9]. Group 2: Laboratory Configuration and Standards - The article provides a list of free resources related to laboratory configurations, including standards for different types of laboratories such as P3 labs, chemical labs, and environmental labs [11][12]. - Specific guidelines for equipment configuration in secondary hospitals and community health service centers are also available [11][12].

Core Points - The National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) has issued a stern statement regarding the illegal sale and modification of project application documents by unauthorized entities, which harms the reputation of scientific funding and the research ecosystem [1][2] - The NSFC emphasizes that any unauthorized use of its name, logo, or abbreviation for commercial purposes is prohibited and will lead to legal consequences [1] - The NSFC has reported illegal activities to relevant authorities and will take legal action against those involved in the sale or modification of project applications [1][2] Summary by Sections - **Illegal Activities**: Unauthorized entities are selling and modifying NSFC project application documents, which is illegal and damaging to the scientific community [1][2] - **Legal Framework**: According to Article 104, Clause 3 of the Science and Technology Progress Law of the People's Republic of China, buying, ghostwriting, or providing services for project applications is prohibited [1] - **Warning to Researchers**: Researchers are advised to maintain integrity and avoid engaging in any form of application document transactions, and to report any extortion attempts [2] - **Enforcement Actions**: The NSFC will intensify efforts to investigate and penalize those involved in illegal activities related to project applications, including potential criminal prosecution [2]